Obama vs. Bush: it’s all here.

Comments (18)

Is this accurate? Jut saw it on Twitter. If so, he’s a goner:

Romney on CNN: “I’m not concerned about the very poor … We will hear from the Democrat Party the plight of the poor”

Comments (22)

As a Stupid Blogger© of some standing, I continue to be amused by the Left Coast’s ongoing campaign to elicit strong reactions from Bob “Not Interim” Rae.

Watch this.

Comments (10)

Son One is finding ways to stay up all night on Internet. Exhausted parents looking for way to jam wireless signals without having to unplug wireless/change passwords every night. Does a simple machine exist to jam signal during bedtime?

Comments (24)

We won! Finally! And against the team that hasn’t lost a game all season!

Son, the goalie, is under that pile-on.  Father, the proud one, took the picture to brag.

(It’s also a souvenir: everyone expects Rob Ford is going to lock out city workers this weekend – which means that hockey, at places like Leaside, is possibly over for the season.)

Rob Ford doesn’t care if my kids get to play hockey for the rest of this season.
We parents are going to make him care.

Comments (6)

Whenever they’re in political trouble, progressives — Liberals and New Democrats in Canada, Democrats in the United States — will say they’d win more if only they communicated better. If only they had a better “narrative,” they say, they’d beat conservatives more often.

So, a young senator from Illinois, Barack Obama, once called for a “new narrative” to wrest power back from conservative Republicans (he got one, and won). Robert Reich, one of Bill Clinton’s smarter guys, lamented that Republican conservatives win all the time because they “have mastered the art of political narrative.”

Up here, you hear a lot of the same sort of kvetching. Shortly after he got his keister kicked in the May 2011 federal election, for instance, Michael Ignatieff told my friend Michael Valpy that he lost because he didn’t “control the narrative.”  

His successor, Bob Rae, said in a big-vision speech at the Economic Club the “populist narrative” of Conservatives has been used to fool lots of folks into voting for Stephen Harper.  

And so on, and so on. These days, then, you hear otherwise smart progressives yammering on and on about “narratives” and “framing” and “branding” and stuff like that.  

Comments (56)

Read it to the end.  You won’t regret that you did.

Comments (33)

There’s been a plethora of polls, in the past few days, and they tell us interesting things.

For the Conservatives, they’re down a bit, but not enough to relinquish the gold medal spot they’ve had for many, many months. For those of you who say the Harpies have become a Seinfeld government—a government about nothing—you’re likely to get the polls quoted back to you.

Staying out of the papers, the Harper folks will say, works. Canadians don’t like drama, at least when it comes to governing. Do your thing and stay out of our lives. Harper seems to be heeding that admonition, for now.

In second place, the silver medal spot, goes to the New Democrats. How they’ve remained there is, truly, an Olympian feat. It’s a mystery. They’ve done and said nothing—precisely nothing—for month after month. But in second place, they remain.

Sure, they’ve slipped a bit in Quebec and elsewhere. Sure, the media are grumpy about their boring leadership race. But—as a Dipper will no doubt tell you—they’re not a passing fad. Jack Layton put them in second place, and in second place they remain.

My beloved Liberals, meanwhile, have been maddeningly mired in third place—ignominious bronze medal status—for months. In the last couple weeks of the May 2011 campaign, we slid to third party status, and we’re stuck there.

Given how spectacularly dull the NDP leadership contest has been—and given how do-nothing the Harper folks have been, in the face of continuing economic turmoil in Europe and the U.S.—I find that frustrating as hell.

The Liberals have done well. They completely overshadow the NDP in media coverage, and the mid-January Ottawa policy convention—attended by 3,200 delegates—was a huge, huge success.

But here we are, still, looking down at the bronze medallions dangling from our necks. How do we get back to the top rung, where we belong?

I have some ideas, but I’m not at all certain they’ll work. But one thing’s certain: if we end 2012 where we started, Bob Rae won’t be leading us for long.

Comments (18)

Capitalism, in its current form, has no place in the world around us.

Those words are not mine. They’re a quote, from a fellow named Klaus Schwab.

For the many who are unlikely to have heard of Klaus Schwab before, rest assured — he’s no socialist rabble-rouser.

He’s a billionaire, in fact, and the founder of something called the World Economic Forum, in Davos, Switzerland.
Prime Minister Stephen Harper was at Schwab’s Davos gathering last week, as were dozens of other world leaders and billionaires.

While Harper didn’t perform the last rites on capitalism, plenty of others weren’t so shy.

The capitalist “model” needs to be radically revised, said another billionaire, David Rubenstein, and if we don’t, “we’ve lost the game.” German Chancellor Angela Merkel, in the keynote Davos address, agreed: “We need to debate new methods,” she said.

As I told Krista Erickson on her Sun News Canada Live show, Davos 2012 was different from previous years. Among other things, it was interesting.

Comments (55)

Headed up to Joyride 150 with Son Three ’cause it’s wet and cold. Listening to him sing along to this slice of pop genius made me wish the ride would go on forever.

Comments (0)