"...[Kinsella is] a modern-day Machiavelli, the mastermind who ran war rooms for Jean Chretien and Dalton McGuinty... He's the ultimate political insider... [The War Room] has plenty of fascinating insights and is a must-read for political junkies."
- The Toronto Sun
"The top Canadian spin doctor...tells all!"
- The National Post
"Warren Kinsella’s new book is a must-read for anyone interested in political campaigning in Canada. And not just political campaigning.…I wish I’d had the chance to read The War Room before I became Stephen Harper’s campaign manager; it might have saved me from many mistakes and months of painful learning on the job."
- Tom Flanagan, The Literary Review of Canada
"The War Room is a rich, detailed, and substantive primer on how to run a winning war room - warts, pizza boxes, smelly couches and all - from a master war roomer."
- The Hill Times
"Kinsella has crafted a handy little guide for politicos and non-politicos alike. Just keep it away from the kids."
- The Winnipeg Free Press
"... a great read ... full of fascinating stories..."
- John Moore, CFRB
"...I don't want to say [he's a] genius...but there's valuable insights here..."
- John Oakley, AM640
"I just got one copy, but I plan to get more!"
- John Wright, Ipsos, CFRB
"I do recommend [The War Room] to everyone."
- Charles Adler, Adler Online
"He's Canada's James Carville...a must-read...If you really want to win, you need this book!"
- Tommy Schnurmacher, CJAD
"A fascinating book...full of great stories."
- Ken Rockburn, CPAC
LIVE FROM CBC, REAL SERIOUS-LIKE AND STUFF
Warren 'Warren' Kinsella prepares for an interview on CBC Radio's 'The House' with Kathleen 'Not Kathy' Petty, for broadcast tomorrow. Warren is furrowing his brow to fool you into thinking he is intelligent. It was CBC, it was radio, and it seemed like the thing to do at the time.
And here's what I told her about: Ignatieff vaults Liberals into tie with Tories, poll suggests (Poll-Ignatieff)
Source: The Canadian Press
Jan 9, 2009 15:00
OTTAWA - A new poll suggests the Liberal party has bounced back into contention now that Michael Ignatieff is at the helm.
The Nanos Research survey, provided exclusively to The Canadian Press, suggests the Liberals have moved into a virtual tie with the governing Tories.
Liberal support stood at 34 per cent, one point ahead of the Conservatives and up eight points from the Liberals' dismal showing in the Oct. 14 election under the leadership of Stephane Dion.
The poll suggests the Liberal resurgence was particularly pronounced in Quebec, where the party vaulted into the lead with 39 per cent support to 29 per cent for the Bloc Quebecois, 17 per cent for the Tories and 14 per cent for the NDP.
The telephone poll of 1,003 Canadians was conducted Jan. 3-7 and is considered accurate within 3.1 percentage points 19 times in 20.
A voter honeymoon with Ignatieff, who was hastily installed as leader last month, appeared to be the driving force behind the Liberal bounce.
(The Canadian Press)
THE TRUEST MIDDLE EAST PIECE YOU WILL READ
DON'T BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU READ
THE GLOBE'S STEELE NAILS IT
Bang, bang, bang.
And, when Andrew says I am "many things," he wants to say that I am "sexy" and "a hunk," but Radwanski cut it out.
Oh, and Flames rule.
and other reasons. What a star.
SHOULD YOUR TAX DOLLARS BE USED TO SEND BLOGGERS ON JUNKETS?
I'm not entirely clear on all of the details, but it seems that the Department of National Defence is paying for a Conservative Party advocate, Damian Brooks, to go to Afghanistan.
As far as I am aware, this is a first, and it raises a number of fair questions - such as, was his unrelenting love of the Harper Administration a factor in selecting him? Who
selected him - DND staff, or the Minister's Office? What is the cost? Where is he going, and why? Is this a new program, and how
is it being funded? Should
such junkets be funded, in the midst of a national recession?
Full disclosure: I've crossed swords with Damian before, when he suggested that I was happy - or, at least, not unhappy - about the death of a Canadian soldier. Being the son of an officer, as I am, I wanted to rip his lungs out for that one. But things cooled down thereafter, and we haven't paid much attention to each other.
I (unlike what he
said in respect of me)
do not doubt for a minute his support for our Armed Forces. I applaud his support of our men and women in uniform, and I share it.
I just question, however, whether it is appropriate that our tax dollars are being used to fete him around. UPDATE: A Maclean's writer
thinks it's a good idea. Here's why.
JOBLESS NUMBERS FAR WORSE THAN EXPECTED
...and in Ontario - where Jim Flaherty infamously told people not to invest - the jobless numbers are worse.
Meanwhile, from the Prime Minister - on the suffering of thousands of Canadian families facing hardship, as well as on the ongoing conflict in the Middle East - we have heard nothing. Zero, zippo, zilch.
These guys are going down.
REASON 1,068 I SUPPORT THIS GUY
A couple of Conservative Party publicists
are claiming to be upset about Liblogs,
because a couple of pseudonymous pre-pubescents have been trying to publish anti-Israel crap there. (And, I note, notwithstanding the the fact that Liblog's administrators are promptly removing any group libel the moment it appears on that aggregator.)
Now, not to minimize "anti-Zionism" - which, as all of you know, I have written books about, making the point, inter alia, that "anti-Zionism" is almost always a P.R. flak's weasel term for "anti-Semitism"
- but why all this attention for a pair of anonymous teenaged kooks, hmmm?
Could it be because a Conservative Member of Parliament has recently issued a press release,
stating that Israel "hurts and targets innocents"?
That's a quote! Suggested headline: "CONSERVATIVE M.P.: ISRAEL TARGETING THE INNOCENT."
Speaking of which, does anyone have an info on that Alberta MP, perchance, so we can pass it along to Messrs. Levant and McParland?
The two of them are all about fairness and balance, and I'm confident they'll get right on it.
In case some of you are wondering whether I am incapable, now, of giving the Harper Administration credit about anything, let me give them credit for one thing: this little-noted exchange between the Prime Minister and Maclean's editor Ken Whyte (which, oddly, is on their web site and dated 11 days in the future):
Q: Will the government amend the Canadian Human Rights Act to prevent unwarranted interferences in free expression by human rights commissions?
A: The government has no plans to do so. We're certainly aware of the issue. My understanding -- we've been monitoring this closely -- I think you'll actually see there's been some modification of behaviour on the part of the Canadian human rights commissions. The most egregious cases right now are mostly at the provincial level. And it is a very tricky issue of public policy because obviously, as we've seen, some of these powers can be abused. But they do exist for valid reasons, which is obviously to prevent public airwaves from being used to disseminate hate against vulnerable members of our society. That's a valid objective. It's probably the case that we haven't got the balance right, but I'm not sure the government today has any answer on what an appropriate balance would be.
It's not terribly Christian of me, but I would hope that answer - particularly the bolded stuff - gives coronaries to the knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathing, red-necked libertarian blogosweird.
It is, however, me exercising free speech! Ha!
HOW THE CONSERVATIVES RECESSION-PROOF THEIR CRONIES
There was the Christmas-break orgy of Conservative patronage, and now - according to this morning's Globe
- there's even more to come.
The minority Harper regime sure is looking a little panicky, these days. Desperate to cling to power, the former Reform stalwarts are jamming the Red Chamber with its hacks and flacks - thereby doing precisely what they said they'd never do.
Thereby putting power ahead of their supposed principles. Thereby becoming what they swore to change. Stephen Harper, sir, you had an option. Remember when your friend said that?
Of course you do.
LET FURY HAVE THE HOUR, ANGER CAN BE POWER
...that's what Kathy Shaidle is,
with filth like this. Maclean's
Mark Steyn and the National Post
champion her, however. "Christian" publications publish her.
Man, some days I really wish we did
have hate laws in this country, insteading of just pretending
that we do.
CUPE AND SID RYAN NEED TO SEE THIS
<<First <Back | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | Next> Last>>
BOY, CONSERVATIVES SURE ARE GREAT ECONOMIC MANAGERS, AREN'T THEY?
URGENT US Budget Deficit, (URGENT-US-Budget-Deficit)
Source: The Canadian Press
Jan 7, 2009 9:25
WASHINGTON - Congressional estimators are projecting an unparalleled American budget deficit of US$1.2 trillion for the 2009 budget year.
A top congressional aide briefed on the estimate says the Congressional Budget Office also sees a $703 billion deficit for 2010.
The dismal figures come a day after President-elect Barack Obama warned of trillion-dollar deficits for years to come.
CBO's figures don't account for the huge economic stimulus bill that Obama is expected to propose soon to try to jolt the economy.
Obama officials say the stimulus measure will blend tax cuts with big new spending programs and could cost up to $775 billion over the next few years.
(The Associated Press)
INDEX: BUSINESS ECONOMY INTERNATIONAL POLITICS