“Warren Kinsella's book, ‘Fight the Right: A Manual for Surviving the Coming Conservative Apocalypse,’ is of vital importance for American conservatives and other right-leaning individuals to read, learn and understand.”

- The Washington Times

“One of the best books of the year.”

- The Hill Times

“Justin Trudeau’s speech followed Mr. Kinsella’s playbook on beating conservatives chapter and verse...[He followed] the central theme of the Kinsella narrative: “Take back values. That’s what progressives need to do.”

- National Post

“[Kinsella] is a master when it comes to spinning and political planning...”

- George Stroumboulopoulos, CBC TV

“Kinsella pulls no punches in Fight The Right...Fight the Right accomplishes what it sets out to do – provide readers with a glimpse into the kinds of strategies that have made Conservatives successful and lay out a credible roadmap for progressive forces to regain power.”

- Elizabeth Thompson, iPolitics

“[Kinsella] deserves credit for writing this book, period... he is absolutely on the money...[Fight The Right] is well worth picking up.”

- Huffington Post

“Run, don't walk, to get this amazing book.”

- Mike Duncan, Classical 96 radio

“Fight the Right is very interesting and - for conservatives - very provocative.”

- Former Ontario Conservative leader John Tory

“His new book is great! All of his books are great!”

- Tommy Schnurmacher, CJAD

“I absolutely recommend this book.”

- Paul Wells, Maclean’s

“Kinsella puts the Left on the right track with new book!”

- Calgary Herald

Some people wear tinfoil hats. Some see conspiracies everywhere. Some even look around at public meetings, and see spies where there are none.

B.C. NDP MLA David Eby, for instance, sees spies. B.C. Liberal spies, to be precise.

A little while ago, Eby — who seems like a nice fellow, albeit a bit paranoid — was at a meeting in Richmond, B.C. A few young folks had gathered to talk about housing, which is the subject matter of Eby’s critic role in the B.C. legislature.

A B.C. Liberal caucus researcher was there, too. She wasn’t trespassing or anything — it was a public gathering in a public place, one that had been promoted on Facebook and whatnot. The researcher recorded some of the proceedings, as researchers — and reporters, and NDP staffers everywhere — are wont to do.

Eby, however, went completely bananas about it. Later on, Eby — who (historians will note) is the guitarist for a band called World of Science, for which (the band says) he writes “sad bastard lyrics” — spared no adjective to describe the wicked, immoral and frankly Satanic presence of the young B.C. Liberal person.

It was “appalling,” he said. It was “reprehensible.” It was “a violation of the privacy rights of youth.” And so on and so on. World of Science’s sad bastard lyricist probably would have called it a war crime if he could have gotten away with it.

Except, David, it isn’t. It wasn’t. Sending staffers to the other side’s public events, in fact, has been going on since Jesus was a little feller, and you know it.

In every election campaign since time immemorial, in fact, political operatives have been quietly doing what that young B.C. Liberal researcher did. Intent on witnessing an opponent’s misstep, they are ever more showing up to capture mistakes made when the mainstream news media aren’t present. Like Shekar Ramanuja Sidarth did with the Republican golden boy, George Allen.

George Allen’s sad tale goes back to 2006, when he was seeking re-election to the Senate as the Republican standard-bearer. Allen was widely seen as a future possible presidential candidate, and he assiduously sought the support of so-called cultural conservatives — that is, those folks who want to preserve “one culture for one nation.” They’re not fussy about foreigners, particularly foreigners who don’t look like them. Allen was their (white, Christian) man.

One young man who didn’t look like Allen, but knew a great deal about him, was Shekar Ramanuja Sidarth. At the time, Sidarth — who also answered to Sid — was a straight-A senior at the University of Virginia and a Hindu. He was Virginia born and raised. Though he was studying engineering, politics was what interested him the most. He’d volunteered on a few Democratic campaigns, and by 2006 he was devoting himself to Democrat James Webb’s Senate battle.

His role was to be what I call a “road warrior”: following around the Repubican standard-bearer with a camcorder, basically. He’d capture misstatements or mistakes, and then relay them back to the central campaign in Arlington. This went on for a few weeks, and while Allen’s people didn’t particularly like Sidarth following them around — like David Eby doesn’t like to be followed around, apparently — they didn’t do anything to stop him, and mostly treated him courteously.

Until one Friday afternoon event in a park near the Kentucky border, that is. At that event, Allen did something he hadn’t done before: he singled Sidarth out. He pointed at him. “This fellow here, over here with the yellow shirt, macaca or whatever his name is, he’s with my opponent,” said Allen. “So welcome, let’s give a welcome to macaca here! Welcome to America and the real world of Virginia!”

The crowd cheered, even though some of them knew, or suspected, that George Allen had just used a disgusting slur. “Macaca” means “monkey,” and it has also been infamously used to describe African immigrants. Sidarth, who knew what the word meant, was shocked. On the resulting footage, you could see that his hand was shaking.

They’re not only allowed to be there. They’re helping democracy, too.
As with most such things in politics these days, the clip of Allen calling Sidarth a dark-skinned “monkey” eventually ended up on YouTube. Sidarth didn’t upload it himself, but he wasn’t upset about what would happen next. “This event,” he said, “reflected on Allen’s character.”

It indisputably did, and it would also indisputably end Allen’s political career. A Washington Post reporter wrote a short item about the “macaca” statement, and — within hours — the story went super-nova. Very soon, many other stories were written, alleging yet more bigoted statements or behaviour by Webb.

The conservative Great White Hope denied it all, of course, but he started to lose his double-digit lead in the polls and he never regained his footing. In November 2006, Allen lost to Webb by nearly 10,000 votes, his once-unstoppable multimillion-dollar campaign effectively felled by a quiet young man with a camcorder. Even in the old Confederate-era stronghold of Dickenson County, where Allen had made his racist remark. Even there.

Moral of the story, David Eby? Those quiet, polite young people showing up to public events and recording public statements by public figures? They’re not only allowed to be there.

They’re helping democracy, too. Ask Shekar Ramanuja Sidarth if you don’t believe me.

Oppose the neo-Nazi rag, Your Ward News? Opposed Canada post delivering I hate sheet to your mailbox? Now’s your chance to say so! Write this committee! Say NO to hate! 

  • This poll excludes Prince Edward Island, and is methodologically unsound.  Whoever is Premier there could be doing way worse!
  • How about those Raptors?
  • And, um, that’s it. 

It could be disgruntled Liberals, sure. It could be a certain ambitious cabinet minister, aided and abetted by a lobby firm and trade association he is connected to. It could be Tories or Dippers trying to cause dissent and trouble. It could be some shadowy lobby group trying to exert pressure to achieve some policy goal. It could be average folks, too – but those people wouldn’t likely be hiding their identities, I don’t think. They’d say who they are.

One thing is certain: this effort is pretty slick and there is money behind it. They’re using Nationbuilder, for example, and Nationbuilder ain’t cheap. It isn’t nothing.

I’ve got some of the smartest, web-savvy readers around. Who wants to dive into this, and try and find out who the sneaks are who are behind it?  Let’s out them, for fun!

It perhaps explains Donald Trump, Kellie Leitch et al. It also can’t be dismissed as a methodological error – the question(s) were very straightforward. 

Mostly, however, it makes me sad. We have a long way to go.