More than the B.C.-Alberta pipeline fracas. More than the premiers demanding more for health care. More than transfer payments to have-not provinces, or even whether we should have a province-led national energy strategy.

The Quebec provincial election. More than any other provincial issue, that is the one — comme toujours — with the greatest implications for Canada and Canadian politicians. No other provincial concern comes remotely close to the high-stakes contest now underway in the province of Quebec. The outcome will define our national politics for years to come.

Here’s a possible scenario, in 10 problematic steps. It ends with a solution.

One: The remarkable political career of Jean Charest comes to an end, with a loss on Sept. 4 to the separatist Parti Quebecois leader, Pauline Marois. For months, polls have shown Charest is either behind or tied with his PQ rival. If Marois wins a majority in the first week of September, it is difficult to see how Charest can remain at the helm of his party. Federalism will have lost its most effective francophone advocate since Pierre Trudeau and Jean Chretien.

Two: Global, national and sub-national economies will continue to slide. Unemployment will go up, growth will go down. In Quebec, where Stephen Harper is the most detested prime minister in generations, the PQ will do what it has done many times in the past — it will blame far-away anglophone Ottawa for Quebec’s economic woes.

Three: Harper — with precious little caucus representation in Quebec, and even less credibility — will get more unpopular with Quebec voters. His stands on energy, the environment and social programs will continue to rankle progressive Quebecois.

Comments (25)

Tees made up by my man Hallice at tobeseen.ca! On sale at our Ottawa show tomorrow night at the Elmdale!

Comments (5)

Here.

(And, no SFH isn’t on there.  During the round-robin, we deliberately threw our guitars at the netting to ensure we got a shitty band to go against in the semi-finals.  We were disqualified.  But come to our gig anyway! We’re raising money for Pussy Riot’s defence!)

Comments (15)

I (and one other, who wants to tell her story) warned plenty of folks.  They didn’t listen.

Comments (0)

I haven’t lived full-time in Calgary since 1987, when I graduated from law school, but who cares! If “Calgary Joe” can run, so can I! Anyone else wanna run with me?  Even a quick stopover at Calgary International Airport counts towards the residency requirement in the CPC!  C’mon – it’ll be fun!

Comments (12)

And, when the CRG starts digging into the private lives of Liberal leadership candidates, as they now will, the Grits won’t be able to say a bloody word about it.  Because they brought this guy back.  What a joke.

Comments (10)

A few days ago, Jon Latvis got in a bit of PR trouble. Anti-Racist Canada spotted a photo of Latvis, in full stormtrooper regalia, meeting with Toronto mayor Rob Ford. They sent the picture to me, and Ford and his staff ended up having (another) bad day.

Latvis, too. The guitarist for neo-Nazi band Rahowa was upset about the attention. He wrote me an email suggesting that the swastika tattoo on his arm wasn’t, er, a swastika.

Latvis also called the Sun newsroom, and they assigned a police beat guy to write up Latvis’ complaint. He was threatening to sue, the Sun guy told me. Let him sue, I said. You need a reputation before you can sue for damage to it, I said.

Latvis was delighted by the resulting story, I am told, and I could see why. He was basically permitted to lie his face off, and also claim that he didn’t know what Rahowa was singing about during the many years he performed with them. He denied being an anti-Semite and a white supremacist, too.

So, the good ARC folks got to work. Their posting is found here.

Personally, I still think a picture is worth 1,000 words. In Latvis’ case, the pictures below also eliminate any doubt whatsoever about who Jon Latvis really is, and what he stands for. They also make clear he’s a liar and a creep.

So, sue away, Latvis. I’m bored, at the moment, and need some entertainment. You’ll do.

Latvis’ web site, wherein he says he played with Rahowa, which means “racial holy war.”

Latvis, left, with Nazi skins at Tri-City show in 2001. Look like a fascist salute to you? Me, too.

Latvis onstage in 2001. Blood and Honour is an international neo-Nazi music network.  The Celtic Cross above his shoulder signifies racial separation.  It’s also the logo for Stormfront, the biggest global hate site.

The view of the stage at a gig Latvis performed at in 2005. That’s a swastika on the left, of course.

Comments (33)

It’s going to be a schmozzle. A circus. A travesty.

In other words, the usual.

Comments (3)

Right on cue.  I didn’t know Marois was going to say this, but I certainly anticipated it in my Sun column, filed this morning and out on Sunday:

“Two: global, national and sub-national economies will continue to slide.  Unemployment will go up, growth will go down. In Quebec – where Stephen Harper is the most detested Prime Minister in generations – the PQ will do what it has done many times in the past: it will blame far-away anglophone Ottawa for Quebec’s economic woes.”

Here we go.

Comments (17)

From Tim Juhlke, timothyjuhlke2@hotmail.com, an instant classic!

So anyone who actually wants to defend this nation is a nose breather you pathetic left wing bitch. Diversity is a weakness you traitor piece of shit. You and your like are the biggest enemies the western world has. Japan, Russia and the Ukraine are smarther than lefties. Third world immigration is an influx of destruction, welfare and criminality. Those nations recognize that. You blame economics for Black crime, Blame black culture moron. If you think you can simply give our nation away without a fight dream on. You need to go you low IQ scumbag. If they try an Obama trip here it will be destroyed. You need to be slapped out you fucking pathetic excuse for a man. This country was made by white people for white people and if you don’t like it get the fuckout.

Comments (35)