We of the Hot Nasties (like all punks) were huge Monkees fans. In the Nasties, in fact, we covered Monkees tunes more than any other band’s.
Here’s our take on ‘Steppin’ Stone,’ from our self-made LP. (If you listen carefully, you can hear my circa-1980 voice break.)
My highly-scientific poll didn’t include “RoboCon” as a choice. Andrew Coyne told me that was the name, whether I liked it or not.
So, I used that for my Sunday Sun column…but my editors aren’t so sure. Jury’s still out on the Name the Scandal contest.
In the meantime, here’s a magazine sure to become a big hit:
What you have just heard is a criminal offence. More details here.
I don’t give a sweet damn what Con-friendly commentators think about this scandal, or their claims that it is going to die.
It isn’t, because it can’t. There are three phases to this thing.
What does it all mean? It means that, because the wheels of justice grind slowly, and because there will be multiple prosecutions, we are going to be reading and hearing about this thing well into 2015.
Which, last time I checked, is an election year.
Racknine Inc. is being asked to hand over any data, such as emails or billing records, linking it to the Conservative campaign in Guelph, Ont., where the robocall accusations originated. Residents said they received phone calls directing them to the wrong voting locations.”
Truly shocking – and unnecessary.
If senior people within the Conservative Party of Canada conspired to rig the May 2011 election – and, increasingly, it looks like they did – what are the consequences?
For Stephen Harper’s party, the penalties could be very, very significant. They range from fines and jail time, to deregistration of Harper’s party and liquidation of its assets.
A recap: as has been well-documented in the media, Conservatives used automated pre-recorded “robocalls” to contact voters in ridings across the country to provide them with false and misleading information about polling stations. Other voters were called late at night and, they say, harassed and intimidated.
No longer. A Liberal did this, and hurt his leader and his party.
So, are we now to believe that this Ontario-based staffer got those divorce pleadings all by himself? That he traveled to Manitoba and back to get them, without anyone’s help?
I don’t think so. But I do think everyone else involved in this dumpster-diving should be fired, too.
Around 80,000 words, written between now and the end of October.
Stephen Harper, are you listening?
I was reading a history of the Clash when the Vic Toews thing broke.
This may seem more than tangential, but bear with me. In about 1984, Joe Strummer and Paul Simonon kicked Mick Jones out of the Clash. No one’s quite sure why they did it, but they just did. Mick Jones, the guy who created the Clash, had been kicked out of his own band. It was a huge shock.
Here’s my stab at making a link: if you were a progressive person — a Liberal or New Democrat — watching your comrades swim through the muck of the Toews file was a bit like Mick Jones must have felt. People you had worked with for years, people you had admired, utterly took leave of their senses. They looked like jerks of the first order.
So, there were the Toews’-haters on Twitter, or on Facebook, or whatever else they consider to be “social media,” digging giddily through the muck. There they were on comments threads, excoriating Tim Harper or Dan Gardner for having the decency to demand that people act with decency. There they were, piously claiming that some new media revolution was underway, and they were leading it. There they were, saying over and over that “Toews deserves it.”
But you know,Toews’ kids, and Toews’ ex-wife, and Toews’ wife DIDN’T deserve it. Not at all.
What in the name of all that is holy did they have to do with a poorly-conceived, over-reaching, invasive piece of legislation? What did they do to deserve being dragged through the biggest wave of slime and muck Ottawa’s seen in ages (when Ottawa’s seen plenty of slime and muck)?
Here’s another little tale: I was at a campaign meeting with the Ontario Liberals last spring, and we were getting ready for the October 2011 election. And one of the smart and experienced McGuinty senior staffers there just said, out of the blue, what the difference was between us and the Conservatives. “We have boundaries,” she said. “They don’t.”
I don’t remember anything else from that meeting, but I remember that: we have boundaries. The Conservatives don’t.
Well, in the past few days, we boundary-observing types have fully become what we once claimed to despise. We have become just as bad as them.
So, when Steve Maher’s amazing robocall story broke, around the time the Toews thing started to subside, Lefties were in full dudgeon again. They were entitled to be angry. But the high ground, they no longer had. When the choice came, quite a few of them didn’t hesitate to toss Vic Toews’ wife and kids onto the funeral pyre, did they? No, they didn’t.
Like I say, it’s about boundaries. The Clash crossed one, and they never found their way back.
Liberals who dug through Vic Toews’ divorce files may find their way back. But it’s going to take a while to get the stink off them.
