Perhaps they had to shut it down because they don’t know what “fulsome” means
One dictionary: Complimentary or flattering to an excessive degree: “they are almost embarrassingly fulsome in their appreciation.” It also means “copious.”
That’s probably not what she meant in her memo. But when the boss to the writers doesn’t know what a word means, it perhaps indicates the wrong people are getting the hook.
Quote unquote:
I love you, man
I like obits better than just about anything else in newspapers, most days, so it wasn’t unusual that I read about the passing of Goober. This part I read, then re-read:
Every straight man loves other men – their fathers and brothers, their grandfathers, and so on – and sometimes can even say so. But it’s hard. To the consternation of women, who are smarter about these things, we are socialized to never, ever say what Andy Griffiths said. We are taught that it is against our nature. That it’s weak.
That’s absurd, of course, and we know it. But we still do it. For instance, as I type this, I am wrestling with whether I should tell you if I have ever done what Andy Griffith did, so plainly, with his now-departed friend.
As many of my female friends will tell you, I believe that the vast majority of men are emotional cripples. We’re messed up. And, perhaps, our inability to be honest about our feelings is what lands us in trouble so frequently.
What say you, O Wise Readers? And, for the male ones, have any of you said what Andy Griffiths has said, recently?
Pollsters adopt “truthiness” (updated)
Pollsters who measured voter opinion in Alberta’s election have now adopted the same approach: we don’t have to tell you the truth anymore – we just have to be plausible! That’s truthiness in action.
UPDATED: Someone famous agrees with me!
The moon, while up at the lake on Saturday night
Standard day at the lake
Jammed my finger under the cabin fixing a pipe, feels like it’s broken. Dog was lost for hours, Son Two inconsolate; she eventually returned. Blackflies are back with a vengeance.
But that moon was so big and close, last night, all of that was forgotten.
Front of today’s Citizen
In today’s Sun (early): Harper’s defeating himself
Almost.
It’s been a year and a few days, now, since Harper’s Party — because, let’s be clear, the Conservative Party would not exist and would not be where it is without Harper — celebrated their big victory on May 2, 2011. The Cons vanquished their much-detested enemy, the Liberals, and reduced them to a rump in the House of Commons.
They received a clear mandate to kill the long-gun registry, and the Canadian Wheat Board, too.
They elected MPs in every province, including Ontario, where voters have long spurned the advances of Conservative candidates. And they did all this despite the hearty dislike that Quebec voters, and many media folks, feel for them.
But a year later, and despite the upside, all is not well with the Harper Party.
Trudeau for…
Well-written. Interesting subject-matter. The author is still a dick.
Robocon: the noose tightens