He went on to join the Royal Canadian Armoured Corps but the war ended before he could go over. He always regretted being unable to fight fascism and anti-Semitism in battle, but he taught us to always oppose all forms of hate.
We miss him every single day – and on this day, even more.
God bless him and everyone who serves.
Don’t make it about you.
That’s one of the first things we learned in journalism school. First-person writing wasn’t completely outlawed – but, if your story had “I” and “me” in it, you had to have a very good reason for it.
And: what you feel, as a writer, was irrelevant. What matters is how the people you’re writing about feel. Their feelings matter a lot more than yours.
Journalists and writers started to violate these rules in the early Seventies. Tom Wolfe, Truman Capote, Hunter S. Thompson, Joan Didion, Ta-Nahisi Coates, James Baldwin and others started to place themselves in their stories – and they started to sell lots of books and magazines and newspapers.
Some, like George Plimpton, even got into the boxing ring so he could write more vividly about boxing. The new approaches had different names: Participative Journalism, New Journalism. Traditionalists didn’t like it, but the first-person approach attracted converts.
Sitting in a darkened room at the Israeli consulate in Toronto this week, watching unspeakable horrors unfold on a screen, I – sorry – remembered these journalism rules. They created a dilemma.
How does one write about what is up on the screen without personalizing it? How does one write an account that doesn’t describe what one is feeling?
How does one do all that in a way that respects – and accurately describes – the feelings of the people on the screen?
That one was the biggest challenge of all. Because the people on the screen simply weren’t available to be interviewed. And their families – who have been living through horrors that cannot be captured in mere words, even by the likes of Tom Wolfe or Joan Didion – were not readily available, either.
They told the IDF and the Israeli Foreign Ministry that the footage could be shown to journalists, but they did not want it on the Internet, to become the fodder for conspiracy theorists and neo-Nazis.
So, it fell to 25 of us gathered at the consulate on Monday – journalists, commentators, news anchors – to describe what we were being shown, and describe its impact. The raw footage was taken from security and dashcam cameras, or devices retrieved from Hamas terrorists. It ran nearly 45 minutes.
I decided, even before I got there, that I would just describe what I saw, and avoid editorializing – save and except calling Hamas “monsters,” which is literal and not figurative. And, at the end, I described how I left the consulate and started to weep.
But I would not editorialize. If you can read about the body of a baby – brutalized and riddled with bullets – and not be moved? Well, no amount of editorializing will change you back into a human.
Before the footage was shown, Israel’s Consul-General, Idit Shamir, addressed us. “What value is there in seeing these horrific sights?” she asked, then answered her own question. “To bear witness. Sometimes, words do not do justice to crimes against humanity.”
“We show you these images to show you what Israel and the world now faces.”
So, my colleagues bore witness. Here is a sampling of what they witmessed:
• Sabrina Maddeaux, National Post: “The worst part was the glee. The pure jubilation of Hamas terrorists as they filmed themselves killing and torturing; their excited voices bragging about their atrocities…I’ll never forget the gore, but it’s the look of euphoria and pride in the terrorists’ eyes, cheering for the cameras as if they were the ones partying at a music festival that day, that will haunt me.”
• Matt Gurney, The Line: “Glee. Pleasure. Delight. Whooping cheers, selfies with the boys (carefully framed to put dead or captured Jews in the background), huge grins. The attacks were efficient, but not joyless. The Hamas terrorists are thrilled to be doing what they’re doing…And they did so with the benefit of having achieved complete surprise. That’s something else I noticed when I took the time to look past the visceral horror of the murder spree.”
• Evan Dyer, CBC: “There are numerous scenes of Hamas fighters celebrating, waving one finger in the air and shouting ‘Takbir’ and ‘Allahu Akbar.’ Jubilant and excited gunmen can be seen both leaving Gaza in the morning and returning with bloodied captives, and with the body of German festival-goer Shani Louk. Some of those images have circulated widely.The film shows Hamas hunting people at military bases, kibbutzes and at the Nova music festival…Hamas can also be seen killing injured people and shooting into rooms full of bodies and blood to kill any survivors.”
These writers, and others present that day, all remark on one thing, over and over: the utter remorselessness of Hamas. Their undisguised delight in savagery and barbarism – and the enthusiasm they showed for torture and rape and infanticide and the murder of so many innocents.
So, then, most of us present broke one of the most important rules of journalism. We wrote in the first person, and we wrote what we were feeling.
But we had no choice.
Because the bastards in Hamas had killed everyone.
October 7 was beautiful, clear day, and the sky above Israel seemed to go on forever.
It was the weekend. It was the Sabbath. It was a religious holiday.
What we saw – taken from home security camera footage, or mobile phones, or live-streaming, but mostly from the footage Hamas shot themselves, on GoPros – was so, so clear.
It wasn’t fuzzy or faded or hard to see. You could see all of it. You could hear all of it.
This is what we saw. This is what we heard.
I saw the decapitated heads of babies and children. I saw babies with bullet holes in them. I saw babies and children who had been burned until all that you could see was the outline of their little bodies, arms reaching up to God.
I saw a girl, perhaps six or seven, her tiny frame covered in blood and dirt. She was wearing Mickey Mouse pajamas. There was the body of another girl, even younger. She was still in a sun dress with blue butterflies on it. Her hands were arrayed across her chest, like little broken pieces of china.
I saw the Hamas monsters – they were disguised as men, but they were assuredly monsters – firing North Korean Type 58 self-loading rifles at cars carrying Israeli families. The windshields would crack and shatter, there would be sprays of blood and viscera, and then the cars would slow to a halt. The monsters would then pull the Israelis out, and shoot them in their heads. They did that over and over and over. Then they’d cheer and dance beside the bodies. They left behind ISIS flags, here and there.
I saw them at the gate to the Be’eri kibbutz, waiting for a resident to drive up and for the gate start to open. Then they shot the man, over and over, and then they walked inside. Once there, they crept past the small white homes. They didn’t speak. You could hear them breathing on their videos. Once or twice, they’d say: “Where did they go?” They were looking for civilians to kill.
I saw them at the rear of a home, where a child’s swing could be seen. Some music is playing. A cell phone still glows on a table. One monster reached up and sliced a window screen with a box-cutter, then shot a woman who was huddled on the floor, trying to hide.
I saw a dog, a black retriever, approach the monsters, his tail wagging. They shoot him – once, twice, three times. The dog falls to the sidewalk.
I saw a man running out of his house, carrying one son, the other son rushing ahead of them. They were in their underwear. They ran into what looked like a concrete shelter. A few minutes later, one of the monsters threw a hand grenade into the space where the man had taken his boys, killing the man. The boys go into their house, bloodied, crying out for their father. The younger one can’t see out one of his eyes, because he didn’t have his eye anymore. “We’re going to die,” his brother says.
I saw two monsters enter a kindergarten. There are little knapsacks hung neatly on the door that the monsters pass through. A woman is hiding inside a room there, under some of the pillows the children use at nap time. There’s no sound. She’s alive – and then, moments later, she’s dead, or close to it. They carry her out. We don’t see her again.
I saw another woman, hiding under a desk in a kitchen. She’s crying. They shoot her three times, and the crying stops.
I saw a man, perhaps a foreign national – dozens were killed or kidnapped that day – lying on the ground near a wall. He’s bleeding. He moves his arms, a bit. One of the monsters then takes a hoe, and starts hacking at the man’s neck, trying to behead him. “God is great!” the monster screams every time he brings down the blade on the man’s neck.
I saw a woman, dead, holding a dead child in her arms. They are in a room. It’s a bit dim. Then I see there are other dead children and adults there, too. The monsters stand there for a while, looking at the bodies. Sometimes, they fire more bullets into them and cheer.
I saw senior citizens at a bus stop in Sderot, which isn’t far from the border. They had been on a sightseeing tour, and the monsters killed them all. Their bodies were twisted on the ground, left among the canes and walkers and the dirt.
I heard a Hamas monster calling his parents in Gaza. “Dad,” he said in Arabic, “I’m talking from a Jewish woman’s phone. I killed her and her husband. With my bare hands, Dad. Dad, I killed ten, ten with my bare hands.” His mother comes on the line. “Mom, your son is a hero! Kill kill kill them!”
There was another one, caught on tape. “Let history be my witness,” he said. “That this was the first man I killed. The first one. A Jew. Give me a knife, I swear to you by God I will cut off his head.”
There was another one. Two monsters are talking about a dead Jew. “Bring him and crucify him,” one says. He laughs. “We’ve totally slaughtered them.”
I saw a man trying to escape the music festival in Re’im. He tries to hide at the rear of a car. A monster sees him, walks over, and shoots the man in the head.
I saw the Hamas monsters – all of them in military gear, top to bottom, no T-shirts or jeans or the like – take selfies with the bodies of the people they had killed at some of the 30 towns and army bases they attacked. Over and over, they’d yell: “Allah akbar!” God is great, but God does not seem to be present on this day.
At the end of the footage – 45 minutes of it, but it feels like it has gone on for 45 weeks – a first responder finds the bodies of the young people at the music festival. There are dozens of them, bloodied and splayed out in the dirt. “Is anyone alive?” he asks, and there is silence. “Give us a sign of life. Is anyone alive?” But no sound comes.
There was more, much more. About 25 of us are there, mainly journalists and writers. A woman is crying. A man I know is crying.
I go outside and my colleague Brian Lilley is waiting for me. He asks me how I am.
And then I start to cry, and I cannot stop.
It’s the weekend, so there’s going to be more demonstrations against Israel.
They’ve been happening every weekend since October 7, pretty much. There will be chants and signs and banners, proclaiming participants to be “anti-Zionist” (read: mostly anti-Semitic) and “pro-Palestine” (read: too often, pro-Hamas).
By now, everyone knows who Hamas is. They are a terrorist group who swept into Israel on October 7, and murdered 1400 Israeli men, women, elderly, children and babies. They also took more than 200 hostages.
As we say, everyone knows that. What they don’t know, too often – what the people participating in those marches don’t know – is what Hamas stands for.
It’s not hard to find out. Hamas published its “charter” for all to see back in 1988. It’s their constitution, their ultimate law.
It doesn’t disguise the reality of Hamas. And it’s really important that the people marching this weekend know what Hamas thinks of them. Here’s a short summary of the most important “articles” in the Hamas Charter.
• ARTICLES 1 AND 2: These say Hamas is an “Islamic resistance movement,” and call for a “complete embrace of all Islamic concepts of all aspects of life, culture, creed, politics, economics, education, society, justice and judgement” – as well as “conversion to Islam.” Meaning, only Muslims are truly welcome in Palestine – and Hamas’ rules apply to every aspect of every person’s life. No exceptions.
• ARTICLE THREE: If you’re in Hamas, you are required to “rid the land” – kill, mainly – people who are “unclean, vile and evil.” That is, anyone who isn’t like them.
• ARTICLE SIX: This one says the goal is Islamic rule “over every inch of Palestine.” Anything else spreads “evil, schisms and wars.” If you’re not properly religious, “there is no life” for you.
• ARTICLE SEVEN: This is an important one. Hamas says it wants its control to “spread all over the world,” not just Palestine. It calls Jews “Zionist invaders,” and calls for Jews to be killed, wherever they are hiding, “no matter how long it will take.”
• ARTICLE ELEVEN: Hamas and its ilk are entitled to take back Palestine “by force.”
• ARTICLE TWELVE: Women and slaves are talked about in this article – yes, lesser beings like slaves are permitted in the Hamas caliphate, and women are considered lesser beings, too. They can “fight the enemy,” however.
• ARTICLE THIRTEEN: Pro-Palestinian types may want peace, but Hamas doesn’t. Ever. It calls them “so-called peaceful solutions and international conferences [that] are in contradiction to the principles of the Islamic Resistance Movement.” It says they are “a waste of time.” Peace talks only help “the infidels,” says Hamas. All that is permitted is “jihad” – that is, holy war.
• ARTICLE FOURTEEN: It is “a horrible mistake” and “a sign of deep ignorance” to question jihad against the Jews. Ridding Palestine – and the world, see above – of non-believers is “an individual duty for very Moslem wherever he may be.”
• ARTICLE FIFTEEN: Pro-Palestinian educators, professors, educational unions take note: there will be “changes in the school curriculum, to cleanse it of the traces of ideological invasion” caused by Christians, Jews and non-Muslims generally. It’s “a duty.”
• ARTICLE SIXTEEN: This article is similar. The main textbook is to be the Koran and materials only from “authentic sources.” Only “specialized” people will be allowed to teach. There will be permitted study of the weaknesses of the Zionist and Christian “enemy,” however.
• ARTICLE SEVENTEEN: This is a really important one. It’s called “The role of the Muslim woman.” It’s pretty simple: the role of women is to make babies, ideally male babies. “She is the maker of men.” Hamas’ enemies try to manipulate their baby-makers with films and school curriculums,” but also – and this is a quote – “Freemasons and Rotary Clubs.” They “are all nothing more than cells of subversion and saboteurs.” When Hamas runs everything, they “will be obliterated.”
• ARTICLE EIGHTEEN: Women are supposed to “look after the family,” full stop. Women are expected to follow Islamic principles every day. Their role is “performance of housekeeping matters.”
• ARTICLE NINETEEN: Art is important, but only if it is Islamic art. “The book, the article, the bulletin, the sermon, the thesis, the popular poem, the poetic ode, the song, the play” are acceptable if they are “Islamic.”
• ARTICLE TWENTY: Jews are “similar to Nazis.” They are “vicious.” They permit homosexuals and transsexuals, apparently, “making no differentiation between man and woman.” Not allowed.
• ARTICLE TWENTY-TWO: Jews “took control of the world media, news agencies, the press, publishing houses, broadcasting stations…They were behind the French Revolution, the Communist revolution and most of the revolutions we heard and hear about, here and there. With their money they formed secret societies, such as Freemasons, Rotary Clubs, the Lions,” as well as World Wars, the Balfour Declaration, the League of Nations, and on and on. “There is no war going on anywhere, without having their finger in it,” says Hamas.
And so on and so on. We could go on, protestor-types, but perhaps a picture is emerging. If you’re a woman, or a girl, or LGBTQ, or a believer in free speech, or just someone who has a faith that is different from theirs – well, they don’t want you.
And, in some cases, they will kill you, too.
“I never really knew much about Jews until this year.”
That’s what Dana Remillard Kreil wrote in one of her essays, which ended up in court. She went on:
“In other grades, all I was told was that the Jews are a RACE that are discriminated against. They had never had a fair chance. But not one of the teachers ever stopped to tell me of their TRUE origin. This year I learned of their origin and their wicked plans, and I am very scared that the world is going to fall to them. I only hope that we Christians will be strong enough to fight off their Satanic hate.”
Another kid, Gwen Mathews, read out some of her class notes at the preliminary hearing. “Christ told the Jews: ‘Your father is the devil, you are the children of Satan.’”
She went on: Jews secretly ran the French Revolution, and they had what they called the “Feast of Reason: They carried aloft a number of prostitutes. They would strip her and lay her on the altar. Then they killed an innocent girl, and poured the blood on the hooker. Then they cooked the girl and ate her.”
There’s a lot more of that, if you have the stomach for it. It’s what Gwen and Dana were taught. Not in Nazi-era Germany. But in Canada – Eckville, Alberta, to be precise – for many years.
Their teacher was the former mayor of Eckville, Jim Keegstra. In his social studies class, Keegstra taught kids for 14 years that the Holocaust was a hoax, that there was an international Zionist conspiracy, and that Jews are the biblical descendants of Satan.
If all of that sounds a bit like the sort of belief system propagated by Hamas, you’d be right. And if it also sounds not unlike the sort of vile anti-Semitism now manifesting itself around the planet – on university campuses, in the streets, everywhere online – you’d be right about that, too.
Jim Keegstra was ultimately prosecuted, successfully, for promoting hatred against Jews. His case went all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada, and he lost. Keegstra died on June 2, 2014, which – as I wrote at the time – was the day that Hell got that much more crowded.
How did he do it? How did Jim Keegstra get away with preaching Jew-hatred to children – much in the way that Hamas and its ilk now do? How?
Lots of reasons, as it turned out. Inadequate classroom supervision. Disregard for the approved curriculum. But, as it turned out, something else: geography.
There were no Jews in Eckville, you see. Not one. And the nearest synagogue was two hours away, in Edmonton.
This writer was working for the Calgary Herald in the Keegstra years. I met and interviewed him, and many of his followers – which included the majority of his students, even after his trials.
And that is what struck me, over and over. Jim Keegstra was successful in teaching students to hate Jews because there were no living, breathing Jews nearby. He could make Jews into whatever he wanted, and he did.
Right now, at the back end of the year 2023, we are witnessing the biggest resurgence of anti-Semitism since the Second World War. You don’t need a poll to prove it. It’s the truth.
Also true: hatred is the product of ignorance. Hatred flourishes where education is absent.
That is why what the Doug Ford Government of Ontario has announced this week is so, so important. Like other provincial governments of differing stripes, it has declared its intention to ensure that students are taught better about the Holocaust.
Other levels of government, in other places, need to do likewise. As we saw in the Keegstra scandal – as we are now seeing around the world – anti-Semitism is flourishing in those places where Jews are vastly outnumbered, or where they no longer exist.
“I never really knew much about Jews.” That’s what Dana Remillard Kreil said, so many years ago, in Alberta. It tells us the way out.
We are all in a dark and dangerous place. The way out is truth. The way out is education. The way out is learning that Jews are human, like humans everywhere.
In his Merchant of Venice, Shakespeare put it best. His main character was a Jew. And this is what that character famously asked:
“If you prick us [Jews], do we not bleed?”
I have never seen it this bad.
And I’ve seen it when it is really, really bad. But never like this.
Anti-Semitism, that is. Hatred and/or prejudice towards Jews.
Some context, here. As a journalist, I have been writing about, and researching, Jew-hatred since 1986. As a lawyer and a citizen, I’ve been opposing it for almost as long. I’m not Jewish, but I’m a Zionist – that is, I favor re-establishing the Jewish homeland that existed long before Christ.
Now, over the years, I’ve seen a lot of anti-Semitism. It’s hard to forget.
An Aryan Nations fanatic – who believes Jews are the literal descendants of the devil – jammed a rifle in my chest at his group’s compound in Caroline, Alberta in 1987. When I worked for Jean Chretien in the early Nineties, the RCMP didn’t wanted me traveling with the Liberal leader, because I posed an added security risk – too many neo-Nazis wanted me dead, they said.
Some neo-Nazi skinheads planned to firebomb my place in Ottawa, resulting in several weeks of on-site police protection in 1994. A Ku Klux Klan leader gained access to my place in Vancouver in 1997, necessitating even more security and a vacating of the premises.
Online threats and attacks from Holocaust deniers Ernst Zundel and David Irving, and their fans, in 2001. Lots of those.
And, in 2018, a Toronto anti-Semite publishing a “newspaper” which talked about me being “bludgeoned to death.” (I successfully pushed for a private criminal prosecution in that case – and Judge Dan Moore let the Nazi go.)
And so on and so on. I’ve written five books about racism and anti-Semitism, hundreds of newspaper columns and stories, and I’ve been on the receiving end of lots of death threats over the years. I’ve spent plenty on security – and, yes, I’ve learned how to be a really good shot.
And in all of that time, after experiencing all of that nonsense and more? I’ve never seen it this bad.
If you’re a Jew, you know exactly what I mean. Anti-Semitism, which never really goes away, is seemingly worse now than it has been in decades. And Jew-hatred – which is now manifesting itself in unlikely places like university campuses, and small businesses, and elementary schools, and restaurants and private residences – is just about everywhere. It’s the new pandemic, and deadly in its own dark way.
In Toronto alone, there’s been a 132 per cent increase in anti-Semitic incidents since October 7, when Hamas murdered 1400 Israeli men women and children – and raped and tortured many more. Think about that: after October 7, the worst day Jews have experienced since the Holocaust, things got worse for them. Not better.
Things got worse everywhere, in fact.
Pollsters and social scientists are at work, computing the data, assembling the grim statistics. Police agencies are tallying the depressing numbers. But all of us – all of us who pay attention, anyway – know the truth: anti-Semitism, always bad, is getting markedly worse at the back end of 2023.
In media newsrooms, we are all talking about it. At this newspaper, one of our writers got roughed up at an “anti-Zionist” protest on Sunday – told he worked for a newspaper run by the Jews. And, for those of us who are in the business of predicting the future, it feels like blood will be spilled – and not in Gaza City or an Israeli kibbutz, either.
Here. Now. It feels like someone is going to get killed. It feels like there will be blood.
Israel will win the war against Hamas, yes. It will be long and it will be bloody, yes. Of that there should be little doubt.
But, elsewhere, it feels like Israel – the Jewish state – is losing. Online, in cities across the West, in public opinion, perhaps: it feels like Israel is losing another kind of war.
It’s not irrelevant when we see more than 100,000 protestors marching past the British House of Parliament on the weekend, demonizing Jews and the Jewish state. It’s not irrelevant when Ph.Ds are joking about Jewish babies being beheaded or cooked in ovens. It’s not irrelevant when Jews are afraid to go outside their homes – in Canada.
Now, more than ever, those who support Israel – those who oppose terror and hate – need to fight back. We need to be seen, too, and we need to confront every barbaric lie and every blood libel. We need defeat anti-Semitism. As we have done before.
The rough Beast, per Yeats, is again awake, and it is slouching towards Bethlehem.
We must defeat it. We must.
Places of higher learning?
Places that are stomach-churning, more like.
We refer to campuses all over North America, of course. Since October 7, far too many students at university, college and high school campuses have blamed Hamas’ victims, not Hamas. They have promoted hatred, not opposed hatred.
On Wednesday, thousands of students at more than 100 universities across the United States and Canada protested “fascists and Zionists,” said the World Socialist Web Site.
In Canada, police were called in to escort Jewish students at McGill University, away from a big anti-Israel protest. Security has been enhanced to protect Jewish students at three British Columbia universities: UBC, Simon Fraser and U Vic.
Three York University students’ associations published pro-Hamas statements, and refused to retract, even after it was pointed out that Hamas raped, tortured and murdered more than 1,400 Jews – and kidnapped hundreds more. Thursday, hundreds of high school students walked out of classes across the Toronto District School Board to wave Palestinian flags and attack the Jewish state.
And this short summary doesn’t even include the multiple death threats and assaults that have been happening on campuses across North America – motivated by Jew-hatred.
Why is this happening?
Bad parenting, possibly. Hateful professors and instructors, to be sure. But, more than any other factor, Generation Z – that is, those born in 1996 and later – are being targeted by anti-Semitic and extremist organizations online. And the statistics tell the disturbing story.
• According to a poll conducted by Harvard University (which itself has had no shortage of anti-Semitic student activity), more than 50 per cent of Americans between 18 and 24 believe Hamas’ pogroms were “justified.”
• Where are those young people getting their information? From the Chinese-regime-run TikTok. TikTok is the search engine they use, more than Google or any other. The European Union, unlike Canada, has demanded this week that TikTok detail the efforts they are making to curb pro-Hamas propaganda. So far, TikTok hasn’t responded.
• When one U.S. researcher engaged with just one TikTok post on the Israel-Hamas war, his feed was almost immediately overwhelmed with anti-Israel messages. He looked at the resulting data, and found that “TikTok is being controlled by anti-Israel bot farms – much of which is paid for by Hamas-supporting organizations.”
• If you look even deeper, you can see why Israel is losing the information war among young people. Among the ever-important hashtags, for example, “Stand With Israel” got two million views. Meanwhile, “StandWithPalestine” got an extraordinary 37.7 million – almost twenty times as many.
• It gets worse: because TikTok is now so overwhelmingly anti-Israel, its engagement flywheel – which online platforms use to increase momentum and profit – encourages more and more anti-Semitic content to attract eyeballs.
This, perhaps more than anything else, helps to explain why white, affluent, under-educated high school students who have never set foot in Israel – from San Francisco to Toronto – have embraced extremist messages. Their primary source of news and information is a sewer pipe for Jew-hatred.
This writer has written in the past that TikTok needs to be banned in the West because it has been shown to be a tool used by the Chinese regime to destabilize democracy. It is a real and present danger.
So too, now, with our young people. Right now, the minds of our youth are being poisoned with toxic, hateful messaging – messages that are deeply and unabashedly anti-Semitic. Not enough is being done to counter it.
The Nazi propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels, once said this: “Think of the press as a great keyboard on which [we] can play.”
Well, the press has since been replaced by TikTok and its ilk. It has been replaced by digital devices which every single Gen Z kid carries with them.
And it is like a snake, spitting lies and hate.
Decisions.
That’s all the voters are looking for, really. They know that they are not going to get their way on every single policy decision.
So they all want just one thing from their political leaders: decisions. Clear, coherent, concise decisions.
This writer worked for a leader like that: Jean Chretien. He won three back-to-back majorities not because he was universally loved, or even that his priority was being universally loved.
He won every single election he contested over a 40-year political career because he knew how to make a decision. That’s it. Because that’s the job. It’s simple.
Al-Qaeda attacked America on 9/11, and Chretien did not hesitate. He made a decision. He said we would go with America to fight Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. We did.
Later, George W. Bush wanted to wage war against Saddam Hussein. Chretien told him to wait until he had proof of weapons of mass destruction. Bush wouldn’t wait. So, Chretien made another decision: we would not join the Americans in Iraq. For them, it turned out to be a quagmire.
Decisions. At a time of war, being able to make a decision – being able to stake out a clear position – is essential. Human lives depend on it.
So, on the eve of the anniversary of Chretien’s massive election victory, we were treated to the spectacle of a Liberal government that can’t make a decision. Our so-called Minister of Global Affairs called for “a humanitarian pause” in the fighting in Israel and Gaza.
On the very same day – the same day! – Canada’s Minister of National Defense (correctly) labeled Hamas a terrorist organization, and (properly) said that they must be destroyed.
Which is it? A humanitarian pause, or destroy them? What’s the decision, Trudeau Liberals?
The Trudeau Liberals are not alone in their apparent fondness for sucking and blowing at the same time, however. Here’s a sampling.
• Trudeau initially said Israel had a right to defend itself, “in accordance with international law.” A couple days later, several of his Liberal MPs openly contradicted him and issued a letter calling for a ceasefire. None have been disciplined.
• CBC, the Toronto Star and even the New York Times claimed that Israel had bombed a hospital in Gaza. It hadn’t. The hospital is still standing, and there were no 500 victims. But have the Star or CBC expressed regret for their decision to effectively blame Israel? No.
• The Ontario NDP stubbornly defended one of their own after she refused to back down from statements that many considered anti-Semitic. A few days later, they decided to kick her out of their caucus.
• Canada’s Ambassador to the the United Nations, Bob Rae, rightly and courageously called for Hamas to be destroyed. The hopeless and hapless Joly, meanwhile, instead called for a “de-escalation.” If 1,400 of your family and friends were raped, tortured and killed – if hundreds of them were kidnapped – would you be telling the victims to “de-escalate” and suck it up? Or would you favor pursuing and stopping the wrongdoers? You know the answer.
• António Guterres, the Secretary General of the United Nations, properly condemned the brutal attacks of Hamas. Then, in virtually the same breath, he said that Hamas’ rampage “did not happen in a vacuum” – and added that the Palestinians have been subject to over 50 years of “suffocating occupation.” Get that? Condemn the bad guys – and then say the bad guys weren’t acting “in a vacuum.”
And so on and so on. It’s enough to make you ill. (Actually, it does.)
We are going through a dark and dangerous time. We are on the precipice of things getting worse before they get even worse.
At such a time, we need the sort of leadership Jean Chretien showed: clear and coherent and concise decisions. The ability to decide.
We’re not getting that.