07.27.2016 11:55 AM

Donald loves Vlad


22 Comments

  1. godot10 says:

    I believe Bill Clinton received $500K in speaking fees from Russia companies, and the Clinton Global Initiative received $150 million dollars from Russian companies, while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State, and who approved the takeover of a company with American uranium assets by Uranium One (controlled and significantly owned by Russians).

    #TheClintonGlobalInitiative loves #Vlad more.

    • Warren says:

      That’s fucking bullshit. Where’s the proof from reliable media.

      • godot10 says:

        http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/apr/26/peter-schweizer/fact-checking-clinton-cash-author-claim-about-bill/

        Bill Clinton speaking fees from Russia: Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State in 2010.
        2010 — Russia, $500,000, Renaissance Capital (Russian finance corporation);

        On the Uranium One and Clinton Global Initiative connections:
        http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

      • G. McRae says:

        Is the NY Times reliable? http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

        “As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

        And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.”

        • G. McRae says:

          Here is the money quote from the NY Times, pardon the pun…

          “the episode underscores the special ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation, headed by a former president who relied heavily on foreign cash to accumulate $250 million in assets even as his wife helped steer American foreign policy as secretary of state, presiding over decisions with the potential to benefit the foundation’s donors”

        • MississaugaPeter says:

          A Canadian Billionaire and the Clinton Foundation reported by company whose Billionaire owner endorsed Hillary.

          http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-05-07/the-billionaire-whose-clinton-foundation-ties-could-be-trouble-for-hillary-clinton

          What a buffoon Trump is for suggesting the Russians should uncover the other emails that were not part of the 30,000+ emails off Hillary’s private server that WikiLeaks.org did release on their website in March (and is still there). WikiLeaks has been beating their chests really, really hard trying to get the media to chase the donor angles of the DNC email leaks, and Trump should have been encouraging that. Instead, he falls right into the Democratic narrative. What a buffoon. The truth is that it was probably a Romanian hacker. I don’t think Assange would be saying it was not hacked by Russians if it really was. I suspect that egomaniac Assange may release more emails very soon if they donor angle does not get traction soon. The truth is it maybe is in Europe, but it definitely is not here. WikiLeaks is pushing Green Party. IMO, I think the purpose of the leaked DNC emails was to get Sanders to take over or be a part of the Green ticket.

    • Christian says:

      Whatever. As Warren says “thats fucking bullshit”. Here’s what your guy is doing. Imagine if a Democrat EVER did this.

      http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/27/politics/donald-trump-vladimir-putin-hack-hillary-clinton/index.html

      The Democrats were being ‘nice’ in my opinion. But I won’t be. Your guy is a treasonous piece of human garbage. Hope the Republicans like lying in that bed of shit they’ve been busy making for themselves all these years. Ronald Reagan, SORRY! SAINT Ronald Reagan, must be rolling in his grave.

      • godot10 says:

        Obama wiretapped Angela Merkel. How is that different than Putin hacking the DNC or perhaps Hillary’s home server.

        • Mark says:

          Nice Whataboutism. But sorry, the Americans did not wiretap and then release them publicly in an effort to manipulate the public and Gemany’s democratic process.

          All nations spy. But inviting foreign governments to spy on their fellow citizens not something an aspiring leader should do.

    • Ron says:

      This sounds a lot like another epistle from 55 Savushkina Street.

  2. Kelly says:

    I think a big challenge for the Democrats is that they are perceived to be extremely incompetent at foreign policy, so it weakens their justifiable – – necessary — criticism of Trump’s foreign policy ignorance. They made a mess of Iraq, Syria, Libya and they had involvement in the removal of a democratically elected President of Ukraine . . . as greasy and crooked as he was… simply because he was Russia’s guy. Putin is a former KGB man. What does one expect to happen if the US doesn’t respect Russia’s sphere of influence? Putin is basically U.S. foreign policy blowback going back to George Bush Sr.’s days. There are lots more leaks coming according to Wikikeaks. This is also Julian Assange’s revenge.

  3. James Smith says:

    Putin’s Pussycat, Conman Donny, has just engaged in what a former member of the Bush Administration’s NSC, William Inboden calls “tantamount to treason” http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/trump-russia-clinton-emails-treason-226303

    • Kelly says:

      Hacking into the personal email account of someone who happens to be secretary of state isn’t treasonous, because Hillary isn’t the US Government and we know she would never use her own computer and email account for official government business, correct?

      • dean sherratt says:

        It certainly isn’t treason if you are hacking for the Russian government. One may even argue that you are a (well paid) patriot.

      • James Smith says:

        No, read the article. Conman Don is urging a foreign government; Russia, to launch a cyber attack against the Democratic Nominee for President of the United States. With respect, a man who likely has more knowledge on the topic of Treasonable offences than anyone on this Comment Board is putting this opinion forward.

  4. J Robinson says:

    Hi Warren, I can’t figure out if Trump is saying every thought that pops into his head, and he has extreme ADHD, or if these things he says are calculated and planned. I mean it sounds crazy and stupid, but is it a gaffe? If he planned to say that line, was his intention to draw attention back to the email scandal, or what?

    From your experience as a war room chief, what do you think is going on in Trump’s war room? Do you think this was planned or a stupid gaffe?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*