Calgary with guns


My family has lived in both Dallas and Calgary. Whenever people would ask me what the difference was between the two places, I’d usually say: “Dallas is Calgary with lots of guns.”

Thus the photo of the guy above, walking near last night’s Dallas protest. He was initially “a person of interest.” But let me stress that what he’s doing – walking around with an assault weapon – is totally legal down there. 

Every decent person deplores the terrible losses of life in Louisiana, Minnesota and now Texas. Everyone wants to stop this madness. 

But one thing should be very clear: guns are too readily available in the United States. And not every American understands that. 



My wife kicks ass: a play

[The scene: corner of Woodbine and Danforth. After a movie. Red light. It’s hot. Two young girls cross the road. Guy in trucker’s cap pulls up and starts hollering something at the girls. Before I know what’s happening:]

My wife, rolling down window and yelling loudly at the guy: THEY’RE SOMEBODY’S DAUGHTERS, YOU SEXIST PRICK!

[Long pause. We drive South.]

Me: You are so totally awesome. 

THE END.


Another day in the US, another black man murdered by another non-black cop

Here:

And a new video of the murder of Alton Sterling has come out, this one shot by the convenience store owner in Baton Rouge. The store owner called the shooting of Sterling – who had both arms pinned when police claimed he was reaching for a gun – a “murder,” quote unquote. Because it is.

Why is all this happening? Two more murders of black men by non-black cops in 48 hours in the U.S.: why?

Simple:

  1. Most non-black cops in the U.S. believe most young black men are gang members.  Period.
  2. There are too many guns in the U.S. Period.

There will be plenty of protests, sure.  But nothing is going to change.  It’s just another day in the United States.

They can’t help themselves.

 


Jason Kenney and caucus supporters photographed on an outing on Bow River yesterday

CmumpTzXgAAmIhs

If Warren Kinsella was still alive, he’d be making a Barney joke right about now.

Okay, that’s kind of mean, but I’m kind of a mean guy.  Besides, Kenney made it personal first, so I’m going to hound him into his grave.  (Reubenesque Richard Nixon lookalike.)

And, while we are on the subject of Jason’s quest to lead the third party in the Alberta legislature, I note that several columnists upended their bedpans, yesterday, in the bit of real estate usually reserved for their opinion columns.  If anyone can unite the Right, it’s Jason! He’s a contender!  And so on. A pantload does not begin to describe it.

How come? Well, here’s why, found – typically – at the very end of an entirely-missing-the-point Calgary Herald story about the PC’s Jason Kenney and Wildrose’s Brian Jean:

Though Jean said he’d listen to the wishes of the Wildrose membership, he added that he doubted the party wants him to step aside to unite under a Kenney-led PC Party.

“That is not going to happen,” Jean said.

Talk about burying the lede.

Anyway. As noted on this wee web site many days ago, why does everyone assume that Brian Jean is going to simply pull over, hand the keys to Jason, and walk off into the sunset?  He isn’t going to do that, but don’t count on the Herald to actually notice.

Now, where is that Barney?