My Trudeau column

…found by my intrepid colleague Rob (and in the Citizen database, not the Post’s).  Not sure how he found it, but he did.

***

A brush with political greatness: Meeting him was inspiring, recalls Warren Kinsella.
The Ottawa Citizen
Fri Sep 29 2000
Page: A19
Section: News – Argument & Observation
Byline: Warren Kinsella
Source: Citizen Special

In November 1982, a hundred lifetimes ago, I was a student at Carleton University’s School of Journalism, and a member of the editorial staff at The Charlatan, the school paper. I was also a Pierre Trudeau Liberal.

Although journalists, and journalism students, are supposed to be scrupulously neutral, I was then (as now) decidedly partisan. I could not help myself. I had grown up in Calgary, and was drawn to the Liberal party because I believed (as I do now) that only a strong, central government could serve as an effective bulwark against Quebec nationalism.

Back then, only Pierre Trudeau’s Liberal Party possessed the necessary fortitude and conviction to confront Quebecois secessionists, I thought.

The xenophobia manifesting itself in the burgeoning Western separatist movement also nudged me towards the Liberals. At the time, legitimate concerns about the National Energy Program were degenerating into a morass of anti-French, anti-immigrant, anti-Eastern bigotry. Among the nation’s political leaders, only Mr. Trudeau seemed capable of making the case for federalism.

And so, there I was, 22 years old and a card-carrying Liberal, representing The Charlatan at the Liberal party’s biennial convention in Ottawa. On the day set aside for a speech by Mr. Trudeau, a fellow journalism student and I were loitering in a hallway at Hull’s cavernous Palais du Congres. My friend, Michael Galway, was a gregarious Newfoundlander. I think he was probably a Liberal, too. In any event, as we were chatting with a couple of elderly women — also from Newfoundland — a huge commotion could be heard in the vicinity of the escalators. Michael and I spotted a mass of klieg lights, reporters and cameramen (they were all men, in those days) coming our way. At the centre of it all was Pierre Elliott Trudeau, the Prime Minister of Canada.

Him. Without warning, Galway and I and the two women were abruptly at the centre of the scrum. And there, standing not very tall at all, was Mr. Trudeau. Grinning at us, as if he were not surrounded by dozens of lights and lenses and lackeys.

“Hello,” he said.

Now, in the intervening years, I have met, and worked for, many political leaders — other prime ministers, cabinet ministers, party bosses, senators, premiers, mayors, city councillors. And in all of that time, I cannot recall anything similar to what happened when I met Pierre Trudeau.

And what happened is this: Everything — and I mean everything — seemed focused, entirely and properly, upon and within a single man. The air, the sounds, the lights — all were right where I was looking. And where I was looking was at Mr. Trudeau.

Like all Newfoundlanders, Galway had a greater facility with language than I. He didn’t miss a beat, and assumed the role of a tour director.

“Mr. Trudeau,” he said in the lilt he had, “here are two nice Liberal women from Newfoundland who wish to meet you.”

Mr. Trudeau laughed (a bit) and graciously shook the hands of the women, both of whom were gushing and blushing.

Then Galway pointed at me.

“And over there is my friend Warren, who is from Calgary, but is a Liberal, too. He worships the ground you walk on!”

I was mortified — horrified — by what Galway had said. While all of what he said to the prime minister was true, I didn’t think an intellectual giant like Pierre Elliott Trudeau would have much use for a political groupie. But he gave me a minute or two, which at the time seemed an eternity.

“So you are a Liberal and Calgarian,” he said to me. “We need more like you.”

I cannot remember what I said, but I know it was not very clever. It was probably some strangled attempt at thanks. He moved on, trailing lights and journalists. I punched a laughing Galway in the shoulder.

Every so often — when something like Meech Lake inflicts itself on the public agenda — I remember that day in November 1982 when Michael Galway and I met Pierre Trudeau. And I marvel that such a giant of a man existed, let alone as Canada’s prime minister.

Just a couple weeks ago at lunch, I tried out my Pierre Trudeau theory on Richard Gwyn, the author of the best biography of the man.

Mr. Trudeau was, I told Mr. Gwyn, someone who we all aspired to be — he was cosmopolitan, bilingual, almost other-worldly. He made us feel we were capable of greatness, notwithstanding our comparative size and meagre global influence. We embraced him, in a way, because he was unlike us. Because he embodied the things we wished to achieve for ourselves, and our children.

“Not a bad theory,” said Mr. Gwyn, who was too polite to remind me that I was not the first to think of it.

Warren Kinsella is a lawyer in Toronto, and a former adviser to Prime Minister Jean Chretien.


Ten years ago

I wrote something in the Post about the sad passing of Pierre Trudeau ten years ago today, but I can’t find it.  Anyway: I, we, still miss him very much.

Here’s a memorable clip of John Lennon – also sadly gone, thirty years ago in December – talking about Pierre Trudeau.  If you look carefully, you can see the late, great Romeo LeBlanc shepherding  John and Yoko into a room to meet the press.

Long time ago.  Time goes too fast.


Important announcement

For immediate release

September 28, 2010

KINSELLA MAKES IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT

TORONTO – Toronto lawyer and consultant Warren Kinsella today announced that he is making an important announcement about something.

Responding to weeks of speculation and an outpouring of concern, Kinsella said that he could not delay announcing his plans any further.

“Look, I can’t hide from the facts,” said Kinsella.  “At the start of August, I was up at the lake with the kids and wrestling them on Splash Island, a water trampoline kind of thing, and something went wrong.

“I was winning the King of Splash Island fight, that’s for sure, but I’m pretty sure I fractured my index finger.  I’ve tried to ignore it, and hope that it gets better, but the damn thing hurts like a bastard.”

Kinsella added that he will bow to weeks of pressure from loved ones, and get the damaged digit X-rayed this morning.  He will not be taking calls from the media, or speculate about what this means for his finger’s immediate future.

“I want to thank the media and the public for allowing my finger, and my other fingers, to focus on healing and closure at this time.  I only ask that we be granted privacy to be together at this challenging time.  Thank you.”

– 30 –


Corruption and Maclean’s

Martin Patriquin is one of the biggest scumbags in Canadian journalism. This week, we’re going to be hearing all about Patriquin, because he has written Maclean’s cover story, which looks like this:

If that seems familiar to you, that’s because it is.  Here’s another Maclean’s cover story, also written by Patriquin:

So, not only is he scumbag, he’s not very original.  He’s also a phony, turns out.

Here’s what Patriquin wrote in the National Post on January 5, 2007: “Sorry, I’m not going to blog. Life, any life, is just far too mundane a spectacle. With any luck, the journalist blog trend will follow the faux-hawk into the giant dumpster of bad ideas and everyone, journalists included, will figure out the advantage of knowing when to shut up.”

Uh-huh. You guessed it: here’s Patriquin’s blog, in Maclean’s. You know, the one he said he’d never do, because it’s a “bad idea.”

My personal experience with Patriquin is not dissimilar.  He reprints Conservative Party talking points, is regarded as a cynical no-talent by his more-accomplished colleagues, and sends over-refreshed emails to people in the middle of the night.  He thinks he’s clever, but he isn’t.  He’s a loser.

So how is it that he’s employed at Maclean’s? Beats me.  But the magazine also retains the services of Mark Steyn, so that might have something to do with it.  Steyn, as you know, is a former disc jockey who calls the Chinese “chinks” and “gooks,” the Japanese “japs;”  Indians “wogs;” natives “Injuns;” Muslims “monkeys” and rapists, and so on. He also suggests the disabled more or less got what they deserved in 9/11. Birds of a feather publish together, I guess.

Anyway.  As Norman Spector has pointed out, Patriquin’s “story” declines to provide the reader with a study – any study – that proves that Quebec is “the most corrupt province in Canada.”

They won’t, either, because no such study exists.  Patriquin just made it up, and someone at the magazine went along with it because they thought they’d dazzle a few more dentist waiting rooms with their wit. Personally, I hope every person in Canadian public life – and every person – kicks the living shit of Matrin Patriquin and his magazine this week.  They richly deserve it.

Oh, and corruption?  Corruption is defined as “a lack of honesty or integrity.”

By that definition, the rest of us know who is really corrupt, don’t we, Martin?


Against Me! Joy

Shot by me whilst my daughter and I were lucky enough to be backstage, two Saturdays ago.  At the encore, Tom walks out alone, acoustic guitar in hand, and this is what happens.

All’s quiet, except for this song.
So maybe while I’m not together, I can feel like I’m not alone.
And somewhere off in the distance, rapidly advancing, is an onslaught of sorts.
Young sirens wail in a skewed sense of glory.
And the lions in the cages roar at the memory of fight.

And there’s a joy, a joy in all I can see.
A joy, in every possibility.

And all around us is a great, great failing.
American rockets red-glare in a most
disgusting triumph.
And in passing I am asked “Do you believe in a God?”
I shrug off the answer, continue to get high.
In this terror of no explanation,
I am looking for a faith.
My panic is an only reason.

There’s a joy, a joy in all I can see.
A joy, in every possibility.


Toronto race: your morning’s quotable quotes

“Jodi Shanoff, an Angus Reid senior vice-president, said the poll’s 36 per cent of undecided respondents shows “this race isn’t over yet” despite Ford’s “significant” lead. “I believe many voters and observers continue to believe some kind of an implosion is coming.”” (Toronto Star, David Rider, Sept. 23)

“As is always the case with the politics of anger, those who support Ford are also those who will suffer by him. You get what you pay for, but lower taxes mean fewer services; and it’s the poor who need them most.” (Toronto Star, Christopher Hume, Sept. 23)

“But no one’s listening…As long as he and the electorate remain focused on the anger — and the fear that underlines it — the debate need go no further.” (Toronto Star, Christopher Hume, Sept. 23)

“On the other hand, unlike the majority of his supporters, Ford doesn’t lose sleep over money. “I don’t need this job,” he assured Galloway. “I have been very fortunate in life.” He was referring to the fact that he is a rich man thanks to Daddy (Douglas Ford)” (Toronto Star, Christopher Hume, Sept. 23)

“Smitherman still hasn’t given voters a clear idea of why he wants to be mayor — other than the job of premier wasn’t available.” (Toronto Sun, Editorial, Sept. 23)