Important query

In Kingston with my Mom and the girls. Mom just observed that I have a “nonchalant” way of walking.

My question: “Is there a chalant way of walking?”

Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?


Name the combatants

Blogging Tory versus Progressive Blogger? Hatfield versus McCoy? Elizabeth I and Mary Queen of Scots? Stalin and Trotsky? Norman Mailer versus Gore Vidal? Harper versus, well, just about everyone this Summer?

Trippy tune, freakazoid characters. Best vid I’ve seen in a while.

Dancing Pigeons – Ritalin from Blink on Vimeo.


James: great column on how to make Toronto great

James: How do we make Toronto great? Here’s how

July 30, 2010 20:07:00

Royson James
Star Columnist

Good ideas lie trampled on Toronto’s mayoralty track — lost in the stampede of criticism that drives the political rhetoric of an election campaign.

But how do you make Toronto great?

The way forward should have a blueprint that promises a great city — one that values community and equity and respects citizens and their taxes. It does not slash and burn. It does not smash; it builds. But it has no sympathy with ideologues and seeks no partnership with councillors who put their interest above their constituents’.

Here’s how it can be done.

Regain public trust

Before a mayor can ask Torontonians to sacrifice and dream about a city of great transit, social equity and excellent service, the office must regain public confidence.

The past seven years should be a lesson not lost on future politicians. David Miller rode into office on a broom, a symbol of a city’s desire to clean city hall of corruption. That he did. But he also allowed his friends on council to destroy the citizen’s faith in city hall. How?

Council took pay hikes themselves while they cut the salaries of senior staff, put workers through a controversial strike, approved tax hikes above inflation each year, and initiated new taxes on cars and property sale.

Councillors refused to cut their office budgets, using the money to feather their nests, fund pet projects, engage in image-burnishing events, support sports teams, dress up in bunny suits, buy expensive espresso machines and outrageously high-priced Christmas cards.

And when challenged by citizens, the council voted to use tax dollars to defend themselves — even when the city solicitor told them the move was illegal.

Worse, the mayor refused to stand up for the citizens, allowing his council to dodge behind fine legal and policy interpretations. For example, when a Beach family, supporters of Miller ally Sandra Bussin, managed to get an exclusive deal from the city to manage a waterfront food business, the mayor remained mum, even though the deal was clearly not in the interest of the taxpayer.

To end this era, the winning mayor would pledge to:

• Freeze council salaries for four years, as the $100,000 they make is a fair wage; cut the office budget to between $30,000 and $40,000, from the current $53,000 a year; cut off those self-promoting, tax-funded ward councillors’ newsletters at the first quarter of an election year; and, finally, obey the law and not fund legal bills for court challenges to councillors’ election campaign finances.

That accomplished, citizens may begin to believe that city council is no longer a safe harbour for arrogant lifers with a sense of entitlement. And candidates will no longer gain traction with a one-issue campaign that taps into this discontent.

Help us feel better about city spending

The city’s budget is the second arm of the corrosive force at city hall, and the most difficult to repair. Some citizens will never believe their money is being spent wisely. They resent every tax dollar they pay. The aim is, don’t give them any more supporting evidence. And give the rest of us reason to feel good about city hall spending.

A winning mayoral platform would promise to:

• Give citizens a property tax freeze in year one as the administration reviews programs, tightens the budget and sets the spending template for the term.

• Approve inflationary tax increases after that, to maintain services that make Toronto thrive. There’s no need to add more police, as we have enough; maintain ambulance and fire services; bolster areas where we’re falling apart.

• Declare the TTC an essential service. Examine outsourcing of garbage collection (and other appropriate services), holding some levers to ensure the city is not held hostage by the contractor.

• Secure the essentials of a fiscal deal with the province, tell citizens how much they have to pay to maintain services, and end the incessant squabbling with Queen’s Park over downloading.

• Equip the auditor general with enhanced resources to target fraud and wasteful spending.

Boost democracy

Citizens report a feeling of disconnection to city hall, especially in the suburbs. A winning mayor must engage the suburbs and bring their representatives into the power positions at city hall. Symbolism is not enough. Electoral reform is needed.

• Set in motion electoral reforms that will be in place by 2014. Indicate some essential elements of the reform that must be studied to deliver a more open, accessible, diverse, representative and equitable city hall.

• Favour a governance model that gives communities more direct control and influence over strictly local decisions, including a budget for local improvement. Eight to 12 such “communities” seem ideal. Elect councillors to represent each “community” on the big city council; and give that politician a seat on the city’s executive committee — along with the mayor’s appointees.

• Support the right of all Toronto residents to vote in municipal elections, citizenship notwithstanding.

• Limit councillors’ time in office to 12 years, or three terms.

• Allow voters to rank candidates on an election ballot and deliver a result where winners don’t take office with as little as 20 per cent of the vote.

• Promote diversity initiatives among councillors that mentor under-represented groups at city council. The female politicians are doing this for women. Visible minorities need similar advocates.

Stop shoddy service

Nothing infuriates as lastingly as poor service. The bus should run on time. The garbage must be picked up every time. Fix the potholes. Cut the grass. Paint the traffic lanes. Do as much road construction at night as possible, not during rush hour.

• Hire the Star’s Fixer, empower him to get action, and offer his reports free to all newspapers — just to keep the bureaucracy honest.

• Hold bi-weekly accountability sessions with senior staff to demand service improvements and fixes to broken service reported by citizens. To have kids wait two years to use the water slides at Christie Pits is unacceptable. If it needed to be fixed for G20 officials, it would have been done forthwith.

Build more transit

Do the above and citizens will be in a better mood to shell out the coins needed to build transit in Toronto. Lethargy, wrangling and inaction have put us years behind where we should be. Now transit is the city’s biggest nut to crack over the next 20 years. Depending on Queen’s Park will give us just what we’ve had for the past 20 years.

• Implement a wide range of funding tools dedicated to transportation. These include road tolls, a1 per cent sales tax, fare by distance, and new parking systems that make things easier for drivers. For example, GPS-based systems can track where you park, figure out the fee and end the need to run back and forth with payment. Time of day discounts, or higher rates, can be built right in.

• End the measures that infuriate drivers. Encourage a sharing of the road, minus the “war on the car.” Put bike lanes where they make sense, not to score political points.

• Support laws that give bikes a wide berth, promoting safety; encourage cycling and walking in high pedestrian zones.

• Encourage private-sector ideas on funding and operating subway lines. For example, solicit proposals for the looping of the two north-south subway links along Sheppard. This creates an awesome relief for the Yonge line.

Help struggling neighbourhoods

One of Mayor David Miller’s greatest legacies will be his compassion for the city’s priority neighbourhoods, areas often passed over.

A mayor worthy of support won’t forget such Torontonians — from the homeless to people living in social housing and in less than ideal conditions.

• Support the Lawrence Heights revitalization, trading on lessons learned from Regent Park.

• Continue funding special recreational, employment and community-building programs that engage youth in poorer neighbourhoods.

Plant more flowers

Toronto appears cleaner today than five years ago. But so are the downtowns of all our North American rivals for tourism and business. Returning to where we were no longer scores us points.

What might excite and spark a city-wide collaboration and transformation is a campaign to make Toronto a garden city.

Imagine a civic initiative that challenges every street, neighbourhood and community to double, then triple, then quadruple the flowers they plant over the next term of office.

City hall will set the example by dressing every city-owned building with flowers and shrubs. What if each of the city’s 44 wards were challenged to do five community projects, half with public money, half with private donations, and the entire lot with the city’s encouragement and assistance? Think of the pride, the competition to outdo the neighbouring ward, the public participation, the amazing transformation of our city.

It wouldn’t take much for the city to double, triple, quadruple output at the High Park and Centennial greenhouses, where they produce more than a million flowers and 150,000 native plants each year. Corporate sponsors would gladly chip in.

Any office complex, church, union hall, bank, community centre, restaurant, retail establishment that can, should be urged to participate. Ones that can’t afford to buy their own flowers and shrubs could get seedlings and flowers from the city’s own greenhouses.

School properties — now a disgraceful blight on many neighbourhoods — would be prime targets for the transformation. Citizens could be encouraged to adopt orphan space.

From the ground to the condo balcony, a city in bloom would signal a city at peace with itself. This would improve Toronto’s livability and create a splendid tourist attraction. Best of all, it increases community involvement and civic connection at a time when city hall is far too remote from people’s lives.

Email: rjames@thestar.ca


I didn’t i-Stand in i-Line for i-Phone

Notwithstanding my admittedly ridiculous behaviour on the morning the iPad came out, I did not line up all last night to be one of the first to get the new iPhone. Instead, my daughter and I hung out on Queen West and got additional body piercings.

One of my lawyers/besties is in Los Angeles, this morning (happy birthday, Kill For You), and he wants to get one.  He says he’ll pick one up for me, but I think I’ll wait.

There have been too many stories about too many iPhone 4 problems for me to jump into the deep end of the pool on this one.  This represents an unusual moment of restraint and maturity on my part.  It doesn’t happen very often.

What about you, Internet?  Anyone line up last night?  Anyone waiting, like me?

iComments are i-open.


Thursday morning bits and pieces

  • RIM copies Apple, Apple copies RIM:  It’s just me, but I’d recommend the two companies stick to doing what they already do very well: RIM manufacturing a terrific device for email, Apple manufacturing terrific touch-screen computer thingies.  I’m not sure they advance their corporate interests by providing a pale version of what the other guy does better.
  • The Giorno Factor: I know Guy and I like him.  I don’t agree with his views on many, many subjects, but he’s a smart cat. The notion, however, that he’s really the Prime Minister, and not Stephen Harper, is mistaken.  Chiefs of Staff are important, but nobody should be under the impression that The Boss is anything other than The Boss: that has always been so.  The character and focus of the Harper government  is determined by Stephen Harper, not his employees.  It was thus for Messrs. Martin, Chretien, Mulroney et al., too.  Remember the names of all of their Chiefs?  Exactly.
  • Goofy story of the day: If John runs, does anyone seriously believe he wouldn’t have the support of his sons? Give me a break.  And, BTW, thanks for messing with the Festival of Joy, guys.  I’ll get you for this.
  • Buck-buck, yawn: The chicken suit thing is so tired and old and hackneyed, states like Nevada have even banned them near polling stations! Personally, I’m all for getting your youth wing folks to tackle the chicken and pluck off his/her outfit.  If nothing else, it’d be entertaining, and possibly provide a free lunch.
  • GritChik: Great new web site.  The fact that she says nice things about Yours Screwly may naturally colour my judgment.  Chik her out!

Johnny, come lately

Sun headline writers are the best.  No debate.

Strobel:

Johnny, come lately.

Better lately than never. But step lively. We need you, real bad.

We need your charisma. (I can’t believe I just said that. John Tory is to charisma what a Habs fan is to table manners.)

But, man, this mayoralty race sucks.

It’s silly. It’s given me a headache and a recurring nightmare in which David Miller smirks, proclaims ‘what the hell, this’ll be a cakewalk’ and rejoins the fray. I awake in a cold sweat.

So, jump in, John. The water’s warm.

Five good reasons right off the bat: George Smitherman, Joe Pantalone, Rocco Rossi, Rob Ford, Sarah Thomson. Ten others:

1. You’ll win.

2. We Canadians appreciate losers who don’t quit. Classy, likeable losers. The Jamaican bobsled team. Joe Clark. You, John.

In Toronto, especially, losing is no shame, it’s just good experience. We’ve lost more Olympics, world’s fairs and hockey games than you can shake a stick at.

Yet Ivanka Trump sashays into town this week to tour her daddy’s new skyscraper, calls us “one of the world’s greatest cities,” and we beam.

So what if you’re 0-for-3 against David Miller and a couple of measly provincial Liberals?

They sure giants compared to this lot. My neighbour’s chihuahua could be mayor in a romp, except he’s busy crapping on the sidewalk. But he would not beat you, John.

3. Run now, and Rob Ford can gracefully bow out and retake his council seat in Etobicoke.

We do not want Mayor Ford. Sorry, Rob. It’s just not your schtick. Your destiny is to be our civic balloon-pricker, our ant at the City Hall picnic. Boss of a megacity? Uh-uh. Keep pricking.

Mayor Tory would actually heed you, not sneer at you like Mayor Miller’s pinkish mob.

4. Headline writers will love you, JT. “Tory.” It’s short and snappy and has many rhymes. Gory, sorry, glory, quarry, lavatory. John Tory Is Hunky-Dory.

Smitherman? Too long. Here’s the headline: Furious George Fizzles Out.

Plus, a skinhead hasn’t won anything meaningful since Mussolini. That also bodes badly for bald Rocco Rossi. Sarah Thomson? Or is it Thompson? Ford’s a good headline name. In the car section.

5. You’re media savvy. (Let’s ignore your PR pratfall on religious school funding from Queen’s Park).

Your radio spot is good training. We know we’ll hear your calming voice in times of crisis. We haven’t heard from the incumbent since, oh, last fall, which is maybe just as well.

6. Sandra Bussin. Remember her “anonymous” crank call to your show to defend pal Miller? I would pay to see her face at your first council meeting.

Mayor Tory: “Chair recognizes ‘Sandra From Toronto.’”

Counc. Bussin: “Actually, I don’t work for the city.”

“Then what the heck you doing here?”

“Beats me. But good luck to you, John, because you’re a three-time loser. And I don’t see you being successful in the future.”

“Next.”

7. I just can’t take another TV debate with these idiots. They wail, moan, gnash teeth, throw napkins and gang up on each other. Which is fine, if you’re running for mayor of your daycare. I can’t imagine you sticking out your tongue, John Tory.

8. You’re not a bully like Smitherman and that incumbent guy. You’re not a tax-and-spend zombie like Joe Pants. You’re not a slob like Rob. You’re not a backroom boy like Rocco. You’re not a…whatever Sarah Thomson is.

9. I know you’ll reverse those moronic bike lanes on Jarvis St. and Eastern Ave. I just know you will.

10. Mike From Toronto will vote for you.

Run, Johnny, run.


A case of importance

Full disclosure – I have a personal interest in this case, which involves abuse going back many decades.  But I think the hearing tomorrow will be quite important.  Also worth reading: this Globe story, from this morning.

Canadian Press:

Lawsuit alleges people abused, held in toilet at Ontario institution (Institution-Abuse)
By Ciara Byrne
THE CANADIAN PRESS

TORONTO _ As a little girl in an Ontario institution for the developmentally disabled, Pat Seth was turned upside down in the toilet as staff poured cold water on her face after she refused to eat her porridge, the now 52-year-old said Tuesday.

Ontario Superior Court Justice Maurice Cullity is expected to give the formal go-ahead to a class-action lawsuit Wednesday involving Seth and thousands of others who are suing the provincial government.

The former residents of Huronia Regional Centre and family members are alleging systemic neglect and abuse at the facility for more than 100 years.

The allegations have not been proven in court and the Ontario government has not filed a statement of defence.

“We got sentenced. We are the disappeared,” Seth said during a phone interview Tuesday, comparing her childhood years at the Orillia, Ont., facility to a prison term.

“(We were) isolated from the outside world. We were sentenced for being mentally handicapped and it wasn’t fair,” said Seth.

The institution opened in 1876 under the name Orillia Asylum for Idiots, and became “a prison for individuals with disabilities,” said David Rosenfeld, one of the lawyers representing the plaintiffs.

When the facility closed its doors in March 2009, Huronia was the oldest institution for people with a developmental disability. In 1971 the facility housed 1,875 residents.

Over the years, there were allegations of neglect and abuse made against the institution. There were also several deaths.

In the 1960s, an article described the facility as overcrowded, with beds so close people were lying head to head.

By 1971, a report by Walter B. Williston sponsored by the Ministry of Health, condemned the institution, describing situations where adults were left rocking or aimlessly walking the halls, while others were organized into work gangs. The findings eventually led to another scathing government-sponsored report in 1976, which led to the replacement of the administrator of the facility at the time.

“These class members were put into this institution, almost like a prison, and forgotten about by the rest of society,” said Rosenfeld.

Marilyn Dolmage, who worked at the centre between 1968 and 1973 as a social worker, is acting with her husband Jim as a litigation guardian for the lead plaintiffs Marie Slark and Pat Seth.

Both Slark and Seth were admitted to the institution in the 1960s at the age of six and seven, as wards of the state. At 16, Seth was placed in a group home on the premises of Huronia until she was 21.

“It was an awful place to live. It was like living in jail. It was restricted there was no freedom,” said Seth.

Seth alleges residents were hit with brushes and fly swatters.

“We weren’t allowed to retaliate, because if we did we would be dragged across the floor by the hair of our head,” Seth said.

Dolmage said she remembers the institution operating like an “army camp,” children and adults lined up and followed orders.

“There was a constant fear, especially little children like Pat, I recall her as a very cute little girl _ tiny,” said Dolmage.

“They told me about their fear and suffering and the kind of punishment they had.

Ontario was once home to 16 institutions. Beginning in 1987, the province moved to close them and place residents in community settings.

The Huronia of the past few decades was a very different place than it used to be, advocates have said. They were vibrant communities where the residents had dances and parties, they say.

But Community Living Ontario has said while the institutions became cleaner and better maintained, residents were still subject to isolation and separation from society, therefore necessitating the institution closures.

INDEX: NATIONAL SOCIAL JUSTICE POLITICS