Do you ever feel like you are living in history? Because you are.

Right now.

For too many, history is distant, abstract. It’s scribblings in dog-eared high school text books. A bit of dialogue recalled from a movie, or something said on a guided tour while on vacation.

For too many, history is events that are recalled, perhaps, but never really experienced. They’re just some words on a page, like these.

The great American writer James Baldwin knew what history is. He lived through it and sought to capture it in his books and essays. “History,” said Baldwin, “is not the past. We carry our history with us.

“We are our history.”

Now, people are busy. They are scrambling to get across town to get on to work on time, or get a kid to hockey practice, or pay the hydro bill, or catch a few hours of sleep. They don’t have time to ponder history. They only have time for now, right now.

But history doesn’t wait for us. It’s happening all the time. Right now, in particular.

Right now, just about everywhere, sociopaths are marching in city streets, condemning the victims of Hamas, not Hamas. Right now, in places we believed to be places of higher learning, our children are being taught that barbarism is acceptable, even defensible. Right now, in our legislatures, elected people are publishing rationalizations for murder.

Right now, Jewish businesses – places that employ everyday people doing everyday things, trying to get by – are being targeted by chanting, menacing monsters. Right now.

At Cafe Landwer, for example. History is happening here, in this bright and sunny Toronto restaurant.

The people who founded Cafe Landwer know history. They have put it right on their website.

They write: “In 1919 on a picturesque street in the center of Berlin, Moshe Landwer opens a small and romantic coffee house, which quickly turns into one of the city’s favorite hangout spots. In 1933, with the rise to power of the Nazi regime, Moshe Landwer, along with his family, makes aliya [immigrates] and settles in Tel Aviv.”

Not mentioned, there, was what happened to Jewish businesses in Berlin, not long after Landwer left Germany: Kristallnacht. “Crystal night,” it was called, to describe the slivers of glass that littered the streets. After Nazi thugs smashed windows of Jewish businesses.
Terrorizing them. Demonizing them.

And now, more than a century later, the café that Moshe Landwer created is being targeted again, in the most unlikely of places. Not in Nazi Germany – in Canada. Here, now.

Thugs descended on Cafe Landwer on the weekend. Screaming at patrons. Chanting “boycott.” In an insane, spit-flecked rage. Targeting a restaurant?

For being Jewish.

My colleague Brian Lilley and I went to Cafe Landwer on Monday (more…)

Comments (9)

Comments (28)

Josh Gilman is a writer. And the whole world needs to see what he’s written. 

And, in the past few days, a lot of the world has. 

Josh is Canadian, a Dad, a communications specialist, and was formerly involved in politics. The party he belonged to isn’t actually relevant. What’s relevant is what he wrote, because he wrote it from his heart. As a human being. As a believer in humanity. 

And as a Jew. 

His blogged essay – titled “Why you might have lost all your Jewish friends this week and didn’t even know it” – is simply extraordinary. And, as noted, it has gone around the world. 

Usually, he told me, his blog entries get seen by a couple hundred people, mainly family and friends. But this one? It’s now getting closer to one million views – with half a million in the States alone, and thousands more in far-flung places like Ireland, Sweden and South Africa. And, of course, Israel. 

There’s not enough room here, unfortunately, to quote all of what Josh wrote.  If you are online, a link to all of it is here. Read it. The gist of it, really, is found in these passages:

• “When you are Jewish, you are always aware that there is a large population in the world that wants to kill you. Even if they aren’t trying now, you read history and you see that every few generations, at the very least, some group tries to kill all or at least a lot of Jewish people.
We may like your posts that say ‘never again,’ but we never fully believe it.”

• “Did you know that that is a category of friend that every Jewish person has in their mind? Who would I run to? Who would hide me? We don’t wonder if; we wonder when. Because we know that whether it is indeed us, or whether it is our brothers and sisters in Israel, or in France, or in Pittsburgh, it will happen again somewhere.”

• “The greatest soothing to my soul this past week has been seeing friends and old colleagues post notes of support. It truly means the world. It’s not too late. But consider this carefully, because it is not a game. If you read this and choose to reach out, choose to take a stand publicly.”

Most of us do not ever need to wonder if someone will come to kill us one day. Or, wonder who will take us in, so that we can survive. But Josh has. His family and friends have. Jews have.

Josh and his family have temporarily relocated to the United States for work – I won’t say where – but he agreed to answer some of my questions about what he wrote. He told me he started writing his essay to “process my own thoughts and feelings.” He sent it to Jewish friends. They said it reflected what they were feeling, too.

“The response,” Josh says, “has been overwhelming. I’ve received messages from all over the world. From grandmothers in Germany, to writers in Hollywood, from almost every corner of the planet. Jews and gentiles.”

He’s proud, and he should be. But how is he feeling, these days?

“Different waves,” he says. “Waves of grief, at what has happened. Waves of concern for the ongoing war. Waves of defiance, [that] the terrorists and murderers will not win – and we will win and we will thrive.”

He pauses. He mentions the so-called “day of jihad,” last Friday. “That night my youngest daughter was crying in the middle of the night…I just held her and stared at her beautiful face, thinking of every Jewish baby that was murdered. And I was overwhelmed by both gratitude that I was holding my darling daughter, and by grief for every family destroyed in Israel.”

I want to keep quoting this amazing young man, but I’ve run out of room. I ask him if he has any final words, anything that he wants non-Jews to know, too.

He muses. “For my non-Jewish friends, you simply have no idea how meaningful your words of love and support are. It’s never too late to reach out and it means everything.”

So, there you go, friends of Israel and the Jewish community.

Listen to Josh Gilman – and reach out.

Comments (1)

If you’re going to finally confirm that justice was obstructed to hide obstruction of justice, when would you do that?

When voters are focussed on a bloody war in the Middle East, probably.

There are lot of moving parts in that lede. Let us explain.

And here’s one truism, which is eternal: if you’re in government, and you’ve got bad news coming out – “taking out the trash,” as they say – then you need to come up with something else to distract readers/viewers/listeners. You need to “change the channel.”

The Justin Trudeau government are masters at it. They may not be very good at actually governing. But at changing the channel? They’re without equal.

Trudeau was dropping in the polls, so he announced a shiny new cabinet. He was getting hammered on the Chinese election interference story, so he picked a fight with some Premiers on health care funding. And, of course, whenever any unhelpful issue raises its head, Team Trudeau will haul out that hoary old chestnut, abortion, to distract. And so on.

This week, they did it again. For four years or so, the RCMP had wanted to investigate allegations that Trudeau and his circle obstructed justice. That is, that they tried to get former Attorney General Jody Wilson Raybould to stop a prosecution of SNC-Lavalin, a big Liberal Party donor, for corruption.

Eleven people in and around Trudeau’s PMO did that, we now know, at least 44 times in 2018. Each time, Wilson Raybould refused – and she ultimately was driven out of government, and the Liberal Party, for refusing to do what would almost certainly be obstruction of justice.

And, now, we have learned that the RCMP wanted to investigate whether crimes had been committed. But they couldn’t – because Trudeau and his cabinet refused to cooperate.

In 2021, as the Mounties were nearing of a months-long probe into obstruction of justice in the SNC-Lavalin scandal, they hit a roadblock: Trudeau et al. wouldn’t give them access to cabinet documents about what went on. The RCMP commissioner personally made the request, no less, and was rebuffed.

Documents finally released this week – while war was raging in Israel and Gaza – revealed that the RCMP had “pushed as hard as possible,” and “exhausted all avenues” to get the evidence they needed to justify prosecution. But, in true Tricky Dick Nixon fashion, the Trudeau cabal said no.

The RCMP needed Trudeau’s gang to waive cabinet confidence and show them the evidence.

But Trudeau wouldn’t. As result, the damning documents declared, the RCMP concluded it had “insufficient evidence” to purse the case any further.

To some folks, this seems outrageous (it is) and shocking evidence of the Mounties’ ineffectiveness (it isn’t). Here’s why: section 39 of the Canada Evidence Act prevents cabinet secrets from becoming public from as long as 20 years. The bar is absolute. If the cabinet says no, the police can’t overrule them.

(That’s not all: if a police force wants to serve a search warrant or conduct an interview with an MP on Parliament Hill, they can’t. The Speaker can stop them – and, in the past, has done so more than once.)

So, Canada is a democracy, yes. But, in this democracy, some of us are more equal than others.

The rest of us can’t stonewall a police criminal investigation indefinitely. But Prime Ministers and cabinet ministers can. And, as we saw this week, they did.

It’s like obstruction of justice to cover up an obstruction of justice, you might say.

And, what better time to finally admit it, than when Canadians’ are paying attention to the war in the Middle East?

 

Comments (21)