Section 13 is dead

Why is it a mistake? Why is it a disgrace?

1. The Cons had no election mandate to do what they did.

2. In fact, until they got a majority, they’d always defended the section.

3. It now means our only tool to fight online hate is the Criminal Code. Criminalizing all hateful speech is going way too far.

4. It means we are the one of the only Western democracies without a cheap, non-criminal means to combat online hate.

5. It leaves minorities without any meaningful recourse when facing hate. Will they take the law in their own hands?

They might, and it’d be hard to blame them. Canada has declared you are now free to say whatever hateful thing you want about someone’s race, ethnicity, orientation, disability or religion online.

Welcome to Stephen Harper’s Canada. It’s ugly and about to get uglier.


Blocked! Messrs. Wicary, Murray and McLeod are idiots, a continuing series

The Globe’s Stephen Wicary and the Post’s Steve Murray have blocked me on Twitter, presumably because I had the temerity to object to the fact that they were joking online about Jun Lin’s death.  (The Chronicle-Herald’s Paul McLeod, another MSM jerk who defended making light of Magnotta’s crime, hasn’t, yet, but the day is still young.)

I’ve returned the favour, and blocked them, too.  But they still read (and re-read) what I’ve had to say about them on this web site.  As such, I ask this trio of addled donkeys: Wicary’s employer has published extensively, already, about the Vancouver developments.  So, too, Murray’s.  Also McLeod’s.

So when are you fellows going to continue to make jokes about it?

We’re waiting.