“Warren Kinsella's book, ‘Fight the Right: A Manual for Surviving the Coming Conservative Apocalypse,’ is of vital importance for American conservatives and other right-leaning individuals to read, learn and understand.”

- The Washington Times

“One of the best books of the year.”

- The Hill Times

“Justin Trudeau’s speech followed Mr. Kinsella’s playbook on beating conservatives chapter and verse...[He followed] the central theme of the Kinsella narrative: “Take back values. That’s what progressives need to do.”

- National Post

“[Kinsella] is a master when it comes to spinning and political planning...”

- George Stroumboulopoulos, CBC TV

“Kinsella pulls no punches in Fight The Right...Fight the Right accomplishes what it sets out to do – provide readers with a glimpse into the kinds of strategies that have made Conservatives successful and lay out a credible roadmap for progressive forces to regain power.”

- Elizabeth Thompson, iPolitics

“[Kinsella] deserves credit for writing this book, period... he is absolutely on the money...[Fight The Right] is well worth picking up.”

- Huffington Post

“Run, don't walk, to get this amazing book.”

- Mike Duncan, Classical 96 radio

“Fight the Right is very interesting and - for conservatives - very provocative.”

- Former Ontario Conservative leader John Tory

“His new book is great! All of his books are great!”

- Tommy Schnurmacher, CJAD

“I absolutely recommend this book.”

- Paul Wells, Maclean’s

“Kinsella puts the Left on the right track with new book!”

- Calgary Herald


Flaherty, plugged

(EDITOR’S WARNING: If you are a federal Conservative, this column may make you faint. You are advised to immediately locate the smelling salts and lay down on the couch before proceeding any further.)

Yes, folks, it’s true: I am about to say something nice about Finance Minister Jim Flaherty. Me, the resident Bolshevik at Sun Media. Me, the guy who never met a Conservative he didn’t like.

Here goes: Over the past few days, in which economic turmoil has left quite a few of us feeling exceedingly nervous, Jim Flaherty has been doing a not-bad job. A good job, even.

There, I said it.

In the wake of Standard and Poor’s idiotic downgrade of the credit of rating of the United States –  and in the wake of the ongoing debt crisis unfolding across the European Union –  Flaherty has been a voice of calm and rationality. Through it all, the Lilliputian finance minister has done what he should have done — he reminded everyone our economic fundamentals are rock-solid. Our banking system is secure. Our lending practices are sane. Our economy is turning the corner. And, unlike the U.S. of A., we still have a triple “A” credit rating. We are in good shape.

Now, don’t get me wrong. Flaherty isn’t perfect. Economic historians will forever remember him as the minister who took a structural fiscal surplus, left to him by the governments of Jean Chretien and Paul Martin, and turned it into a structural deficit. He will always be remembered as the politician who, circa 2008, arrogantly dismissed those who suggested (a) a recession was imminent and (b) it would hammer Canada. For those two blunders alone, Flaherty deserves criticism aplenty.

But, throughout the recent spate of troubles, it can’t be denied: Flaherty has been conducting our economic affairs with a certain degree of skill. And that is why you haven’t seen the opposition New Democrats or Liberals howling for his impressively sized head. They know Canada is a middling power, at best, with little or no ability to affect the currents and eddies of international markets. Few pay us any heed.

So a Canadian finance minister must always been a shrewd manager of words, as well as dollars. And that is why Flaherty has been focused — like his capable provincial counterparts in Ontario, Quebec and B.C. — on assuring citizens that, while we are not immune from the world’s economic ills, we are also in comparatively good economic shape. That has been his job, and he has been fine with it.

But big, big challenges lie ahead. If the European contagion spreads, as some expect — and if presidential-year political gamesmanship continues to hurt prospects for a rebound in the U.S. –  then Canada, too, is facing another 2008-style recession. And maybe worse.

For Jim Flaherty, that would present a formidable dilemma.

Flaherty and his boss, Prime Minister Stephen Harper, have insisted it is imperative we pay down the whopping deficit that grew (necessarily) out of post-recession stimulus spending. Both men have been resolute in saying economic stimulus is at an end, and we must all begin to tighten our belts. Both men gave every impression government cutbacks, and program cuts, were inevitable.

But what if we are heading back in downward spiral, towards a recession that would be far, far worse than 2008? And rest assured, it would be worse. So is it advisable to start cutting back on the very programs which help Canadians in tough times  and, even worse, to start talking about cutting taxes for the very big businesses which got us all into this protracted mess in the first place?

Jim Flaherty did well this week. But Jim Flaherty’s mettle is still to be tested in the weeks ahead.

It is in all of our interest he keeps doing his job well.

(EDITOR’S NOTE: Conservatives should remain rested and not operate heavy machinery after reading this column.)

 



2 Responses to “Flaherty, plugged”

  1. Scott McFadyen says:

    Flaherty was a good man with a good soul. Our country was served well by him. The country is returning to surplus and we weathered the worldwide recession. He understood the importance of public service and sacrificed much in serving his country.

  2. Jim Flaherty was the right man at the right time … sometimes we get lucky that way … Canada was lucky to have him in 2008/9. Jim Flaherty, RIP.

Leave a Reply

*