An open letter to Chris Blizzard, who I like

Christina Blizzard is a columnist for the Sun.  She’s pretty pro-Conservative – I can’t recall her ever writing anything that isn’t – but I like her.  She’s a good person, albeit a bit politically misguided.

This afternoon, she sent me an email.  Here’s what she said: “I have received a copy of a presentation you have been giving to unions about elections. At the end of it, you advise union members not to just take a lawn sign, but to get involved and “buy an ad.”  I am wondering if it is appropriate for someone who is a senior member of the Liberal campaign team to be advising third parties to do this during the election campaign.”

That was kind of…snarky, and erroneous, too.  In June, I was invited to speak one union, Local 46, the plumber’s union.  The three-hour presentation I gave to them didn’t simply say “buy an ad.”  The folks who asked me to speak wanted to avoid vote-splitting that might lead to another Harris-style government under Tim Hudak.  I spoke to about 200 members, who were described to me as members of all of the political parties – Liberals, New Democrats and Conservatives.  It was a great session, and any member could attend.  Some folks agreed with me, some didn’t.  But it was fun.

So I responded to Chris: “You’d have to send it to me, my friend.  But, before you do that, are you saying that unions should be prohibited from advertising?”

She didn’t answer that.  I did, however, get the deck – which I surmise had been given to Chris by PCs, who are in a free-fall in urban centres, and are starting to full-on panic.  Here’s what she wrote: “[Your] exhortation to buy ads and get politically active is on page 26. It also makes reference to the “Not this time” advertising campaign targeting Ernie Eves.  I am wondering what Elections Ontario would have to say about the connection between you in your position with the Liberal campaign exhorting a union to engage in third party advertising during a campaign.”

That, too, was a bit snarky, given that we are supposed to be colleagues and all that.  But, whatever.  She’s big on the Conservatives, and I understand that.  I also didn’t like the insinuation that what I’d said in my presentation was against the law, but again – whatever.  She has a job to do.

So here’s what I wrote back: “Chris:  I was asked by the union to come and speak to them before the election about how to avoid a Hudak-PC government. I spoke to about 200 people, and they were introduced to me as members of all of the political parties. I encouraged them to get involved in the democratic process in any way they could. One way they could do that is to advertise, and to of course ensure that they followed all of the Elections Ontario rules.  To my knowledge, they have done no advertising at all. Since you obviously intend to write about this, I will place the deck on my web site along with your emails. I prefer to have these discussions out in the open, so there can be no confusion about what was said. Have a great day.”

And, as promised, here’s the deck, every word of it.  If you feel like Chris apparently does – that I urged the union to break the law – I encourage you to promptly lodge a complaint about me with Elections Ontario.  Here’s their email, to save you some time: info@elections.on.ca.  Good luck.

Oh, and Chris?  Like I say: the group I spoke to hasn’t produced any advertising I am aware of – unlike some groups closely connected to Tim Hudak’s PCs.

I look forward to you writing about that, too.

 


Horwath continues to stand with Naziism minimizer

Hamilton-area NDP candidate Anthony Marco’s rambling, tongue-in-cheek podcast and blog rants are supplying the party’s critics with no end of ammunition.

The Liberals unearthed several more Wednesday in which the 42-year-old teacher calls Ontarians lazy, opines that elections are a drag and condemns parents for taking their “f …… kids” along with them to Las Vegas.

The candidate for Niagara West-Glanbrook was on the hot seat earlier for drawing a parallel between Nazism and religion during a profanity-laced podcast a year ago.


Ontario NDP candidate Anthony Marco, in his own words (undoctored and updated!)

Ontario NDP candidate Anthony Marco in a TVO interview.

Yesterday, to defend her friend Anthony Marco, Andrea Horwath allowed a doctored transcript of Marco’s now-infamous words (National Socialism is a “religion,” and those who oppose Naziism are “pretty messed up”) to be issued to the news media.

Here’s his crazed podcast in its entirety.  Listen to it, especially around the seven-minute mark. Is this part of the “positive campaign” Horwath claims to be running?

UPDATE: And the crazy just keeps on coming! And we’ve only listened to a fraction of his online lunacy!


Uncharitable

This is exactly what I was talking about yesterdayConservatives using the power of government to silence critics, by taking away their charitable status.

Oh, and the Wind Power Ontario outfit mentioned in the story?  They’re a Tory front, full stop.  Meanwhile, the taxpayer “federation” is basically an arm of the Conservatives.  They work hand-in-glove with PC campaigns, and have done so for years.

And I may even have seen an email in which Wind Power is seen helping to map out Tea Party North strategy!  Now, where is that email?

 


The Gap

…and I don’t mean the clothing store.

I mean Andrea Horwath’s disappointing Ontario NDP!  Did they actually release a doctored transcript to the media in the now-infamous Anthony Marco story?  (See here and here and here.)

Next thing you know, Andrea will be saying nice things about Richard M. Nixon!


New Ontario NDP logo.


Uncharitable politics

As a lot of you know, I support a lot of NGOs.  A lot of those NGOs do work in respect of the environment, animal welfare, and so on.

In recent months, I have been hearing from worried NGOs – over and over – that they have been targeted by federal Conservatives over their charitable status.  If they lose that status, they lose the ability to operate.

The Cons – federally and provincially – have been targeting organizations who take public positions they disapprove of (you know, the environment is good, animal abuse is bad, etc.).  They have been sending around bureaucrats to tell NGOs that they are “under review.”  The message has been clear: if you continue to advocate in a way we don’t like, you will lose your charitable status.  Federally, Conservatives have gone after a very well-known environmentalist, because they don’t like the things he says.  They want to put him out of business.

Here’s where you come in.

I’m collecting information about this McCarthyite practice for a possible column, and (for certain) my next book.  If you have any information about that, I’d love to hear from you, at wkinsella@hotmail.com.  Confidentiality guaranteed.

This is the worst kind of politics – and it has to stop.  Disagreeing with NGOs is fine.  But using the power of government to bankrupt NGOs you disagree with?  That isn’t fine.