, 05.23.2023 01:32 PM

My latest: David Johnston’s shame

David Johnston’s astonishing decision – to conclude that Canada does not need an inquiry into Chinese interference in our democracy – will be remembered for what it doesn’t do, not what it does.

Here are the five things it doesn’t do.

One, it won’t enhance David Johnston’s reputation. At all. Before Tuesday, the former Governor-General enjoyed a pretty stellar reputation. Honorary degrees, Order of Canada, decades of public service.

And then, on Tuesday, Johnston shredded all of that with a decision that validates everyone who questioned whether Johnston was the right person for the job – because of conflicts of interest, because of his position with the Trudeau Foundation, because of his long friendship with the very Liberal leader whose conduct needs to be examined. Johnston will now forever be known not for the good things he did in his life – but for this appalling, shocking decision at the end of it.

Two: Johnston’s abdication of responsibility won’t stop the torrent of leaks about China’s willingness to maul our democratic institutions. In fact, it’ll do the reverse: it’ll lead to even more leaks.

The CSIS agents – and others – who have been providing the media with details about the Chinese regime’s crimes haven’t been doing so for their health. They’ve been doing so at great risk – to their careers and to their liberty. And they’ve obviously done so to prod the Canadian government into taking action to counter the Chinese threat.

Johnston’s ghastly report will give the Trudeau Liberals the pretext they wanted to continue to cover up this scandal. But it won’t stop the bleeding. The leaks will continue to happen, and they will get worse. Johnston will have made things immeasurably worse for the government he clearly set out to protect.

Three, it won’t improve public opinion. It’ll make Canadians angrier, and more willing to lash out at the Trudeau regime.

Months ago, polls showed self-identifying Liberals wanted the same thing Conservative partisans did: a public inquiry. China’s belligerence and thuggery had done something that very rarely happens: united the public.

In these divided and disputations times, it is harder and harder to find consensus on any public policy issue. China’s interference in our democracy is the exception. David Johnson had an opportunity to take advantage of that unprecedented degree of consensus. And he blew it.

Four, Johnston’s terrible, horrible decision will not deter the news media from pursuing the story. That is particularly the case now that Johnson has adopted the Justin Trudeau and Donald Trump approach, and labeled those of us in the media as purveyors of “false news.”

That tactic did not work for Justin Trudeau in the SNC Lavalin or WE charity scandals, and it has not worked for Donald Trump – ever. Calling the media liars, as David Johnston effectively has done, will simply force the media to work even harder to prove that he is wrong.

Fifth and finally: Johnston’s decision will not satisfy our allies, who have become increasingly unhappy with the way Canada is dealing with a real and manifest threat to Western interests. And, most of all, it will not make the story go away. It just won’t.

An unhappy intelligence establishment. An unhappy voting public. An unhappy media. All will combine to ensure that this story continues to fill the front pages of newspapers, until someone in power does the right thing.

Whatever the opposition parties do now – and one of those things must be shutting down Parliament until an inquiry happens – is almost secondary. This issue is not going away. It is not disappearing.

But David Johnston should.

For good.

98 Comments

  1. Martin Dixon says:

    Justin just now-“we favourably accept this report”. Well, no kidding.

  2. Peter Williams says:

    Now will Justin prorogue Parliament until say September?

    This might take the heat off Jagmeet, and stops all those nasty Parliamentary committees from investigating further.

  3. whyshouldIsellyourwheat says:

    Equivalent to Colin Powell at the UN on WMD in Iraq.

    • Sean says:

      whoa… whoa… whoa… whoa… No fan of Justin or Johnston here – obviously.

      BUT – Colin Powell’s performance at the UN was on the edge of a war crime. Some scholars might view that performance as crossing the war crime boundary. Hundreds of thousands dead as a result. Serious stuff.

      David Johnston in 2023 is a performance in epic stupidity, no doubt about it. Possibly without parallel in Canadian politics…. but lets keep some perspective.

    • Martin Dixon says:

      Way worse. This whole situation just proves why our system can be very dangerous since it gives the PM the power of a dictator.

  4. Douglas W says:

    PMJT: I will do whatever I want to do. And I will use people, then dispose of them.

    PMJT continues to shrug and smirk.
    Great harm to the soul of this country.

    • Sean says:

      You’re giving him too much credit… More like: “sigh…is it Saturday morning yet? No? Maybe I’ll invent a fake National Holiday and go surfing.”

  5. Derek Pearce says:

    Surely even he can see that a public inquiry with massively redacted documents is still better than no inquiry at all? I’m just dumbfounded by this. I can’t imagine what is SO sensitive, SO shocking, what cover could be SO blown, that an inquiry would upset the entire security applecart.

  6. Sean says:

    There should be a new wing of portraits commissioned in the Canadian History Museum… paying tribute to the pantheon of distinguished / eminent Canadians whose reputations have been annihilated by their proximity to the 8 year long Justin Disaster. Maybe David Johnston will be the centerpiece. Perhaps a separate branch of the Order of Canada? The Legion of Disgrace?

    • Martin Dixon says:

      Former serious person, Frank Iacobucci, comes out of this looking like a dumbass too. When he saw the pics that have been floating around in the article below, he should have said, “Hey bud, I don’t even hug my family like that, you better take a pass. No one will believe you are not a friend when they see these. It doesn’t matter whether you were or weren’t.”

      Frankie gave him a technical law dude pass. You would think after what seemed to a be a distinguished career, he would have learned a thing or three about the meaning of the appearance of a conflict and passed that advice on to his naive and silly friend.

      But I am going with the fact that I just don’t believe Johnston. Either that or his wife is just another silly groupie. Possible I suppose, but that doesn’t explain the other pic where it looks like they should get a room.

      https://windsorstar.com/opinion/david-johnstons-not-tremendously-surprising-decision-to-minimize-foreign-interference

      • Sean says:

        Iacobucci and Johnston are the Statler and Waldorf of Canadian politics. Perched in their private booth… unencumbered by serious scrutiny…. they are high above ordinary Canadians… laughing and laughing at us all night long as they slap each other’s backs between cigars and brandy.

        This isn’t Liberalism. This is nowhere near the periphery of Liberalism. This is hardcore bullshit at it’s worst… un Canadian… un democratic… worthy of shame and disgrace…

        Cast your ballot accordingly.

  7. Martin Dixon says:

    Rosie and the mother corp are going to attempt to rehabilitate Johnston on The National tonight. I think I will pass. I saw a couple of snippets and it is clear she has not read O’Toole’s article. She is not a serious journalist.

    • Martin Dixon says:

      They now have it on permanent loop. I know the usual suspects believe that calling for the CBC to be defunded is just not done in polite company. But you are all the same people that were 100% certain that Johnston would call for an enquiry. People need to wake the fuck up as to what is going on here.

      • Martin,

        Sure, we’re the same people but defunding CBC loses us at least three times the number of potential votes than it gains us. Not rocket science. Plus it only confirms the Trudeau Liberal narrative that apparently we’re a bunch of right-wing wackos and kooks. Crackpots, if you will. Hello…

  8. - says:

    Warren,

    How could he?

    U-N-A-C-C-E-P-T-A-BL-E !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  9. Warren,

    How could he?

    U-N-A-C-C-E-P-T-A-B-L-E !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    (Better.)

  10. western view says:

    It is interesting that (to my knowledge) Johnstone never implied that any of the leaks were made up yarns, but only one dimension of intelligence gathering that gets merged with other reports for a multidimensional analysis. From that standpoint, the media has been exonerated for its decisions to go to print and air with solid information.

    Johnstone hints at breakdowns in the collecting and forwarding of sensitive information, often failing to reach politicians who should be aware of these issues. And yet this poor channeling of intelligence is not the fault of the government. Hmmm? I thought that the buck stops at the political level. Perhaps that’s the impetus for the leaks? The political actors are happy with a see no evil environment that gives lots of plausible deniability cover.

  11. western view says:

    The Liberals are likely doing the happy dance, smug in their cleverness. But they get to wear the fallout, regardless of what Johnstone recommended. The dirty little secret of Chinese meddling is out in the open and they can’t deny it.

    • Sean says:

      No. They are doing the brush off CVs / retirement dance these days. It will be a sad, meandering campaign loaded up with nostalgia and false narratives about abortion.
      Everyone knows what way the wind is blowing.

  12. Peter Williams says:

    I disagreed with a few of JWR’s policy positions, but I respected her while she was a minister.
    Then I came to admire her integrity. Too bad there are not more Liberals like her.

    Here is her tweet today
    https://twitter.com/Puglaas/status/1661074756148273152

    • Sean says:

      Liberals should have dropped PMJT during Lavscam and made JWR Leader in the ensuing Leadership Convention. They missed that golden opportunity to make things right. LPC has become a full on filthy engine of corruption since that moment.

      • Gloriosus et Liber says:

        I thought that after the Cash-for-Access dinners with Chinese billionaires came to light. That whole slimey enterprise alone was enough for him to be turfed.

  13. Sean says:

    Am I the only one who can’t wait to see the Sun’s headline tomorrow?!

  14. Phil in London says:

    David Johnson’s Shame or David Johnston’s Sham?

    When someone is so willing to toss aside a reputation it makes me think the reputation itself was a sham.

  15. Gloriosus et Liber says:

    Is it me or did Johnson just pull a Rudy Giuliani and torch his reputation on Trudeau’s bonfire?

  16. Sean says:

    In the next question period:

    Justin will apologize to the Chinese Government for on behalf of CSIS.

    Justin will apologize to David Johnston for the existence of the Toronto Sun.

    Justin will apologize to Han Dong for portraying his own cult leader status as though it were similar or equal to being the leader of a modern political party.

  17. richard hofer says:

    What oft was thought but n’ere so well expressed.
    Bravo
    Richard Hofer

  18. Sean says:

    If this doesn’t lead to an election… It begs the question… Why the f$%k do we even have elections in Canada?!

    Jagmeet will soon have his Jack Layton 2005 moment. It’s coming. We can all smell it.

    As a loyal Liberal, I’ve done my able best to talk a few good Liberals out of running for the nomination in my riding… hopefully, they will stand by as the local Justin cult follower is appropriately crucified at the ballot box.

  19. Gilbert says:

    Were there any circumstances under which Mr. Johnston would have determined Canada needed a public inquiry? I suspect he needed very little time to reach his decision.

  20. Pedant says:

    So can we all acknowledge now that Pierre Poilievre was 100% right to treat this appointment for the farce that it was from the beginning? He foresaw exactly what was going to happen and acted accordingly.

    • Martin Dixon says:

      The usual suspects are still going after his reaction though. It is very difficult to act Prime Ministerial 100 per cent of the time when you are watching the behaviour of what can only be described as a banana republic. Shock and outrage is a perfectly normal reaction unless you are part of the cult or the Laurentian elite.

    • Curious V says:

      Because you didn’t get the result you had hoped for? Why doesn’t Pierre get a clearance so he can come to the same conclusion? Because he doesn’t care – it’s never had anything to do with legitimate concern, it’s always been about a partisan attack.

    • Pedant,

      In a word: Yup. Hope Pierre maintains that kind of a track record. If he does, it’s majority time.

  21. Warren,

    For the CPC this means that every member and supporter will have to give 110% percent between now and the election. That smug little bastard and his fawning sycophants must be defeated. Period. Nothing on this Earth is more important in a Canadian context.

  22. Wink Dinkerson says:

    Meh, election day Quebec and Toronto vote another Trudeau minority government back into power with NDP support for another 4 years.

  23. Peter Williams says:

    Jagmeet Singh chirps, “Nothing short of an independent public inquiry on foreign interference is good enough.”

    But in practice, Jagmeet is going to accept Johnston’s report.

    Singh chirps, “We’ll being taking these concerns directly to the PM”. And Trudeau will just smirk at Jagmeet.

    Singh chirps, “We’ll use all our tools in Parliament to get answers for Canadians.” Mr. Singh, the record in Parliament shows you’ll get no answers from team Trudeau. Your record in committees? The NDP sides with the Liberals and shuts down questioning.

    Jagmeet Singh is like Trudeau… all talk, no substance.

    • Peter,

      Where’s Singh’s statement about definitely sinking those asshats if there’s no inquiry? Nowhere, that’s where.

    • Robert White says:

      Singh is not a groper and he doesn’t dress up in blackface. Nor does he victimize women in his party.

      I still support the NDP & Singh.

      The Cons still push BTC, too.

      Looks like another Liberal win to moi.

  24. TreeLimb says:

    Where’s Curious-V ?

  25. Curious V says:

    I think Johnson is a dignified guy who came to an honest conclusion. Simple as that. Maybe it’s not what some had hoped for, but he’s always been above partisan bickering, so he just came to an honest conclusion.

  26. Farooq says:

    And in the meantime, almost 3 out of 4 people I live and work with in the GTA, will never ever in a million years vote Conservative because they wake up in the morning, look in the mirror and see a progressive, tolerant, kind-hearted person (this is their self-perception I’m describing). The Conservatives are mean-spirited, backwards-looking and intolerant… or so the MSM tells us. As Andrew Breitbart wrote – politics is downstream of culture. And our dominant culture is metropolitan, risk-averse, leftism. Trudeau will skate on this issue and get another minority in two years’ time. It’s practically guaranteed. He knew this when he appointed Johnston; just make gestures but don’t do anything substantive. His base is into symbolisms that cements in their self-perceptions.

    As a country, we’re done.

    • Robert White says:

      You forgot to characterize the Cons [Ronald excluded] as the ‘hairy knuckle-dragging Neanderthals’ they really are
      in real life, eh.

      They are significantly lower in intelligence testing, too.

      🙂

    • Derek Pearce says:

      Heyy dude look at Danielle Smith. She’s an example of Canadian Conservatism and is bat-shit crazy and surrounds herself with batshit crazy people. Look at Leslyn Lewis. This isnt just about Poilievre’s off-putting personality (though it is partly that). The Conservatives are not-entirely but still quite a bit responsible for why so many Canadians still stick with the vanity and corruption of the Liberals.

      • Pedant says:

        Erin O’Toole ran the most left-wing platform in Conservative Party history and it wasn’t enough. The usual suspects called him pro-Polytecnique massacre because of some obscure gun policy. Trying to win over fake-centrists (actually status quoists) is a losing strategy.

        The reality is that the Liberal Party has infantilized the 40% of working age adults who are net non-taxpayers. They are addicted to perpetual theft from the few taxpayers left who are busily eyeing the emigration doors.

        Poilievre’s personality is offputting….to YOU. Liberals do not speak for everyone.

        • Pedant,

          Sorry, O’Toole lost because he was one person on Monday and another on Sunday. No one knew who the real Erin O’Toole was: the True Blue leadership winner, or the centrist conservative he mostly was in the campaign. But then he just couldn’t resist and blew himself out of the water, destroying his polling lead with whacko positions on assault-style weapons and anti-vaxxers/truckers. Canadians made it perfectly clear: that bullshit doesn’t sell with them and if Poilièvre goes down the same road on those same issues, HE’LL lose as well.

          Pierre thinks he knows better than the rest of us on these issues. He’s dead wrong so if he sticks to the same tune, he’s the next Erin O’Toole.

          • Pedant says:

            Not sure what you’re talking about Ron. First of all, the freedom patriot protest occurred in 2022, well after the 2021 election. Secondly, are you still conflating anti-mandate with anti-vaxx? Haven’t we moved on from that false talking point? The basic principle of “my body my choice” should not be left to the tyranny of the majority.

            A Liberal clone – another status quo-ist to serve the interests of wealthy Boomers – will not win the Conservatives the election. The Liberals already own that demogaphic.

  27. Peter Williams says:

    The Liberals don’t want a public inquiry, because they’d be called to testify under oath. And if they lie (or when?) they’re likely to be caught and face serious consequences, instead of $100 ethics violation fines.

    Johnston is going to hold public hearings (at $1500/day plus expenses). Liberal ministers and government staff could be invited to testify, but if I’m not mistaken, they can refuse. And I don’t know if there are any consequences for lying at a hearing.

  28. Warren,

    Sponsorship was one hell of a tipping point. This has the same potential. As Sean said, this is absolutely corruption (and nepotism) at large.

  29. EsterHazyWasALoser says:

    It is instructive to note how deeply the TruAnon cult has entrenched itself into the (so-called) progressive wing of Canadian politics. They are all atwitter with Mr Johnson’s finding. A few things come to mind here, such as “Justice must not only be done, it must be seen to be done”. The PM I am sure is ecstatic as it allows him to appear to be doing something, while in fact he doesn’t have to do anything. Anyone who has the temerity to suggest our national integrity has been violated will be called a racist, intolerant and disrespectful to Mr Johnson. I don’t doubt Mr Johnson is decent guy, but I am sure the insinuation he received with respect to this matter was to tell the great unwashed they are too dumb to be trusted with the details. They need to remember their place and not bother their betters.

    • Curious V says:

      It’s not that they are too dumb, it’s that the material reviewed is confidential – so it is more likely to benefit the conservatives than the liberals. That the material is confidential allows the conservatives to insinuate whatever they want, to the benefit of the conspiracy theorists making accusations. Having the intelligence confidential doesn’t really benefit the liberals, it benefits the conservatives, in that they can say whatever they want, make all kinds of accusations, and the material that contradicts them, reality, it’s all secret.

  30. Warren,

    To conclude on this thread, I will presume to speak for most Canadians, or at least a plurality of voters: they can all go royally fuck themselves. Bring on the damned election, ASAP.

  31. Gilbert says:

    I’ve never voted for the NDP and probably never will, but I like Tom Mulcair’s analysis regarding foreign interference in our elections and Mr. Johnston’s decision not to have a public inquiry. The former NDP leader tells the truth, and he makes it clear he believes the Liberals have something to hide. Only blind supporters of JT can’t see it.

    • Gilbert,

      They see it. They just don’t give a damn. In their minds, this government isn’t responsible to anyone, especially the voters. It’s our job to make them responsible to the voters and Pierre has that down pat. Thank God.

  32. Martin Dixon says:

    If anyone is keeping track, here are latest additions to the list of former serious people that have become former thanks to their relationship with Justin and the current ridiculous version of the Liberal party.

    Frank Iacobucci
    David Johnston
    Sheila Block

    Pretty impressive, actually.

    Add them to Domenic Barton, Michael Wernick and Bill Morneau. That was just off the top of my head. I am sure there are many more.

  33. Martin Dixon says:

    PROC is going to discuss the “report” today at 2pm and whether or not they should ask Johnston to speak to them. It will give people a primer on the difference between a hearing and an enquiry. The Liberals do not have a majority but I believe they can filibuster and can put a stop to it. Johnston can also refuse to come and, if he does, I don’t believe he will be under oath which is clearly problematic. We would have none of these issues with an enquiry.

  34. Scot says:

    Ha ha. Dumb ass Trudeau haters can cry me a river. Fucking morons.

    • Scot,

      Where have you been? This isn’t over, not by a longshot. We lost a preliminary skirmish. We WON’T lose the war otherwise known as the election. Your guy is already scared shitless to go to an election, just like Harper was twice. He bloody well should be.

    • The Doctor says:

      I think they call this “negative partisanship”.

    • Martin Dixon says:

      I will ask you the same question I asked Curious since he won’t answer it. Was Johnston lying in his 2016 interview when he said he was a BFF with Trudeau or was he lying when he presented his report and said he wasn’t. Inquiring minds would like to know.

    • Sean says:

      Hey Scott, welcome back!

      Which one of these hard hitting, well researched news headlines… would you say… is most likely to be fake news? Can you pick one out?

      Zendaya has a message for her fans!
      Harry had a wild year!
      Taylor learned about getting “cancelled”!
      Olivia deals with social media pressure!
      Paul paused making music!
      Sabrina has breakup confessions!
      Shawn took time away from the spotlight!
      Ariana Changed her life!
      Mary-Kate will never be happy!
      Selena thought she wasn’t pretty enough!
      Justin is a leader!

  35. Douglas W says:

    PMJT wins, but loses.
    No public inquiry but … signs that his support continues to soften across the land.

    His MPs won’t turn on him because they have no collective spine.
    But the party establishment might.
    And if the business community has had enough, then they’ll start to apply behind-the-scenes pressure that will force an exit strategy.
    We can only hope.

    • Douglas,

      That guy is going to get the Liberal Ignatieff treatment by his own party members and supporters. It’s coming. They will vote with their rear ends firmly secured on the sofa/couch.

      • Sean says:

        I don’t follow why Justin deserves treatment as nice as that received by Ignatieff. He was a bad leader for sure, but Ignatieff had some dignity, some class and had some genuinely serious accomplishments. For that , Ignatieff was allowed to leave on his own two feet after challenging a hopeless election. Justin doesn’t deserve that. Justin should never have been allowed to face a single election representing the Liberal Party.

        • Sean,

          Michael was a good leader but he had a difficult academic paper trail which definitely did not cut the mustard with the Liberal left, which is two-thirds of the party. Who can forget Ignatieff’s position on torture, especially given the fact that most studies have shown that torture is not particularly effective in obtaining information from the detained.

    • Gloriosus et Liber says:

      The business community won’t turn on the Liberals over this. They are the ones demanding “more” China because of the imaginary “1 billion customers”.

  36. Martin Dixon says:

    So I just watched the entire PROC committee from yesterday. Will never get that time back. The NDP are clearly in the tank for Justin. Someone mentioned that it is all about getting to 2025 so they can lock in their pensions. That is clearly the case. They spent about an hour discussing whether Dave should be asked to meet for two hours or three. Tories wanted him to show up earlier and the coalition shut that down. Turnbull was spending a lot of time making sure Dave was referred to as The Right Honourable. Oh, and there was discussion about the fact that Dave’s signature was on someone’s degree from Waterloo. It prompted me to look at mine. I am sure Burt Matthews was a fine fellow but I am not sure that his signature on my degree is relevant to anything.

    And an addition to a post above, when I said that Frankie was no longer a serious person, I didn’t even know he was at the same firm as Sheila Block. From Brian Lilley’s article:

    “Don’t worry though, because to ensure that Johnston had no conflict of interest, he asked retired Supreme Court Justice Frank Iacobucci to consider whether there was a conflict. Iacobucci is Senior Counsel at Torys, the same law firm as Block, and he also has a past connection to the Trudeau Foundation just like Johnston.”

    https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/trudeau-connected-to-all-investigating-chinas-interference

    Where did all these people go to law school?

    • Martin,

      How many lawyers do I know who recognize that the law is the law that is, until it suddenly potentially negatively affects their own prospects, positions or interests? What a profession.

  37. Beth Higginson says:

    I totally disagree with Warren Kinsella on this and Mr Angry – Pierre Polievre

    • Martin Dixon says:

      You clearly haven’t been looking at the interweb. Our host was kind to him. The most charitable thing that can be said about Dave is that he is a liar. I can provide a few links if that would be helpful. And what does PP have to do with the topic at hand?

  38. Gilbert says:

    If an election were held now, how many seats would the Liberals get?

  39. Peter Williams says:

    Justin Trudeau takes Chinese interference seriously. In fact, it appears that he’s counting on it.

    Remember, Justin admires China’s’ “basic dictatorship”

  40. Warren,

    Got to call bullshit this morning: the idea that Stephen Harper and Pierre Poilièvre could enthusiastically endorse Danielle Smith in the Alberta election is way beyond ridiculous. Both of them know perfectly well that Smith is unfit to properly manage a government and that her ideas are way beyond wacko.

    Everyone already knows that Smith makes the other pathetic leader, Justin Trudeau, actually look qualified to hold office. Trudeau proved in due course how the emperor had no clothes. For Smith, that proof is up front, from all the way back to when she sought the leadership. Fucking hypocritical, totally ridiculous. If Harper and Poilièvre wanted to be true conservatives, they would have endorsed no one in this race, given Smith’s totally inept political nature but No, let’s write her a blank cheque anyway. And people wonder why the dumbing down of quality candidates continues both in the United States and Canada…Stephen and Pierre: look in the mirror to find out why this keeps happening, this time, thanks to your endorsements.

  41. Gilbert says:

    Danielle will win. Albertans remember the NDP years.

    • Curious V says:

      Albertan’s are brainwashed. Inundated with fringe propaganda – it’s embarrassing, but you’re right, Danielle will probably win.

      • Curious V,

        And Ontarians aren’t? Absolutely no difference there. Come on. At least in Quebec we’re at least a genuine two-party show between HimselfTM and the Bloc.

  42. Curious V says:

    Hey Ronald,

    Read Nenshi’s article – you’re right that an endorsement of smith forces them into the wacko corner.

    https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/naheed-nenshi-if-you-re-hyper-partisan-you-may-not-want-to-read-this-column-1.6413376

    • Curious V,

      Yup, it is what it is. Pierre is running out of ramp and runway to make serious judgment errors. It’s easy for Harper, given that he’s even way past the twilight of his political career so no personal risk for him. It can only affect how historians ultimately view Harper. But Pierre is another kettle of fish entirely. Everyone sees that already. Well, almost everyone.

Leave a Reply to Sean Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.