…yep.
Marky Ramone played this one on his Punk Rock Blitzkrieg show on XM tonight. Said it was as punk as anything that came in 1976 and after. True enough.
I love how crazed they look at the end. That’s punk.
"...[The War Room] has plenty of fascinating insights and is a must-read for political junkies." - The Toronto Sun "Warren Kinsella’s new book is a must-read for anyone interested in political campaigning in Canada. And not just political campaigning." - The Literary Review of Canada "The War Room is a rich, detailed, and substantive primer on how to run a winning war room - warts, pizza boxes, smelly couches and all - from a master war roomer." - The Hill Times "Kinsella has crafted a handy little guide for politicos and non-politicos alike. Just keep it away from the kids." - The Winnipeg Free Press "... a great read ... full of fascinating stories..." - John Moore, CFRB "...I don't want to say [he's a] genius...but there's valuable insights here..." - John Oakley, AM640 "I just got one copy, but I plan to get more!" - John Wright, Ipsos, CFRB "I do recommend [The War Room] to everyone." - Charles Adler, Adler Online "A fascinating book...full of great stories." - Ken Rockburn, CPAC ![]() ![]() Archive for November, 2010
Tuesday, November 30th, 2010
Tuesday, November 30th, 2010
My former Calgary Herald colleague, Don Martin, has left the National Post – and, I presume, the Herald - to become the new host of Power Play. That’s good news for CTV, but not so great for Postmedia. The Post’s John Ivison is a gifted writer with an acerbic wit, but – last time I checked – John was one person. He can’t cover the entire Hill, as a columnist, all on his own. I think Postmedia will need to sign up someone else for North of the Queensway columnar duties, but what do I know. In any event, big congrats to Don. I miss sparring with Powers on CTV’s news channel, but he’ll be Prime Minister of Newfoundland in a few weeks’ time, so that’s that.
Tuesday, November 30th, 2010
The Citizen’s editors responded quickly and effectively to my complaint. That was that. This afternoon, nearly a month later, Lee Greenberg tried again. A few folks contacted me – through this web site and Facebook – to let me know that Greenberg had re-published his bullshit. The Post has published it, too, under Greenberg’s byline. This time, I copied my lawyer on my emailed request that the Citizen refrain from letting Greenberg from publishing made-up stuff. They have removed said B.S. from the web edition of the paper, and I’ve been assured it won’t show up in the print edition, either. Last time I checked, however, it was still on the Post web site, so a libel notice will be winging its way to them tomorrow afternoon. Anyway. How can this happen twice? Beats me. Maybe the desk isn’t checking Greenberg’s stuff enough. Or, perhaps someone thought it was a way to take a shot at someone who writes for a competitor. (I hope not, but who knows.) In any event, my advice still stands: if you work in politics, and Lee Greenberg calls you… Hang up. UPDATE: The Post has deleted the false part.
Tuesday, November 30th, 2010
Messrs. Harper and Hudak should reconsider their association with these lunatics. But they won’t.
Tuesday, November 30th, 2010
Tim Hudak reacts to his biggest policy issue. You can’t make this up. Yesterday, Legislature staff mistakenly placed the Speaker’s Christmas tree in front of Hudak’s office. It was there for a few hours. They realized their mistake, and went back to put it in the right spot. Hudak – perhaps hoping we’d all forget he’s been a No Plan Zone for 519 days – started Twittering about this burning issue non-stop. He even had staff do up stickers, at taxpayer expense, about his missing tree. This guy makes Charlie Brown look like Winston Churchill. Swear to God. *** timhudak <http://twitter.com/> Tim Hudak Mysterious tree appears in spot outside door but looks more like Charlie Brown Christmas tree than original http://plixi.com/p/60026921 <http://plixi.com/p/60026921> 14 hours ago <http://twitter.com/> Favorite <http://twitter.com/> Retweet <http://twitter.com/> Reply <http://twitter.com/> 18 hours ago <http://twitter.com/> Favorite <http://twitter.com/> Retweet <http://twitter.com/> Reply <http://twitter.com/> 18 hours ago <http://twitter.com/> Favorite <http://twitter.com/> Retweet <http://twitter.com/> Reply <http://twitter.com/>
Tuesday, November 30th, 2010
Some Reformatory commenters are driving me bonkers in Comments – saying Vaughan is a “huge” win for the blue team, blah blah blah. They’re also suggesting that I – me! me! – am spinning for OLO. They’re full of crap on both counts. Here’s my (hopefully) pithy response: “I’m no fan of the OLO crowd, as everyone here knows well. That’s why you can be assured I am not “spinning” for them. The net winner this morning is Ignatieff. He was supposed to have been crushed in Vaughan, and wasn’t; he wasn’t supposed to win in North Winnipeg, and did; and no one expected him to win in Dauphin, and he didn’t.”
Tuesday, November 30th, 2010
Main author of cables in WikiLeaks release. The “intelligence community,” clearly, is neither “intelligent” nor a “community.”
Monday, November 29th, 2010
I predicted on CBC’s Power and Politics, last week, that the Cons would win Vaughan, and that the Libs had an excellent candidate in Winnipeg North. Monte and Peggy laughed at me, heartily. Meanwhile, in the Sun, I even rashly said that Julian Fantino would win “handily.” “Handily!” Well, I may have been right about Winnipeg on CBC, but I sure got it wrong about Vaughan in the pages of the Sun – I mean, blowing a massive lead of thousands of votes in two weeks, like the Vaughan Conservatives did, isn’t winning “handily.” It’s a huge embarrassment. I am ecstatic, however, that old Chretien chum Kevin Lamoureux won in Winnipeg North! Great news, and a lot of fun to follow on CPAC last night. I particularly enjoyed irritating Sheila and Meredith. Now, bon soir.
Monday, November 29th, 2010
Sunday, November 28th, 2010
|