Glen McGregor, revisionist

Glen McGregor, he of the “Deflower Caroline Mulroney Contest,” is very, very angry about my column below.  This upsets me a great deal, as you can well imagine.

He’s called my bosses at the Sun to demand a correction for writing, as I did, that he asked Michelle Rempel (now a Minister) about hair products in a scrum.  Seriously.

What do you think?  Did Glen ask Michelle about hair products?  Call me crazy, and many do, but it kinda seems like it.

Then again, he was running for cover when he joked about the contest to rape Ms. Mulroney, too.  Perhaps he can get a member of his family to demand an apology from me and Michelle, while he’s at it.


In Tuesday’s Sun: in defence of Laura Miller (and not a few other women)

It was a little thing, apparently. A tweet, a bit of digital detritus, something that comes and goes, with little or no attention paid. Happens all the time.

What made it significant was not its casual sexism, or even that the tweet’s author (a high-profile columnist) or its target (a former deputy chief of staff to former Ontario premier Dalton McGuinty) are both female.

No, what made it most noteworthy was that, after the sexist tweet was tweeted, no one really said anything. No one really objected. Not even the government of the current Ontario premier, herself female.

The occasion was the appearance of senior Ontario Liberal Laura Miller before a political circus masquerading as a legislative committee. As Miller testified about the decision to cancel gas plants — an issue considered moot by voters in McGuinty’s Ottawa South constituency, where they recently enthusiastically elected a former McGuinty aide to replace him in the provincial legislature — the columnist tweeted: “[Miller] looks and talks like a Valley Girl. This woman was the second most powerful person in the Premier’s office? Sad statement.”

What was “sad” was that the columnist — who I won’t name, and who (like all of us) shouldn’t be offering anyone tips about their personal appearance or diction — didn’t think the tweet was a problem. Nor, apparently, did any of the small army of communications specialists within Kathleen Wynne’s government. They didn’t object at all. Not a peep.

Perhaps it was because they did not want to get on the wrong side of the arch-conservative columnist (unlikely). Perhaps they didn’t notice the tweet (unlikelier). Perhaps there is a growing divide between McGuinty-era Liberals, and the freshly minted Wynne ones (likeliest).

Whatever the reason, one thing was axiomatic: What was noteworthy wasn’t the rank sexism. In politics, women get hit with that all the time, pretty much. What was significant, instead, is that even progressive political voices remained mostly silent.

In a scrum, with a straight face, Ottawa Citizen reporter Glen McGregor asks Conservative MP Michelle Rempel what hair products she uses. No one objects. Before her re-election, B.C. Premier Christy Clark gets called a “MILF” by a radio host — that is, a “Mom I’d Like to (Expletive)” — and the ostensibly progressive B.C. NDP say nothing.

Ontario NDP Leader Andrea Horwath gets called “a whore” by a radio commentator, and the other political panellists on the show — labour leader Buzz Hargrove and business leader Catherine Swift — say nada.

The sexism is bad enough; The indifference of people who should know better makes it measurably worse.

It doesn’t always happen that way. Many years ago, I posted a picture of an Ontario Conservative MPP on my website, and suggested she would rather be “baking cookies” than standing on a stage with a far-right political candidate. I was roundly condemned for my stupidity, and many times, too. I deserved every bit of it, and more.

There are other infamous examples. Former Liberal cabinet minister Belinda Stronach gets called, variously, a dog, a whore, a bitch and a prostitute — and her critics (all Conservative politicians) are widely condemned. John Crosbie dismisses Sheila Copps as a baby, and ends up boosting her reputation, and diminishing his own.

Too often, however, these things pass without comment. Sexism directed at female politicos receives a collective shrug. It’s almost worse than the sexist remark that preceded it.

Oh, and Laura Miller? She’s no dummy. And she deserved a lot better than she got — not just from the columnist, but from erstwhile friends, too.


Conservative commentator calls for Muslims to be killed

Wendy Sullivan is a Canadian white supremacist who uses the handles “Girl on the Right” or “Right Girl.” She broadcasts on something called “Brass Balls Radio,” as well.

Here is a tweet she posted yesterday. There are many more like it on her Twitter feed.

That, to me, meets the legal definition of advocating genocide (s. 318, Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1985) and/or incites/wilfully promotes hatred (s. 319, Code). I don’t have much doubt that.

What I don’t have, however, is her whereabouts. In order to alert the police, we need to know that Sullivan is in Canada, and where she lives.

Any help with that would be gratefully appreciated.

Oh, and Twitter’s recent grandiose claims about limiting/preventing such garbage? Was itself garbage, apparently.


Toronto needs a mayor: Rob Ford tried to meet secretly with drug dealer in jail

Quote:

“At around 7 p.m. on March 25, about three hours after official visiting hours, Mr. Ford arrived unannounced at the Toronto West Detention Centre and asked if he could have a tour of the jail, four sources with knowledge of aspects of the incident said. After the tour request was declined, the mayor indicated he wanted to meet with Mr. Bellissimo…

That request was also declined and the mayor departed – leaving an unsolved mystery within the correctional service about why the mayor visited at such an odd hour, why he was indirect about the purpose of his visit and why he needed to speak with Mr. Bellissimo, a 43-year-old who has had run-ins with police and has what numerous sources describe as a history of drug-related activity.”

Wow. Well, at least he wasn’t staggering around Toronto streets on the weekend, wasted. That would suggest he really does have a substance abuse problem.


I grow old

Tomorrow, I get even older. So, I sit on the dock and I’m here with new GBV (Tobin Sprout is back!) and a quart of Beau’s Lug Tread, and the sun is heading West, and everything is okay. The little guy is up at the cabin, reading.

The death of Blue Rodeo’s keyboard guy has been replaying in my head, over and over. He was the same age as me – and he’s gone, just like that. I didn’t even know him, and I miss him.

Gets you thinking. I’m maybe not as young as I was. What if that happens to me? What if there’s something wrong inside me, and I don’t even know about it?

Well, there’s not much you can do. I’m happy for the first time in years, and I’m on the dock with a quart and GBV. The sunset looks like it was painted by God. (It was.)

I miss my Dad and so many others, too, but I’m going to wring out as much living as I can out of whatever is left.

Happy birthday to me. Take care, wherever all of you all are.

I am totally crying, right now, and I do not have a fucking clue why.

20130810-184325.jpg


The Festival of Joy week in pictures

On the dock with Son Two, hours after his return from camp. Get Daughter on Sunday.

Been quite a week. So here it is in pictures.

Monday: me and Lala at Santa Monica Pier:

20130809-181604.jpg

Tuesday: onstage with the Palma Violets. That’s Chilli, there. Pic by the amazing Debi Del Grande, best photog in LA.

20130809-181933.jpg

Wednesday: back to TeeDot with my prized purchase: new Converse with the SFH logo!

20130809-182341.jpg

Thursday: the thing that made me happiest – arrests (finally) in Rehtaeh’s case. It was the top story on CNN.

20130809-182843.jpg

Friday: on the dock with Son Two! Next week: Kennebunkport!

20130809-183017.jpg

Oh, and I almost forgot: my only film hero, Spike Lee, responded to a tweet I made. I can die, now.

20130809-191402.jpg


Sun set or Sun rise?

Look, I know lots of folks will be positively giddy that Sun News Network, along with some other applicants, didn’t get “mandatory carriage.” Some will be celebrating its imminent demise. (Some of them will even be journalists, which is a bit jarring: I mean, these days, what sane journalist derives any pleasure from the death of yet another media organization? But I digress.)

Here’s the thing, fellow progressives: sorry, but Sun News isn’t going to die. The CRTC decision – and I can’t believe I’m going to say this about the CRTC – has released a nuanced and, dare I say it, devilishly clever decision. You should actually read it, here. (Or read one of the bestest/fairest reporters in Canada, the Globe’s Steve Ladurantaye, here.) And when you do, you’ll agree with me: Sun News isn’t going to die at all. It in fact has been given everything it wanted.

More than anything else, Sun News wanted parity, placement and (for lack of a better alliterative word) a bit of patriotism. Its argument was that you obviously can’t attract eyeballs when your destiny is determined by a multinational who happens to own your competitor, and who sticks you up on channel 496 (or not at all). It also argued that you can’t attract sufficient revenue when your main competitors get “mandatory carriage” on cable, and you don’t.  It argued that foreign media multinationals were getting a better deal than Canadian outfits.

And it got what it wanted. Here’s three reasons why:

  1. The CRTC decision will ultimately create a new category of licences for Canadian all-news channels, like the ones found on CTV and CBC as well as SNN.  It’s asking for public comment on all that, sure.  But the CRTC decision will force cable companies to offer all Canadian national news services, including SNN.  That’s parity.
  2. The CRTC’s clever plan will put all these news services in close proximity on your TV dial.  It will also put all national news services – CTV and CBC included – in a package.  And it’ll force cable companies to offer it.  That’s placement.
  3. The CRTC will put Canadian news channels – you know, Sun News, CTV News Channel and CBC News Network – on a higher priority footing than foreign-owned news channels, like CNN or Al Jazeera.  That’s the patriotism part: it’s dumb to give more to foreign-owned networks than all-Canadian ones.  So the CRTC’s changing that.

The Sun-haters won’t be deterred, of course.  They’ll say  that the public consultation hasn’t been held yet, and none of these things have come to pass, blah blah blah.

That’s true, I guess.  But the fact (a) the CRTC is setting a land-speed record in holding a “consultation” in the dead of Summer and (b) the fact that its conclusions are identical to SNN’s submissions – ie., there is a problem that is “large” and “systemic” with respect to “the distribution of new and existing Canadian national news services on fair and commercially reasonable terms,” and there are “barriers [that] constitute a significant obstacle to the exchange of ideas on matters of public concern and the overall democratic dialogue in Canada, principles that the Canadian broadcasting system has a duty to facilitate” – strongly suggest, ahem, what the outcome will be.

When the CRTC says that you haven’t been treated in a “fair and commercially reasonable way” – when they say that democracy itself is hurt when there isn’t a full “exchange of ideas” – then, well, you know what that means.

It means that Sun News has gotten everything it wanted, and then some.

Just watch.