Warren — Feature, Musings —03.03.2019 05:37 PM KINSELLACAST 53: #LavScam edition – the lies, the liars, the legacy 3 Comments BMarcille says: March 4, 2019 at 10:56 am Lisa is wrong: Her vote will be interpreted as an endorsement of the leader and his practices. Any other interpretation (i.e. I like my local guy) is either naiveté or a rationalization. And Warren, you make a far better interviewee than interviewer: Let the woman speak, for the love of God. Reply Warren says: March 4, 2019 at 11:19 am Fair criticism! Reply Ronald O'Dowd says: March 4, 2019 at 9:39 pm B, They have to give us a reason to stay on the train. In my case, I expect the testimony of those four before the JC. I also expect no DPA. Without both, I won’t be voting for my own party. Reply Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment * Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δ
Lisa is wrong: Her vote will be interpreted as an endorsement of the leader and his practices. Any other interpretation (i.e. I like my local guy) is either naiveté or a rationalization.
And Warren, you make a far better interviewee than interviewer: Let the woman speak, for the love of God.
Fair criticism!
B,
They have to give us a reason to stay on the train. In my case, I expect the testimony of those four before the JC. I also expect no DPA. Without both, I won’t be voting for my own party.