March 10: your morning Robocon
Something tells me that treating Stephen Maher like a leper isn’t a great media-management strategy.
Sort of suggests they have lots to hide, don’t it?
Something tells me that treating Stephen Maher like a leper isn’t a great media-management strategy.
Sort of suggests they have lots to hide, don’t it?
Their strategy: abuse the trust of senior citizens. What a bunch of scumbags:
Elections Canada investigators sifting through a flood of complaints that have emerged about dirty tricks in the spring 2011 campaign have started to notice this pattern as they call back Canadians to verify details of the suspicious phone calls they have reported receiving.
Most of those who received an automated phone call telling them their polling station had been changed say they were previously contacted by the Conservative Party and indicated that they would not be supporting their local Tory candidate.
Now federal elections officials say that the fraudulent phone calls targeted older voters.
“Every single person I’ve contacted has been (born) between 1947 and 1949,” said one unidentified Elections Canada employee who was following up on the complaints Friday morning.
There’s only one thing that can defeat him: Nathan Cullen – or, perhaps, Nathan Cullen’s idea.
Swear to God: if I was a member of the NDP, I’d be busting my hump for this guy.
Quote:
Who is REAL Women of Canada?
I wrote about them nearly two decades ago, in Web of Hate. Here are some of the things you should know about them:
At no point am I aware of REAL Women of Canada having denounced Hartmann or her involvement with neo-Nazi causes. Following the 1994 publication of Web of Hate, instead, REAL Women of Canada continued to promote bigotry and division, albeit less aggressively than their director Hartmann.
In the intervening years, then, REAL Women has consistently shown themselves to be anti-gay, anti-choice and anti-equality. There is plenty of evidence, for those who have the stomach for it. (Those who wish to provide cited examples in comments are encouraged to do so.)
I want to get a letter-writing campaign going, today – fittingly, on International Women’s Day – to Her Majesty and Rideau Hall about this outrage.
You can write to Her Majesty here, with the style and structure you should adopt.
You can write to Rideau Hall here.
This is important, on this day of all days. Please do this.
Norman Spector has known him for years, so too have many others who have a high regard for him. The suggestion that anyone would call a Member of the Order of Canada a “liar,” as the Campaign Research cabal have done, strikes me as inviting a lawsuit.
Here, from a regular commenter, is some further info about how John came to be invited to the Manning Centre vote-suprression discussion:
Actually, the Manning Centre promoted the campaign training school thing to their mailing list. One of our Green Party colleagues on the GPC Federal Council was a former Conservative-Reformer from Alberta, he received the promotional email, and forwarded it to a number of people (myself included) who were trying to professionalise the Green Party national campaign.
I blogged abouit it, and publicised it to the Green Party in general. John Fryer was Federal Council member for BC, and had just been made campaign Manager of Elizabeth May’s SGI Campaign in the pre-writ period. He was obviously preparing for the task, and enrolled himself in the Campaign School. You see, some of us wanted to transform the GPC voters list and conact database into a winning machine like CIMS, and start building a useful voter intention and issues based DB.
…the Manning Centre did not invite anybody in particular. I guess they figured if John had found out about it, he must be ‘true blue’…If you know John, then that is really funny. His entire life has been about Labour and Politics. While I do not know John Fryer very well, he has struck me as meticuloulsy honest and canny. If he said something happened, then it is true. If he merely suspected then he would have kept his mouth shut.
That is my opinion anyway, but at least it is formed with some pêrsonal knowledge about the person involved.
We shall find out, soon enough.