— Musings —09.21.2023 08:50 AM
Politics, 2023 style
The people who complained that Ottawa wouldn’t release details about China’s wrongdoing in Canada are the same people now complaining that Ottawa released details about India’s wrongdoing in Canada.
Go figure.
False equivalence. I would say that they are complaining that Justin hasn’t released details on India either.
Ottawa has released details?
I’d really appreciate knowing where one could find these details.
The Globe and Mail (published 3 hours before the time of my writing) said “no elaboration on the provenance of those credible allegations, and no explanation of that potential link”
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/editorials/article-ottawa-owes-canadians-the-full-truth-on-the-killing-of-hardeep-singh/
Who made the allegations?
Who decided they were credible?
What is the POTENTIAL link?
So far (to my knowledge) we just have Justin’s word.
Why would I believe Justin Trudeau?
Would Trudeau lie for political gain? Or to divert attention from his other problems?
Gotta disagree.
I’ve been paying attention and I have yet to see any details of this. Not only that, I find the current statement that “credible evidence” exists that India may be behind it, a bit questionable, due to the inclusion of the term “may”. I mean how credible can it be if it’s only “may have been involved”? Can you even have credible evidence of something that might be?
I want to see the evidence of Indian interference, just like I wanted to see evidence of Chinese evidence.
Better writers than me have demonstrated the night-and-day difference between how this government dealt with allegations of Chinese interference and allegations of Indian interference.
What details? Trudeau made very serious allegation but has yet to provide any evidence in support of those allegations.
Quite the double standard here.
The great actor campaigned on an admiration of China’s basic dictatorship. His daddy’s foundation is embroiled in a Trudeauesque scandal regarding funds linked to Chinese manipulation and a great Canadian public servant and family friend was thrown under the bus to preserve relations with China.
Buried in that latest scandal, falling in the polls, embarrassed on the world scene, he limps into parliament and tries to rally another political base.
A week ago I am reading that the clown prince ought to recuse himself and let someone else lead and today many people’s liberal DNA is activated I might say blindly falling in line as he finds an opportunity to wash his stinking image.
If there were some credibility under that smirk, the man would have boycotted India at the G20. Yes taken a stand and made a big fucking deal out of it. The big deal only came after he limped home embarrassed.
That is why I question the idiot, because he cannot be trusted to do anything because it is just, but just because it will help his image.