The mere fact of going to the Speaker and trying to influence him is pretty inappropriate and should be investigated.
The public should know what was actually said to the Speaker and the let the court of public opinion judge whether what was said, was in contempt of the Parliament.
Are you also going to ask that every time an opposition member goes to the Speaker the public get a transcript of the conversation so that they can decide whether or not there has been undue influence?
Are the opposition parties going to release all of their internal e mails, so the public can decide whether or not they are on the side of the angels?
As Mr. Shurman has proven, the opposition talks a good game, but fails to live up to the high standards they set for the government.
Is Jenni Byrne working P/T for them or something? Strike five.
I thought that was funny . Is there something wrong with my sense of humor.
The mere fact of going to the Speaker and trying to influence him is pretty inappropriate and should be investigated.
The public should know what was actually said to the Speaker and the let the court of public opinion judge whether what was said, was in contempt of the Parliament.
Are you also going to ask that every time an opposition member goes to the Speaker the public get a transcript of the conversation so that they can decide whether or not there has been undue influence?
Are the opposition parties going to release all of their internal e mails, so the public can decide whether or not they are on the side of the angels?
As Mr. Shurman has proven, the opposition talks a good game, but fails to live up to the high standards they set for the government.