“Warren Kinsella's book, ‘Fight the Right: A Manual for Surviving the Coming Conservative Apocalypse,’ is of vital importance for American conservatives and other right-leaning individuals to read, learn and understand.”

- The Washington Times

“One of the best books of the year.”

- The Hill Times

“Justin Trudeau’s speech followed Mr. Kinsella’s playbook on beating conservatives chapter and verse...[He followed] the central theme of the Kinsella narrative: “Take back values. That’s what progressives need to do.”

- National Post

“[Kinsella] is a master when it comes to spinning and political planning...”

- George Stroumboulopoulos, CBC TV

“Kinsella pulls no punches in Fight The Right...Fight the Right accomplishes what it sets out to do – provide readers with a glimpse into the kinds of strategies that have made Conservatives successful and lay out a credible roadmap for progressive forces to regain power.”

- Elizabeth Thompson, iPolitics

“[Kinsella] deserves credit for writing this book, period... he is absolutely on the money...[Fight The Right] is well worth picking up.”

- Huffington Post

“Run, don't walk, to get this amazing book.”

- Mike Duncan, Classical 96 radio

“Fight the Right is very interesting and - for conservatives - very provocative.”

- Former Ontario Conservative leader John Tory

“His new book is great! All of his books are great!”

- Tommy Schnurmacher, CJAD

“I absolutely recommend this book.”

- Paul Wells, Maclean’s

“Kinsella puts the Left on the right track with new book!”

- Calgary Herald

What’s interesting isn’t that Larry Martin has written a column about the downward slide of the Trudeau Liberalslots of the other mostly pro-Grit writers are doing likewise, these days. What’s interesting is the answers he got to his questions – from an anonymous correspondent, whose identity everyone knows.

Let’s examine some of the Senior Liberal Strategist’s claims, shall we?

  • [The Ontario Liberal government’s early age sexual education policy is] hurting the brand badly in certain ethnic communities, especially in the west 905.” This is unmitigated B.S. For one thing, it recalls the efforts of Anne McLellan to blame Dalton McGuinty’s first budget for the woes of the federal Liberals, way back in the Spring of 2004.  And, as every aspiring Liberal candidate knows, it is Justin Trudeau, not Kathleen Wynne, who has made social issues - abortion, gay marriage,  sexual harassment - an actual condition of membership. Attempting to offload the blame on a single province’s Liberal government – a government that is merely doing what Trudeau himself has previously favoured – is unfair and hypocritical.
  • “We will stick to [our strategy]. We expected the Tories would spend millions around tax time and the hockey playoffs to goose their numbers. That’s what they’re doing.” Two points, here. One, if “spending millions” on advertising was all that was required to win, Mitt Romney would be president around now. What is strategic - and this is point two – is having, you know, some ideas.  Ideas are important. And they’re particularly important when all of that aforementioned advertising is focused on promoting the notion that you don’t have any ideas, and that you’re not smart enough to be Prime Minister.
  • “The horse race numbers are not very meaningful six months before an election. Ask Tim Hudak. Or Adrian Dix. Or Pauline Marois. Or Danielle Smith.” This talking point is superficially true – polls get things wrong a lot, these days.  But that truism cuts both ways: the reality may be that Trudeau hasn’t slipped as much as the polls say – or that he has slipped even more than the polls say.  That’s not all: in the case of each of those politicians – Hudak, Dix, Marois and Smith – they lost because (a) they made a lot of verbal flubs, and/or (b) they had a big lead, and arrogantly assumed it would never go away. Remind you of anyone?

To put a fine point on it: this isn’t the McGill Debating Club, boys and girls. What matters in the Liberal Party (or used to) is actual outcomes – not, you know, how clever you sound as you anonymously debate newspaper columnists.

…so I’m promoting them on the Internet to irritate her.

Step away from the Twitter.  Going after someone’s spouse – and, along the way, offering up what I hear is unmitigated bullshit – is bad for you, bad for your leader, and bad for the party you profess to support.



Screen Shot 2015-04-20 at 4.42.21 PM

This guy was sworn in as Prime Minister.  I still miss him.



…and that is just stuff from a single month, April.

Not good.

Not really. The last time a budget single-handedly sank a government was in the Fall of 1979, when John Crosbie offered up a fiscal stinker that ended Joe Clark’s flirtation with power. Other than that disaster, I can’t think of a federal budget – in and of itself – that killed off a government. 

Besides: Joe Oliver’s pretty smart. Not for him impolitical, imprudent musing about government fiscal policy. Oliver is a disciplined message machine, from what I’ve observed. He’s no ideologue, either. 

But does trouble loom on the horizon?

Mr. Oliver’s Nov. 12 fiscal update forecast economic growth of 2.6 per cent in 2015, but now he is only counting on 2-per-cent growth because of the drop in oil prices. Bank of Canada Governor Stephen Poloz said growth will only be 1.9 per cent and has warned first-quarter figures will be “atrocious.” 

 However, Mr. Poloz used the release of his April 15 Monetary Policy Report to highlight some positive signs on the horizon. The worst impacts of low oil may have peaked, he said, and the Canadian economy should soon start to see some of the positive economic impacts of lower energy costs.

Waiting to the Fall to have an election? I’ve always thought it was risky for the Consetvatives to do that. What if Poloz is wrong – and plenty of economists say he is – and things are getting worse, not better?

I run a small business. I have great people working for me, and great clients to work for. I watch the ebb and flow of business very, very carefully. And I don’t get the sense that anyone thinks that the country’s economy is in great shape. Most folks, in fact, are quite nervous. 

So, good luck, Joe Oliver. A government’s entire fate may not be in your hands. But a lot of it is.  

At least one #ableg leader knows how to do the Vulcan salute. Vote accordingly, Alberta!

This guy doesn’t just deserve to lose. He deserves to be dispatched by a Gorn.

As reader Darcy Dupas said: set phasers on stunned. 

What happens at Daisy Group on a Friday afternoon doesn’t always stay at Daisy Group.

Ekos’ Frank Graves, long derided (unfairly) as a pro-Liberal pollster, has an answer to the question above – and it should concern Justin Trudeau’s brain trust:


Says Frank:

“Harper retains an edge in terms of who Canadians see as best reflecting their values, but this advantage has diminished in recent weeks. This is an important number to watch, because ‘values’ are strongly connected to emotional engagement and party choice. Harper is seen by the largest number of Canadians as the leader best able to represent their interests; ‘progressive’ voters have been bouncing between the Liberals and the NDP on this question.”

What’s evident (to me at least) – is that it isn’t just the security/terrorism issue that works to Stephen Harper’s advantage. So does the surge in popularity for Thomas Mulcair and his New Democrats. For Trudeau, both represent a worrying trend.

Can he turn it around? If so, how?