11.30.2010 05:40 PM

Blogging Tories ITOW – latest

More such filth here.

Messrs. Harper and Hudak should reconsider their association with these lunatics.

But they won’t.

13 Comments

  1. Googling last night while looking at the returns on the by-election and came across this Blogging Tories exchange – http://www.bloggingtories.ca/forums/viewtopic.php?p=92018

    thurmas

    Joined: 04 Aug 2009
    Posts: 197

    votes: 1

    Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 3:11 pm Post subject:
    being a winnipeger I can tell you it is a super ghetto riding full of undesirables, poverty stricken natives, gangs, drug dealers, teen aged mothers ect… it encompases winnipeg’s north end which is as bad as vancouver’s east side if not worse. I really doubt a tory would win there in 50 years. We might have a shot at Bill Blaikie’s old transconna riding though in the next election.

    ***********************************************************

    This response was posted by another blogger,

    ***********************************************************

    Blacksmith

    Joined: 29 Nov 2010
    Posts: 2

    Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:55 pm Post subject:
    thurmas wrote:
    being a winnipeger I can tell you it is a super ghetto riding full of undesirables, poverty stricken natives, gangs, drug dealers, teen aged mothers ect… it encompases winnipeg’s north end which is as bad as vancouver’s east side if not worse. I really doubt a tory would win there in 50 years. We might have a shot at Bill Blaikie’s old transconna riding though in the next election.

    Gee, thanks cretin.
    As a Conservative, that lives smack dab in the middle of this so-called “ghetto” I can say without hyperbole that it is moronic comments like yours that turns people away from the conservative party.
    Perhaps, just perhaps, the NDP or the Liberals don’t treat the area residents like second class citizens and that is why they, in turn, vote for them.

    I’ve lived here for over 17 years now, it’s not the nicest of neighborhood but I know friends who live in places like St. Vital who have been broken into and robbed far more often than I have. (I’ve been broken into twice in that time, compared to 6 times for my friend).

    If, and I mean IF the conservative candidate actually came to the area once or twice (it did Ms Javier NO help that she was a no-show to several town hall meetings here) they might actually think that the Conservative vote was an option.

    Sadly, this is the last place they think of as being “worthwhile” so their votes suffer for it.

  2. Iris Mclean says:

    Not sure, but if Harper and Hudak were to alienate all these jerks, wouldn’t they lose a pile of votes to the CHP?

  3. Riley says:

    The way you beat the Cons is to drag the idiots out into the open. Demonstrate that they are the real face of the conservative party. Don’t run against Harper … run against Ezra Levant.

    • Ted says:

      In 2000, the Canadian Alliance (led by Stock Day and Ezra Levant) tried to run against Warren Kinsella, even had a website up about him.

      When hunting bear, don’t get distracted by rabbit tracks.

  4. Rob says:

    That is a great blog. Sunlight is the best disinfectant (as a learned judge once said).

  5. Michael S says:

    I suspect the federal election will be in the spring, before the Ontario provincial, for two reasons.

    1. It’s easier to win in Ontario if the other guy is in power provincially.
    2. Turnip truck’s gonna be spillin’ fierce come fall.

  6. Dman says:

    A BIG thanks to you Warren Kinsella for exposing the massive HYPOCRACY of the Tiny TinMan Tim Hudak and Stevo HarpoCrit DUO.
    Unfortunately, I suspect that many mainstream voters would find the suggestion of even a tenuous link between this DOU and the worst of the Blogging Tories totally flipping unbelievable … as to actually believe any such link exists could & would seem to shatter the value system of many mainstream voters.
    Kudos to MCBellecourt for making a most rational & compelling case for a common sense credibility standard.

  7. S. Peterson says:

    And then there is Tom Flanagan who tells us he would shoot the Wikileaks guy if he could. What a charming bunch.

  8. MC Bellecourt says:

    Flanagan’s statement, I mean. I hit the reply button in the wrong spot. My bad.

Leave a Reply to MC Bellecourt Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*