05.08.2017 02:18 PM

Bits from today’s column about tomorrow’s vote (update twice!)

(And HuffPo version here!)

(Oh, and John Horgan seems to have, um, gotten stuck on the campaign trail…)

Twenty-one years ago, we BC Liberals were gathered at the Hotel Vancouver, peering up some big TV screens, shocked by what we were seeing.
It was Election Day in British Columbia, and the returns were coming in.  And they didn’t make any sense.  At all.

We were ahead, but we were behind, too.

The Gord Campbell-led Liberals had substantially more votes than our principal opponent, the BC New Democrats – some 40,000 votes, when they were all counted.  We owned the popular vote, right from the moment that the polls closed.  We’d end up with three percentage points more than the Dippers, in fact.

But we were still losing.

There was noise behind us: Christy Clark, Mark Marissen and some of their campaign team were swinging down the Hotel Vancouver stairs, cheering.  Christy had won a seat in the Legislature, and would soon become a star.  In a time, she’d become Premier, too.

But not tonight.  Tonight, the BC NDP – much like Donald Trump would do, two decades later – won with less votes.  Way less votes.  Just as the 2016 Electoral College had perverted the clear will of the American people, a bizarre BC electoral system had denied victory to the clear winner of the 1996 race.

And now, 21 years later, BC returns to the polls tomorrow.  And the race is just as tight as it was in 1996.

Clark, having been BC Liberal leader since 2011, is well-known quantity.  She is upbeat, she is unflappable, and she is one of the best political performers I’ve ever seen.  But in B.C., those who won’t vote for her – well, they were never going to vote for her.  The fact that she has overseen the strongest economy in Canada – the fact that she has the lowest unemployment rate in the country – is irrelevant to her hardcore opposition.  They dislike her.

The embodiment of their dislike is their (latest) champion, BC NDP leader John Horgan.  Horgan is a big, burly kind of guy – the kind of guy who shoots his mouth off at family gatherings, offering strong opinions when none is wanted.  He’s kind of like the uncle who won’t ever shut up.

Evidence of this came early in the campaign. At very the first leaders’ debate, Horgan – after talking over Clark repeatedly, like boorish, over-refreshed uncles do – Horgan leered at the Premier and actually said this: “I’ll watch you for a while. I know you like that.”

That creepy, condescending remark was a Kim Campbell Week One Level was a disaster. Horgan — sounding rather like Groper-in-Chief Donald Trump — would continue to hear about that one for many days.  The next morning, the National Post put his words in a headline on their front page.

“That regrettable moment in the B.C. leaders debate,” noted the Post, unamused.  Horgan was “angry,” lacked “respect,” and had the debate’s most “regrettable” moment, the newspaper reported.

It was also true.

The entire campaign kind of was like that.  Christy was upbeat and unflappable all over the hustings.  Horgan was a boor, and had more policy positions than the Kama Sutra.  And the BC Green Party’s leader, Andrew Weaver, generally impressed soft-NDP voters with his demeanor and his candour.

If the BC NDP loses – as some now predict they might, despite having been ahead by double-digits just a few weeks ago – it will be partly because Weaver’s Greens stole away voters who were unimpressed by the BC NDP leader’s total inability to control his temper, and himself.

Personally, as you may have gleaned, I very much want my BC Liberal friends to win.  They’ve run the better campaign.  Sure, they are a coalition party, made up of Liberals and Conservatives and former Socreds.  Sure, they’ve been in power for a long time – since 2001, when Gord Campbell reduced the NDP to just two seats.  Sure, Clark never seems to stop smiling – that has to be irritating to pious and preachy Dippers who want to discredit her.

But trust me on this: the BC NDP are the most venal, most corrupt political party I have ever come across – and that’s saying something.

In ’96, the Glen Clark-led New Democrats were the sleaziest, dirtiest, rotten-est opponents imaginable.  They’d threaten young Liberals with violence at our events.  They’d send in big union guys to dissemble our events minutes before announcements, citing non-existent bylaws.  They’d drop leaflets containing dirty, grimy attacks on our people.  I asked campaign boss Greg Lyle about the hate.  Said he: “These are the best jobs they’ve ever had.  They will say and do anything to keep them.”

As a few of us predicted to the media on election night 1996, the Clark NDP would reveal itself to be the most dishonest provincial government in modern Canadian history, too.  They stole from charities (Google “Bingogate”). They were linked to bribes (Google “Hydro-gate”).  And, of course, there was the deck that killed off an NDP Premier (Google “Glen Clark,” “deck” and “act of folly”).  The BC NDP treated the provincial treasury like it was their personal piggybank.  Their name was synonymous with scandal.

Can the BC NDP win tomorrow night?  Sure they can.  It’s a tight race.  The media has been gunning for Christy Clark.  Some British Columbians have forgotten – inexplicably, incredibly – that they live in the province that most other Canadians want to live in.

But – as they peer up at those big TV screens at the BC Liberal 2017 election night party – here’s hoping there isn’t a repeat of 1996.

You know: win more votes, but still lose.

 

 

 

 

 

7 Comments

  1. Luke says:

    I can appreciate all the points you make. But what of the uncritical look at Christie Clark and her Liberals? You mention some good things, but there is plenty to criticize. They’ll win anyway, likely for the reasons you’ve mentioned (boring and crappy NDP, better Greens) and the usual stuff (economic rhetoric and the like) and the favourable distribution of the Liberal vote.

  2. Miles Lunn says:

    What are your seat predictions. I agree with the number of close ridings it could go either way. The BC Liberals should hold if not gain seats in the Interior. Vancouver Island is a wildcard as I don’t think Greens will win many seats but they could play spoiler in many. As for Lower Mainland the NDP have a slight edge but there seems to be a city proper vs. suburbs divide and since the BC Liberals only hold four seats in the city proper (three which were won by double digits) that is somewhat a good thing. Most of the inner suburban ridings they either lost or won by big margins and when you get the outer suburbs where you have some competitive ones economy and jobs as opposed to affordability tends to do better. My prediction is as follows below.

    BC Liberals 45 seats (pick up Coquitlam-Burke Mountain, Delta South, and Skeena)
    BC NDP 40 seats (Pick up Vancouver-Fraserview, Burnaby North, Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows, Delta North, and Surrey Fleetwood)
    BC Greens 2 seats (Pick up Saanich North and the Islands).

    Popular vote
    BC Liberals 41%
    BC NDP 40%
    BC Greens 16%
    Others 3%

    That being said a lot of close ridings. North Vancouver-Lonsdale, Port Moody-Coquitlam, Maple Ridge-Mission, and Surrey-Guildford could easily flip to the NDP which would be enough to win while I can see them holding Vancouver-Fraserview and Burnaby North if there is a strong turnout amongst the Chinese community (who heavily favour the BC Liberals but typically have low turnout). Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows, Delta North, and Surrey-Fleetwood should be nail biters so a slight uptick in BC Liberal support could hold those ones. Coquitlam-Maillardville and Burnaby-Lougheed are ones the BC Liberals could pick up too. Columbia River-Revelstoke is a long shot but possible. For Greens Cowichan Valley is a possibility but cannot see where they will get their fourth seat. Saanich South, Saanich North & the Islands, Cowichan Valley, Nanaimo and North Island are ones where the Greens will play an important role so a better than expected Green showing could lead to some BC Liberal upsets in these while a weaker showing should ensure easy NDP holds.

  3. doconnor says:

    The “bizarre” BC electoral system is they same as everywhere else in Canada. The same thing happened in Quebec and the is it fair chance it will happen again in BC. It the same one many say is not worth changing.

    • Miles Lunn says:

      Actually we had a whole string of such results provincially although none in the last decade. There was BC in 1996, Saskatchewan in 1999 where the Saskatchewan Party won the popular vote but NDP won, Quebec in 1998 where the Quebec Liberals won the popular vote but lost to the PQ, and New Brunswick 2006 where the PCs won the popular vote but lost to the Liberals, which is the most recent case. Federally it’s happened too, the last time was in 1979 where the Liberals won the popular vote but the PC’s under Joe Clark won the most seats, but that didn’t last long. However federally no party has ever lost the popular vote and won a majority government, but there have been two minorities post WWII where this happened and both times (1957 and 1979) it was the Liberals who won the popular vote and PCs who won electorally.

  4. Charlie says:

    https://twitter.com/IanPatonDelta/status/861636539821862913

    This would be enough to win my vote if I were a Delta resident.

  5. Lawrence Barry says:

    Ahhhh WK…. – speaking of scandals – my personal favourite and one that doesn’t get the play it deserves – the “industrious” Jenny Kwan and the $30K junket to Wally World – ranks right up there with Mr. Stupich in my books! Then the time out to the “Quiet Room” to reflect on life afterwards!! Priceless.

Leave a Reply to Warren Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.