“Warren Kinsella's book, ‘Fight the Right: A Manual for Surviving the Coming Conservative Apocalypse,’ is of vital importance for American conservatives and other right-leaning individuals to read, learn and understand.”

- The Washington Times

“One of the best books of the year.”

- The Hill Times

“Justin Trudeau’s speech followed Mr. Kinsella’s playbook on beating conservatives chapter and verse...[He followed] the central theme of the Kinsella narrative: “Take back values. That’s what progressives need to do.”

- National Post

“[Kinsella] is a master when it comes to spinning and political planning...”

- George Stroumboulopoulos, CBC TV

“Kinsella pulls no punches in Fight The Right...Fight the Right accomplishes what it sets out to do – provide readers with a glimpse into the kinds of strategies that have made Conservatives successful and lay out a credible roadmap for progressive forces to regain power.”

- Elizabeth Thompson, iPolitics

“[Kinsella] deserves credit for writing this book, period... he is absolutely on the money...[Fight The Right] is well worth picking up.”

- Huffington Post

“Run, don't walk, to get this amazing book.”

- Mike Duncan, Classical 96 radio

“Fight the Right is very interesting and - for conservatives - very provocative.”

- Former Ontario Conservative leader John Tory

“His new book is great! All of his books are great!”

- Tommy Schnurmacher, CJAD

“I absolutely recommend this book.”

- Paul Wells, Maclean’s

“Kinsella puts the Left on the right track with new book!”

- Calgary Herald

Thought for the day 

12 Responses to “Thought for the day ”

  1. jj gibbons says:


  2. P. Brenn says:

    unbeleivable…guilty , guilty guilty …

  3. lou says:

    Makes him an honorary Kennedy? No?

  4. sean mclaughlin says:

    Even if the courts find a way to fuck it up, he’s as toxic as OJ. Piece of shit.

  5. Lance says:

    And now his lawyer says the trial took a toll on his client’s health. After this mistrial there won’t be another trial. Justice will fail again. One set of laws for….oh forget it.

  6. Mario says:

    Guess the same can be said about a lot of politicians. Including Bill Clinton.

  7. Kevin says:

    At a loss. The evidence seemed overwhelming.

    Years back, a lawyer friend described the idea of a “perverse jury”, who delivered a verdict in seeming contradiction to all the evidence. Is this what she was talking about? This jury didn’t deliver a contradictory verdict, they didn’t deliver a verdict at all.


    • Kevin says:

      I think the most compelling would be the disclosure during the trial of the depositions Cosby gave about 10 years ago in which he admitted his guilt. Yup, I think that did it for me.

  8. Gyor says:

    Innocent. Her testimony doesn’t add up or make sense at and he has a witness that she’s, setting him up.

  9. Steve T says:

    Just to be a bit contrarian (and not in any way defending Cosby, or Ghomeshi), but this sort of thing is what separates us from tin-pot dictatorships with kangaroo courts. You don’t convict people based on whether you like them or not. You don’t convict people based on whether a lot of people think the accused it guilty. You convict people based on evidence, and you give everyone (regardless of how much you despise them) the chance to defend themselves.

    That being said, the court of public opinion is also a powerful thing. As Sean above states, Cosby (and Ghomeshi) will be toxic for the rest of their lives. No one should be legally able to slander them, but no one is compelled to ever do business with them again, or have them on their TV show, or even give them a job flipping burgers. Not being in jail doesn’t necessarily mean being totally free, either.

Leave a Reply