There haven’t been a lot of reviews so far – book pages are becoming a lot less plentiful, sadly – but Matt Price at the Huffington Post gave it a thorough read.
Here it is in true blurb style: “[Kinsella] deserves credit for writing this book, period… he is absolutely on the money…[Fight The Right] is well worth picking up.”
Ha! But you can (and should) read his full review, here, bouquets and brickbats included.
Says it all, don’t you think?
Gerry Nicholls is formerly a “senior officer” with the far-right lobby group, the National Citizens Coalition. Last week, I wrote a column that mentioned in passing Stephen Harper’s time heading the NCC. Nicholls objected to what I wrote, and apparently sent a letter to the Sun. Here is what he wrote, in part:
When I saw Nicholls’ letter on his web site, I commneted, and asked him a question he has yet to answer. I asked him if Harper had done anything, during his time at the NCC, that falls within the definition of lobbying under the relevant legislation:
“(a) communicate with a public office holder in respect of
(i) the development of any legislative proposal by the Government of Canada or by a member of the Senate or the House of Commons,
(ii) the introduction of any Bill or resolution in either House of Parliament or the passage, defeat or amendment of any Bill or resolution that is before either House of Parliament,
(iii) the making or amendment of any regulation as defined in subsection 2(1) of the Statutory Instruments Act
(iv) the development or amendment of any policy or program of the Government of Canada,
(v) the awarding of any grant, contribution or other financial benefit by or on behalf of Her Majesty in right of Canada, or
(vi) the awarding of any contract by or on behalf of Her Majesty in right of Canada; or
(b) arrange a meeting between a public office holder and any other person.”
As you can see, the definition of lobbying under the Act is quite broad. Grassroots lobbying – which is what Nicholls has now admitted Harper did – is a communication technique that encourages individual members of the public (or organizations) to communicate directly with public office holders, in an attempt to influence government decisions. This type of lobbying usually relies on media or advertising and results in mass letter writing and fax campaigns, telephone calls to public office holders, and public demonstrations, and so on.
That’s precisely what Harper’s NCC did, according to one of Harper’s own senior officers: grassroots lobbying.
So, again, the question: did Harper do any unregistered lobbying for the NCC? Because unregistered lobbying is contrary to the law.
The answer, if Nicholls is to be believed, is yes. That’s news, perhaps, so I plan to write about this in a future Sun column. In the meantime, however, Gerry Nicholls might want to think before he rushes to his typewriter.
If this bastard thinks we’re going to forget about these women, he’s got another thing coming.
With a $50,000 entry fee, and a $500,000 spending limit – and, most of all, an end-of-January leadership convention – the Ontario Liberal executive is seeking to discourage minor candidates. They are also signalling that we need a leader with name recognition; there’s no time, now, for someone to get better-known – particularly with Christmas landing in the middle of this thing. Smart move, on both counts.
So who should we pick?
Before I offer up my handy five-point guide, gratis, I should observe that – for a lot of us – this leadership stuff is happening really, really fast. Less than a week ago, we had Dalton McGuinty, the winningest Liberal Premier in a Century. Less than a week later, he’s said that he’s resigning, and it’s left a lot of Ontario Liberals in shock. It has been a hard time, a sad time.
Filling his shoes is a tall order, and there should be no doubt about that. But I believe that, if we’re smart, we can pick a leader who will win the next election, which now seems certain to be in 2013.
In my many conversations with Ontario Liberals, I’ve asked them five questions. Answered right, the questions all point in the direction of one person, and one person only.
Here they are.
The answers to those questions are all pretty obvious, when you reflect on them. And they all suggest that only one person can win this thing, and win big.
Will she do it? I don’t know.
But if she does, me – and a lot of other folks – will be with her.
(Now, comment away. I’m interested to see what you folks think, as always.)
Can Canadian Liberalism survive? Is the party over?
The times are clearly dire, for Canadian Grits. One need only to survey newspaper opinion pages to know this is so.
“(There has been) a new round of media and public speculation about the imminent collapse of Canadian Liberalism,” wrote one respected analyst in the National Post. “The Liberal party (is) dying … the future (will) reveal Canadian national politics as a two-party struggle between the Conservatives and the NDP,” the Post declares in another column.
A Montreal Gazette opinion writer is similarly gloomy. The Liberal Party of Canada is buffeted by “alternate attacks of political depression and paranoia,” he intones. The Liberal brand is “under siege,” it is suggested.
The future is in doubt. “(Liberals are) likely to undergo further factional fighting as prospective contenders try to build support for their future leadership runs,” declares a Maclean’s cover story.
Liberals are “essentially rudderless,” yet another Post columnist writes. “(The Grits) failed to modernize and reposition the Liberal party.”
The columnist quotes a former national director of the Liberals: “The Liberals didn’t know where they were going, and still don’t.”
And so on, and so on. Everywhere you look, it seems, the story is the same. The assessments of Liberal fortunes are similarly dire.
With the federal Liberals in third place and seeking new leadership — and with the Ontario and Quebec Liberal parties effectively leaderless, and facing the prospect of being out of power for a long time to come, perhaps indefinitely — the Liberal party brand seems to be “dying,” as the Post columnist wrote.
From longtime friend, Chretien loyalist, and future Prime Minister Chris Collenette, who now resides in the land of my ancestors: Fight The Right takes the Emerald Isle by storm!
“Warren: I headed into town today with the family to run a couple of errands and wouldn’t you know that everywhere I went, I ran smack-dab into Fight The Right and I took a couple of photos along the way:
First I stopped into PJ Murphy’s used book store at 1 Lincoln Place across from Kennedy’s Pub. There sat was Fight The Right displayed prominently along with some other celebrated Irish writers. PJ took a look at your picture and told me he is from the Wexford Murphys who intermarried the Wexford Kinsellas and no doubt you are distant cousins – no word of lie. If you ignore the Ledrewesque bow-tie, there is some resemblance – although he is a tad bit older.
Then I rounded the corner to Merrion Square to pay a visit to Oscar Wilde, and wouldn’t you know it, resting in quite a serendipitous manner upon a fallen maple leaf, was another copy of Fight the Right.
After a visit to the play-park in St. Stephan’s Green and a leisurely stroll down past the Grafton street buskers, we stopped by to see what type of wares Ms. Malone was selling. Wouldn’t you know it, there sat another copy of Fight the Right?!
Then, and I couldn’t have arranged it even if it was 1993 and F. was with me – this costumed leprechaun kept wanting to get in the picture!
Following this little excursion and a train ride home on the DART along Dublin Bay, and after sending the kiddies home with their mother, I settled in at The Old Punch Bowl, one of my locals in Booterstown, Blackrock, and began to peruse the much talked about book. Review to follow, but from what I read so far (acknowledgements) I like what I see.”
The media who were criticizing Justin Trudeau and his Liberal supporters for a permitting “coronation” instead of a leadership contest?
Yeah, well, they’re the same geniuses now criticizing Dalton McGuinty’s Liberal supporters for wanting the Ontario Premier to enter the leadership race, and thereby make it a contest and not a coronation.
I swear to God: these guys are the type of people who demand crucifixion, and then complain about the view.
Rule of thumb: when they say to do something, do the polar opposite.
You can’t lose.