, 11.14.2017 08:20 AM

Column: when going neg goes wrong

Go neg, sure.

But don’t fib.

The Working Families group has a new ad out.  If you live in Ontario, you’ve likely seen it.  If you don’t, you haven’t.  But the ad is worth talking about, because of the issues it raises.

Working Families describes itself as a group that was “created by members of the labour movement with the goal of making voters aware of policies that were threatening the well-being of working families across Ontario.”  It doesn’t like conservatives very much.

Working Families has been around for a while.  Before and during Ontario elections, it ran lots of ads going after the Progressive Conservatives.  Even though I was the guy who ran Dalton McGuinty’s war rooms in 2003, 2007 and 2011, I can tell you that I was never a big fan.

The media assumed, wrongly, that we Ontario Liberals were secretly working with Working Families.  I’d never met the shadowy figures behind Working Families, however. I couldn’t pick them out of a police line-up – which is where most PCs thought they belonged.

Their ads, I thought, were ham-fisted and off-message.  As the Ontario Liberal war room guy, I didn’t need the media always suggesting that we were covertly conspiring with some US-style dirty tricks operation to get around Ontario election law.  But that’s what Working Families ad campaigns did, more than anything else: they made our job harder.

For Ontario Liberals, Working Families new ad campaign is going to create even more trouble.  Among other things, it’s dumb.

It’s only 30 second long, but it packs a lot of bullshit into that half-minute.

Now, it says, correctly, that Donald Trump’s election has caused “suffering.” It says, accurately, that Brexit is causing “chaos.”

But then the spot shows an unflattering photo of Ontario PC leader Patrick Brown, over ominous-sounding music.  It says he’s against marriage equality and increasing the minimum wage and working families.  “Now Patrick Brown promises change,” goes the ad.  You know: Donald Trump-style “change.”


Forget about the fact that Brown has lately marched in innumerable pride parades, now loudly favours gay marriage, and wants to see the minimum wage increased, too.  Forget about all that.

The main allegation in the Working Families ad is that Patrick Brown is basically the Great White North version of Donald Trump, the Mango Mussolini.

I’m a big fan of tough campaign ads.  I’ve put together quite a few of them over the years.  I’ve written books about them. When polled, people will always say they don’t like “negative political ads.”

But that, to me, is letting language do our thinking for us.  If you ask any sentient being if something “negative” is “positive,” they’ll obviously say no.  Nobody likes car crashes, either, I like to say.  But they always slow down to take a look, don’t they?

Because the media scrutinize attack ads like no other form of political communication – and because voters don’t want to admit they’ve been motivated by an attack – attack ads must be 100 per cent accurate.  There can’t be anything in them that is factually wrong.  Nothing.

In the 2000 federal Liberal campaign, for example, a colleague and I spent an entire day agonizing over whether the placement of an ellipsis in a quote in an attack ad was going to get us in trouble.  And it did.  The impact of the ad was lost to a ton of process stories.

The campaign crew helping out Kathleen Wynne are the ones who cooked up the federal Grits’ “soldiers in the streets” spots in 2006.  Those ads, more than any other factor, contributed to Stephen Harper’s subsequent victory.  Because they were bullshit.

The Working Families ad is bullshit.  The notion that Patrick Brown – who has voted with the Liberals on every single tolerance/diversity issue in the Legislature – is Donald Trump is, well, crazy.  And anyone making that claim, with a straight face, is either fibbing or stupid.  Or both.

Go neg, for sure.  It isn’t ever wrong to criticize the public record of an opponent seeking high public office.

But don’t lie about it. Because those rotten eggs you want to throw at your opponent?

They’re going to bounce off him, and hit you.





  1. Pedant says:

    If Patrick Brown can convince the private sector worker majority in Ontario that the Liberals are the party of, and for, the long-pampered and inefficient public service, we could be looking at a Mike Harris 1995 style blowout.

    Unfortunately I think the notion of public sector / private sector is too abstract for most voters and the message will go over their heads.

    Notice, Warren, how WF didn’t identify Rob Ford among its list of voter “mistakes”. Clearly this is due to the fact that most Ford voters in Etobicoke and Scarborough are also provincial Liberal supporters.

  2. Sean says:

    In the next provincial election, I’d like to see one of the parties have a policy to clean up the incredible mess of Ontario’s Community Colleges. There is a pile of votes to be found on that issue, from the left and the right.

  3. James Smith says:

    um, has Mr Brown flip-flopped on his minimum wage stance now too? Seems way back in September, he was telling the world the sky was going to fall @ $15, but that was September.
    BTW, as I’m a geezer, I remember the sky falling back when I was in university making $1.65 & people wanted it to zoom up to $2 an hour…

    • Matt says:

      I think Brown’s concern re the $15.00 minimum wage was/is the speed at which it goes from the current level to $15.00 under Wynne’s plan and businesses ability to adjust to it.

  4. Steve T says:

    So, just to be clear: no one can ever evolve or change their views. Right?

    Seems that would disqualify a lot of people on all sides of the political spectrum. Or does this new rule only apply to those on the right?

  5. Pedant says:

    Almost as convenient as your boy’s 180 on electoral reform after he managed to win a majority with 39.5% under the current system.

    Oh but that doesn’t count because he’s a leftist?

    • Steve T says:

      Wow, that is a Trump-worthy diversion!

      Care to answer the original question re: electoral reform? Or again, does this new scrutiny only apply outside of left-wing circles?

    • Fred from BC says:

      Right…question the leader of the Phillipines, but say nothing to China. Very brave.

Leave a Reply to Pedant Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *