I’m 7 friends away from the not-so-magic 5,000 friends limit.

When I get there, I have heard that the possibilities are:

1. I won’t be allowed to accept any more friends;
2. I get punted off of Facebook for being a machine, because it’s not possible that an actual human being can have that many friends; or
3. My head will explode.

If the head-exploding thing doesn’t happen, non-friends can continue to follow my exploits, such as they are, on my “fan” page, which is here.

God bless and keep Mark Zuckerberg.

Comments (10)

The best columnists, my friend and big brother Angelo Persichilli once advised me, “are never, ever predictable.”

By that standard, Kelly McParland is becoming one of the best columnists around.  See here and here, and that’s just this week.  Not something I’d expect in the Post, and therefore impressive.

(He’s not perfect, however. Let’s not get carried away.)

Comments (25)

Ford Official portrait.  Go to it, investigative reporters!

If a progressive administration did this to a conservative media outlet – the Post or Sun News or what have you – the media organization would (rightly) have grounds to be outraged.

The Star, I think, is being too meek in its response. If Toronto’s Chief Troglodyte wants to declare war on a paper, I’d return the favour, times ten. Get Kevin Donovan’s investigative team to go through every inch of both Ford’s lives. Make ’em cry like the babies they’ve revealed themselves to be.

There’s a lot there, for a reporter prepared to look.

A lot.

Comments (25)

Hope she has a staff to handle the CVs.

Comments (13)

Quote:

OTTAWA — The Conservatives have confirmed they are behind a rash of phone calls to Liberal MP Irwin Cotler’s Montreal-riding over the past couple of weeks in which constituents allegedly were told of Cotler’s resignation and a pending byelection.

But while the party says it was not breaking any rules, political scientists feel the tactic crosses a line and will harm not only voters’ trust in the system, but perhaps even the Conservatives themselves.

“It’s disgusting,” said Queen’s University professor Ned Franks. “Politics is a blood sport but that doesn’t mean you have to resort to dirty blows.”

The “political scientists” – who, in my experience, are neither – are wrong.  It’s much more than “crossing a line.” This is a corrupt practice and against the law.  In fact, if electors were provided with false information, inside or outside of the writ, laws were indeed broken.  That’s particularly true if any aspect of the Conservatives’ conspiracy took place in or near Ontario.

Quote:

96.2 (1)  A person who, inside or outside Ontario, prevents another person from voting or impedes or otherwise interferes with the person’s exercise of the vote is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable to a fine of not more than $5,000.

Party to offence

(2)  A person who, inside or outside Ontario, does anything for the purpose of aiding another person to commit the offence described in subsection (1), abets another person in committing it, or counsels or procures another person to commit it is a party to the offence.

Quebec has similar, and tougher, laws. This morning, the Harper Conservatives have admitted they’ve broken the law.  If I were Irwin Cotler – a man who I and others admire very much, and whose integrity is beyond reproach – I would get on the line to the police right now.

Comments (82)

…below. Very nice to receive.

Meanwhile, assorted media – at the Globe, Gazette, Huffington Post and elsewhere –  continue to falsely propagate the notion that there was a religious sanction for “honour killings.”  Not helpful.

**

Comments (22)

Earlier today:

Reporter: Tim, the Toronto District School Board wants you to apologize for things that were said during the campaign, including a homophobic, or what they’re saying is a homophobic flyer that was distributed by your party – will you apologize?
 
Hudak: You know, I’ve answered the question before, and the answer is no.

Comments (1)

Yesterday’s post stirred various Raelians – all using false names and/or fake email accounts, and regurgitating suspiciously-similar talking points – into a spit-flecked fury.  Some of the more rational ones argued that Bob Rae should be permitted to break his written promise not to seek the permanent leadership because, well, we’re doing great in one poll.

As a rejoinder, a regular reader sent me this.  It’s hard to read, but it makes clear that not all is well, one poll notwithstanding.  As he put it: “Warren, this is really why we’re losing elections. Sitting MPs with zero members. What a joke. They wonder where their volunteers are.”

Comments (31)

Below, one comment in response to today’s column.  I don’t know who is moderating over there, but they need to pay closer attention, I think.

• AlexRoberts642 Collapse

  Why is this anti-White still being given a platform for his blathering?

Comments (20)

I see.

So it’s okay for the interim leader to break his promise to not run for the leadership, and to squelch the ambitions of anyone other than himself?

Because, make no mistake, he promised not to seek the leadership post. And he said he would encourage, not discourage, others to seek the leadership.

He’s not telling the truth. And this is one “stupid blogger” who intends to make that point, over and over.

Comments (88)