Obama: the 99 per cent

He calls it the 98 per cent, but the message is the same: the rich should pay more.  Ironically, I spent part of this week interviewing Occupiers at the last Occupy encampment in Canada, in Harbourfront Park in St. John’s.  Their message, too, is all about the 99 per cent – that a minority control have a major share, while the majority are left with a minority of the wealth.

All of this is basically what my next book is about, and I hereby demand that the President give me royalties for stealing my ideas for the SOTU.  It’s why he’s going to win again, after all.


In today’s Sun: body of evidence

You’re going to think I’m crazy — or crazier than usual — but hear me out.

In politics, some folks base their advice on polls, focus groups and data. Me, I favour my gut. It generally doesn’t let me down.

For example: Back in the summer of 1990, when I was offered a job by then-opposition leader Jean Chretien, I had quite a few family and friends saying “don’t do it.” I was doing well as a lawyer, they said, and Chretien would never, ever be prime minister.

My head told me they might be right, but my gut said I should go work for the p’tit gars de Shawinigan. As things turned out, I never hesitate to tell my relations and friends, Chretien kind of did all right, didn’t he?

Which brings me, in a typically circuitous fashion, to a Toronto boardroom in the fall of 2008, a few weeks before Michael Ignatieff would become leader of the Liberal Party of Canada. Gathered in the Yorkville boardroom was Ignatieff’s charming wife, plus most of his senior advisers. I was the only one wearing a T-shirt (an Obama T-shirt, incidentally).