In Tuesday’s Sun: read all about him

You’re holding it in your hands right now: one of the reasons for Newtown.

All of us have been reading incessant theories about the myriad reasons why a nobody murdered 20 children in Newtown, Conn., last Friday morning.

Americans are gun crazy, and they let crazy people access guns. Insufficient attention paid to mental health issues. A gun lobby that cares more about profit than children. A sick society that sees gay marriage as a threat to families, but not assault weapons.

Those are all plausible reasons for the extraordinary evil that took place in Newtown.

But the media? We’re partly responsible, too. We covered the story, and we’re also covered in blame.

Not because we insisted on interviewing terrified six-year-olds on air, actually asked them how they “feel.” That was evil enough, but not a root cause of the evil, per se.

Not because we descended on the place like vultures, picking through the viscera for something that someone else hadn’t yet reported and no one wanted to know about. That, too, was despicable.

But that isn’t why Newtown happened, either.

If the homicidal loser — the nobody — was still here, he’d tell us why.

As surely as that little bastard is burning in hell right about now, this surely is why he did it: Because the media turned a loser — nobody — into a somebody. We made him famous.

It was an act of unspeakable evil that lasted only a few moments, but we have been immortalizing the evildoer — making him a somebody the world will remember for years to come.

I won’t write his name, because that’s what the monster wanted.

In the aftermath of these mass murders, there’s always a sickening familiarity to the predictable profiles: A young man. A loner, a bit of an oddball. Not good at making friends, not ever having a girlfriend. Not academically stupid, but no real achievements in life, either. A nobody.

For untold years, they seethe at this. They silently rage at it, playing their infernal single-player shooter games, maybe torturing someone’s pet. For years, they languish in deserved anonymity, pitying their lot in life.

And then, one day, they pick up a discarded newspaper — or turn on a radio or TV news broadcast — and they are electrified. They receive their inspiration, like a telegram delivered by God.

Columbine, Aurora, the myriad shootings that have happened since Friday: The media dutifully tell the killers-to-be how to achieve immortality. Don some combat gear, pack up a bag with some easily acquired assault weapons, then go hunting for humans.

Pick a school or a hospital or a mall or a movie theatre, for maximum effect. We in the media do the rest.

Back when I was in law school, I worked at newspapers in Calgary and Ottawa to pay the rent.

Usually, I worked the cop beat. One day, I asked one of my editors why we never covered suicides.

I asked him why we never named the many people who kill themselves — usually with guns, often around holidays — and describe what happened.

“Because, if we did that,” my editor said, not even looking up, “we’d have a lot of other nobodies killing themselves. Just to get their names in the paper.”


The Christmas of tears

A few weeks ago, I opined – and I’m a former speechwriter to no less than Jean Chretien, remember – that political speeches don’t matter anymore.

I was wrong about that.  And the speech below is why.  It is Obama’s greatest oratory ever; it is his Gettysburg Address.  I confess that I cried when I read it for the first time, at the end of a long Sunday of helping one son to study, and helping another to get to and from hockey games and practices.

One of my editors at the Sun said this to me last night:  “I take back what I wrote about this being the time of year with nothing to write about.  I wish that were true.”

Me, too.  What a terrible time this is. This is the Christmas of tears.


Harper will win in 2015

…that’s what I’ve been saying to folks across Canada since the release of Fight The Right, a few weeks ago.  It’s the incontrovertible reality: conservatives winning majorities in a country where the majority are progressive.  They do that because the progressive vote is split.

Harper’s vote is slipping and shrinking, but it still doesn’t matter.  As long as progressives – Liberals, New Democrats, Greens – continue to fight amongst themselves, Stephen Harper will continue to benefit.  You may not like it, you may not approve, but that’s the way it is.  It’s math.

Graves, here, with whom Bricker and others agree this morning:

The Conservative party may well benefit from a perfect progressive storm of vote-splitting and a futile rise in Green party votes resulting in few or no seats — as in 2008, when almost 7 per cent support for the Greens still failed to produce a single seat. The slightly invigorated Liberal party and the slightly diminished NDP will now saw off about 50 per cent of voters and the lion’s share of the progressive vote. A even more popular Green Party is still far away from levels where their popularity can translate into seats under the first-past-the-post system. So it may well be the case that a relatively stagnant and diminished Conservative party is in position to post another majority with even lower numbers than they had going into 2011.


Escape

This makes sense to me. My book Kicking Ass was released on 9/11. It didn’t do very well. People wanted to escape from reality.

I suspect the same thing’s happening again. Some will want to immerse themselves in the tragedy: as many, or more, will want to escape.


In Sunday’s Sun: this was written before Friday, and it shows

With the world ending in a week or so, it’s time to take stock of things.

Because it is, in fact, ending. Ask my son. He’s in the middle of exams, and he has no doubts whatsoever about the imminent Apocalypse.

“Dad, there’s no point in me writing any exams. The world is ending on Dec. 21. Check out the Mayan calendar.”

Dec. 21, 2012, as you perhaps know, marks the end of a 5,000-year Mayan calendar cycle.

According to the now-departed tall foreheads in that ancient Mayan culture, the cycle that commenced in 3114 B.C. will conclude on Friday, the day the world ends.

You may laugh, but lots of folks have set up Doomsday Clubs to mark the occasion, thereby providing themselves with an excellent opportunity to party hearty.

Five countries — Mexico, Belize, Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras — plan festivities to mark the End Time, too.

So, it’s ending.

Nice knowing you, etc.

As such, it is time to reflect on what will be missed, politically, and what won’t.

Politicians and political stuff we’ll miss:

Um. Well, that part was easy. But what about things we won’t miss so much?

That list is longer.

– The Harper government. They didn’t see the global recession coming, and they denied it when it arrived. They got us into a structural deficit.

They promised accountability, but have been more secretive than the Star Chamber.

They promised ethics, then later pleaded guilty to breaking election laws — and are back in Federal Court this week on charges they cheated in six ridings in 2011’s election.

They are arrogant, thuggish and increasingly unpopular. They are a Biblical pestilence. They won’t be missed.

– Jason Kenney. He detests multiculturalism, quite a few immigrants and an impressive number of his fellow citizens, too.

He says fellow Tories are “dishonest and hypocritical” for participating in a parliamentary pension plan, then spent $750,000 monitoring himself in ethnic media.

He called Serbian ethnic cleansing “modest,” albeit compared to Saddam’s genocide in Iraq.

He compares legal abortions “child abuse” and “slavery.”

He says Sikhs can get “overheated” and “use the race card.”

Buh-bye, Jason. See you on the other side — or not.

– Bev Oda. She spent $5,500 to take limousines to the Juno Awards. Later, she was caught spending another $15,000 on limos. She was facing a parliamentary inquiry for altering a government document.

She spent $665 a night at a swank London hotel, and bought orange juice at $16 a glass. Gone, but not forgotten. Not forgiven, either.

– The F-35 fighter jets. Michael Ignatieff warned them, but they didn’t listen. He said the nearly $50 billion price tag was a waste of taxpayers’ money and the sole-sourcing was a mistake. The former Liberal leader said he’d cancel the purchase; the Cons insisted they wouldn’t. They’ve now cancelled it. Hasta la vista, F-35s.

– The goddamn “Action Plan” ads. Newsflash! The recession ended. Despite that, the Conservatives continue to spend more than

$55 million on government propaganda, mostly in the form of those ubiquitous campaign-style “Action Plan” TV spots. Harper promised to spend less on government advertising. He didn’t. A disgrace.

– The Senate. It’s an unelected, anti-democratic abomination. Harper once famously said “the upper house remains a dumping ground for the favoured cronies of the prime minister,” and he seemed to mean it. Now he’s turned it into “a dumping ground for favoured cronies,” of, er, him. Shame.

We could go on — Sen. Patrick Brazeau, listeria and tainted beef, Bruce Carson, robocalls — but we’ve run out of room.

Run out of time, too, apparently.

But I remind my son: Exams are still on.

Get back to the books.


Dear gun nuts

Don’t try and post here. I won’t approve your comments.

I’m sick of you. I detest you. I don’t want to hear from you. No sane person wants to hear from you.

You’re a variant on al-Qaeda, and you’re too deranged to realize it.

Go to Hell, where the likes of you belong.


Why did Ontario’s PCs attack Pupatello?

…because that, in and of itself, is quite interesting. They issued the limp attack piece below – helpfully edited by Your Humble Narrator – within minutes of Sandra making her Economic Club speech earlier today. They haven’t done that with any other Ontario Liberal leadership candidate. Not one of them.

Why? Because she’s the only one who can beat them, that’s why.

The release, with helpful edits, gratis:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
December 13th, 2012

Sandra Pupatello’s Plan for the Economy – BLAH BLAH 

QUEEN’S PARK – Sandra Pupatello’s recently released economic policies are not “the plan forward” but rather a “BLAH BLAH BLAH plan” that will not BLAH BLAH BLAH, Ontario PC MPP Monte McNaughton said today.

“Pupatello’s “plan” does not make a single mention of BLAH BLAH BLAH,” McNaughton said. “Ontario families want to see a government that is focused on BLAH BLAH the economy, but BLAH BLAH BLAH Sandra Pupatello.”

“She sat at the cabinet table and BLAH BLAH to BLAH and the BLAH BLAH policies that BLAH BLAH BLAH. Just imagine what Ontario’s economy will look like if she is at the helm of a Pupatello-McGuinty government.”(ED.: well, okay. We like it.)

“Pupatello has BLAH BLAH to fix the economy and her idea of economic recovery is BLAH that the McGuinty Liberals have BLAH BLAH,” said McNaughton. “Today’s announcement demonstrated that Pupatello is BLAH BLAH BLAH. BLAH BLAH with Pupatello at the helm.”

“Sandra Pupatello is BLAH BLAH BLAH. She will be remembered as BLAH BLAH,” concluded McNaughton.

Contact: Christine BLAHjold | (416) 325-1330 | christine.bujold@pc.ola.org


Pupatello’s economic vision

Just got back from her speech to a packed house at the Economic Club of Canada.  It was really, really good.  Tory friends came up to me and said they now plan to vote for her, no less.

You can read it here.  And you should.