In Tuesday’s Sun: the Maple Leafs Syndrome

It’s the Toronto Maple Leafs Syndrome. Applies to sports as well as politics.

The Maple Leafs, as you may have heard, are a hockey team.

They have not won the Stanley Cup since 1967. That was the year the Beatles released Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, Rolling Stone magazine started publishing and movie tickets were about the same as the minimum wage — just under a buck-50.

So, think about that: The Toronto Maple Leafs — one of the most profitable franchises in professional sports — won the Stanley Cup for the last time in 1967. Nearly a half century ago.

In Montreal (where I was born), in Calgary (where I grew up), and in Vancouver (where I took leave of my senses and made an ill-fated run for Parliament), this is what would happen if the Habs, the Flames or the Canucks were shut out for nearly 50 years — there would be riots.

There would be unrest. There would be revolution.

In Toronto? Nothing happens. No one cares.

Mild-mannered, mid-level executives in the financial services shrug. Well-appointed corporate executives check their Rolexes and yawn. (None of them are paying for the tickets anyway.) In the memorable phrasing of Stephen Harper (who loves the Leafs, by the by), they couldn’t care less.

That, in a roundabout way, explains why Torontonians don’t rise up, en masse, and surround City Hall. And then tie “Mayor” Rob Ford to one of the subway cars he professes to love so much, and drag him out to Etobicoke, the Toronto suburb that inflicted him on us in the first place.

In any other city in Canada, Rob Ford would be hanged, drawn and quartered (and, in his case, quartered and quartered again). He’d be tarred and feathered, and run out of town.

He would be reviled by children, and cursed by church-going grandmothers.

He would be — in any other city, where sanity still matters — dreaming about how Don Cherry used to refer to him as a friend.

Not in Toronto. No, sir.

In Toronto, to the amazement of those who are passing through (like me), people still pose to get their picture taken with Rob Ford.

At a protest to demand his ouster — which I attended, my first protest since my salad days — the biggest applause was reserved for a comedian, who told the good-humoured crowd that Rob Ford “is just like you.” No one seemed very angry, at all.

He may be a crackhead. He may drink and drive. He may give the finger to children and consort with drug dealers. He may push around people who are smaller than him and he may use gutter language to describe his wife. But Torontonians voted for him in droves in 2010 — and polls tell us that a significant number of city residents would do so again.

In these unique circumstances, residents of saner parts of the country — like Montreal, Calgary or Vancouver — might be moved to conclude the source of the Rob Ford problem isn’t, in fact, Rob Ford.

It’s the people who put him in office. It’s Torontonians themselves, afflicted as they are by Maple Leafs Syndrome.

In Toronto, you can put crap on the ice, year after year — you can put trailer park trash in charge of the city — and Torontonians will keep doing what they always do about things that are a joke, a farce, a source of bottomless shame.

Which is, mostly, nothing.


Our Daisy colleague Edwige kicks Kid Kodak’s ass!

Our amazing colleague Edwise Jean-Pierre has been fighting the good fight against the pompous, preening, persecuting Ontario Ombudsman, who has never met a camera lens he didn’t like. From the Ottawa Citizen story about her ongoing battle for justice:

OTTAWA — The Office of the Ontario Ombudsman, which investigates public complaints about provincial government services, is facing allegations of discrimination from a former employee.

In an interim decision dated Nov. 13, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario dismissed two complaints against Ombudsman André Marin’s office, but agreed to hear a third complaint filed last year by former receptionist Edwige Jean-Pierre.

Jean-Pierre, a black woman of Haitian and Congolese descent, was born and raised in Ottawa and is a graduate of the University of Ottawa. Now a resident of Toronto, she is also an actor and playwright of some repute.

In her complaint to the tribunal, Jean-Pierre alleged two primary incidents of discrimination…

A co-worker emailed a poster to office staff soliciting participation in fundraising for the annual Run for the Cure cancer event. It provided examples of services employees could auction, including being “slave for a day.” The poster graphic showed several Caucasian men clutching and waving what appeared to be dollar bills.

The poster felt like “a slap in the face,” Jean-Pierre told the Citizen on Friday. “Of course, being from the African diaspora, I found it really offensive.”

She said the incident was “the straw that broke the camel’s back” after two years in what she called a “toxic environment.”


Torontoist: who to talk to, and not, about Crackhead Mayor. Also: I’m on Sun News tonight – right after the Fords

Their list is here.  It’s funny but completely wrong.  Totally wrong.

Print folks don’t understand TV very much.  They don’t understate the dichotomy between TV and print.  Print is about information; TV is about emotion.

That’s why, as no less than John Doyle has said, Sun News Network made a smart move in signing on the Ford freaks for a few weeks.  As I told blogger Queen Bathurst last night:

“My main objection to the [Newstalk 1010] radio program was that they clearly screened calls. I felt that that was against the CRTC rules. In the case of the TV show, the show will be taped, and will have no callers as such. Because Ford has said that he will be registering as a candidate in the first week of January, their new program can really only last six weeks. I do, however, look forward to both of these idiots falling flat on their face, and potentially providing more ammunition for those who are seeking their ouster. 

Given the legal circumstances in which they find themselves, I predict that their participation in this program will end very, very badly for the Fords. That makes me very happy.”

“[Kory Teneycke is] setting him up to fall. Only Ford’s too stupid to realize it.”

I will be on Brian Lilley’s show immediately after Ford Nation tonight.  Tune in.  I will have a few things to say.


SFH: We’ve got a mayor on crack!

When SFH did this tune, a few months back, he and his Ford Nation denied it.  Thus, the two lawyers in the band added a question mark at the end of the song title – I mean, would they lie about something like that?

They did, they did – and the whole world is noticing! Even SNL!

Oh, and Rolf (the guitarist) is going to win Brandon-Souris.  Just watch.


Late night sex ed talk

[Son Two, Lala and I are discussing the differences between the public and separate school boards. And how, in my opinion, the latter is much more expansive about sex education than the former.]

Son Two: It’s totally true. I was asked to define masturbation, and I gave a long answer.

Me, intrigued: How long?

Son Two: Half an hour. I could have gone longer, but Ms. [Name redacted] told me I could stop talking.

[Much stifled laughter from the adults.]


In Sunday’s Sun: “law and order” and “conservative” don’t belong together anymore

Law and order Conservatives? Don’t make us laugh.

After the fall we’ve had, the notion that Conservatives possess even passing acquaintance with “law and order” is a pathetic joke.

Conservatives, large and small “C,” always like to tell us that theirs is the ideology of law and order. You want a candidate to get tough on crime? Vote for us, they say. (Same with taxes. They claim they cut taxes. That, too, is a charade, but a column for another day.)

Conservatives have been peddling their “law and order” flim-flam for a long time.

Richard Nixon, aided and abetted by Ronald Reagan and Barry Goldwater, used the “law and order” nostrum to propel himself into the Oval Office.

Once there, he and his Watergate cabal broke every law in the book, and Nixon, facing impeachment, resigned. Oops.

Still, conservatives try. “Law and order” and its companion farce, “tough on crime,” are terrific on the campaign trail when you’ve got little else to say. Progressives get tongue-tied on crime, believing (correctly) that we should be building more schools, not more jails. Conservatives love to advocate their unswerving devotion to the law, however, because voters believe (incorrectly) that violent crime is getting more prevalent. (Added bonus: It’s a terrific way of demonizing non-whites, without coming right out and saying it.)

Up here in the Great White North, the two leading proponents of “law and order” are well-known.

One has been Stephen Harper, prime minister of all of Canada. The other has been Rob Ford, the mayor of the largest city in Canada. On crime, both are literally has-beens.

Harper’s story is notorious nationally. His three marquee Conservative Senators of the Apocalypse — Duffy, Wallin and Brazeau — are all under police investigation. They are alleged to have committed fraud and breaches of trust — in effect, they are being probed by the Mounties for having allegedly swindled the very taxpayers their party professes to hold in such high regard.

Their cases are important, because they were appointed to the Senate by Harper and because Harper made them stars on the Conservative fundraising circuit. Their cases are also important because the grubby Senate scandal revelations have thrown the Harper government into months and months of turmoil.

That’s nationally.

Internationally, the Conservative “law and order” mantra has been exposed as a lie by none other than Toronto Mayor Rob Ford.

We say “internationally” because Rob Ford is the most (in)famous Canadian of all time. Everywhere you go on the planet now, people know all about Toronto’s crack-smoking Conservative mayor. Forget about Anne of Green Gables and hockey, folks — our national symbol is now a porcine right-winger, allegedly huddled in a backroom at a bar, allegedly snorting something with an alleged hooker.

Every week brings delightful new developments on the Rob Ford front. Last week, my amazing colleague Michele Mandel broke the news that — according to interviews his own staff gave to police — Ford allegedly:

– Drove Toronto streets, filled as they are with taxpayers, after consuming a mickey of vodka.

– Assaulted members of his own staff while drunk in his taxpayer-funded office.

– Took drugs in said taxpayer-funded office, while taxpayer-funded staff watched.

– Snorted the aforementioned substance with the aforementioned hooker, while taxpayer-paid staff looked on, and darkly warned bar staff not tell anyone what they’d seen.

And so on. And that’s just this week, Canada!

Progressives like to say they are better at stuff like education, health care and helping those who need help. They are.

Conservatives have long liked to say that they are “tough on crime,” and that they are way better on the “law and order” stuff.

Thanks to Stephen Harper’s gang — thanks, in particular, to a drinking-and-driving Rob Ford — they can no longer do that.

Conservatives tough on crime?

Don’t make us laugh.