Daisy Group

“Warren Kinsella's book, ‘Fight the Right: A Manual for Surviving the Coming Conservative Apocalypse,’ is of vital importance for American conservatives and other right-leaning individuals to read, learn and understand.”

- The Washington Times

“One of the best books of the year.”

- The Hill Times

“Justin Trudeau’s speech followed Mr. Kinsella’s playbook on beating conservatives chapter and verse...[He followed] the central theme of the Kinsella narrative: “Take back values. That’s what progressives need to do.”

- National Post

“[Kinsella] is a master when it comes to spinning and political planning...”

- George Stroumboulopoulos, CBC TV

“Kinsella pulls no punches in Fight The Right...Fight the Right accomplishes what it sets out to do – provide readers with a glimpse into the kinds of strategies that have made Conservatives successful and lay out a credible roadmap for progressive forces to regain power.”

- Elizabeth Thompson, iPolitics

“[Kinsella] deserves credit for writing this book, period... he is absolutely on the money...[Fight The Right] is well worth picking up.”

- Huffington Post

“Run, don't walk, to get this amazing book.”

- Mike Duncan, Classical 96 radio

“Fight the Right is very interesting and - for conservatives - very provocative.”

- Former Ontario Conservative leader John Tory

“His new book is great! All of his books are great!”

- Tommy Schnurmacher, CJAD

“I absolutely recommend this book.”

- Paul Wells, Maclean’s

“Kinsella puts the Left on the right track with new book!”

- Calgary Herald

The Conservative Party of Canada: leaderless, powerless and – if they’re not careful – hopeless.

They had their convention in Vancouver over the weekend, the Conservatives did. Former Prime Minister Stephen Harper spoke, resolutions were debated, leadership hopefuls pressed the flesh. Above it all, one question hovered, like an ominous fog: are we doomed? Can we ever beat that Justin Trudeau guy, the man whose honeymoon has no end?

Well, of course you can win again, Conservatives. But only if you do the following ten things.

1. Don’t freak out. You won just about 100 seats despite the Trudeau sweep. You still fundraise better than the governing party. You didn’t lose any of your share of the popular vote -the percentage you got in 2015, in fact, was almost exactly what you got in 2011. Your brand – as evidenced by Saskatchewan and Manitoba, recently – still has value. Resist suggestions, therefore, to radically change everything. Don’t overreact. And, therefore, don’t think salvation lies with loons like Kevin O’Leary. That’s a cure that’s worse than the disease.

2. Oppose, oppose, oppose. You are Her Majesty’s Loyal Opposition: act like it. You were not sent to Ottawa to assist the government, or make creative suggestions about governance. As my boss Jean Chretien used to say to the caucus nervous nellies who always worried about being too negative: “When you’re the opposition, you oppose.” Governments defeat themselves – and your job is to hurry that process along.

3. Action, reaction. Politics is like physics: you shouldn’t ever be replicating what your opponent does – you should be reacting to it. Near the end of his tenure, the aforementioned Harper came to be seen as a sullen, angry guy who didn’t like people so much. So the NDP picked a sullen, angry guy who didn’t like people so much. The Liberals picked a happy, upbeat guy who hugged everyone. Guess who picked right? Exactly. React, don’t replicate.

4. Protect the brand. As with Nike, Apple and Coca-Cola, your party’s brand has value. Your share of 2015 popular vote makes that clear. Despite the fact that your strategists didn’t run a very strategic campaign – despite the fact that your leader seemed to be phoning it in, most of the time – you weren’t wiped out, a la 1993. That should tell you one thing above all: the Tory brand ain’t dead. Reject attempts to mess with it. Nike, Apple and Coke don’t. You shouldn’t either.

5. Fish where there’s fish. Justin Trudeau won for three reasons: the NDP vote went to him, women went to him, and the million-odd Grit voters who abandoned Messrs. Martin, Dion and Ignatieff came home. Those are the three pillars of the Liberal win. Ipso facto, map out a strategy that offsets all that – get a leader who women trust, policies to persuade those million Liberal voters to stay home, and pray like Hell the NDP get a likeable leader next time.

6. Justin Trudeau. That night when the Liberal leader elbowed a woman? When he manhandled his way to multiple shamefaced apologies? Trudeau helpfully revealed his weaknesses to you, that night. Maintain a laser-like focus on same: he isn’t confident, he’s arrogant. He isn’t fresh, he’s rash. He isn’t youthful – he’s too young. Justin Trudeau is the reason why the Liberals won. If you fundamentally change perceptions about him, you win.

7. Lighten up. Canada is the best country in the world. Politics is fun. Oppose, sure, but do it with confidence and coherence. Have fun, occasionally. As James Carville once said to me, the best way to deliver a punch is with a big smile on your face. Do that.

8. Pick a leader. And not just any leader. Personally – and per the “action reaction” advice, above – I’d reckon you need a youngish, multicultural, bilingual woman to offset Trudeau, and cut into his base of support. Is it Lisa Raitt? Michelle Rempel? Someone else? Whoever it is, the Rona Ambrose experiment should tell you one thing: when you address your leadership weaknesses, it plays to your leadership strengths.

9. Ideas. Peering at my crystal ball, I predict Canadians will be quite fed up, thank you very much, with push-ups, boxing matches and baby balancing by 2019. By then, they will want much more steak and much less sizzle. Your next leader – and your team and your policy book – should be bursting with ideas, ideas, ideas. That is how you will defeat the Trudeau phenomenon: with smart ideas, not by making lame selfie jokes.

10. Work harder. None of this is easy – it’s going to require lots of hard work and discipline and strategy. But, as you unpack from your weekend in Vancouver, remember this: in politics as in sports, all that matters is winning. With the right leader – and the right team, organization, ideas and strategy – you can win again.

Will you?

All of you will be tremendously upset, I suspect, to hear that Gord Tulk has – yet again – been asked to take his commenting elsewhere.  What is it with this guy?

Anyway. The commenting rules are here, folks.  Clip and save.


Christ, I love this song. Story of several lives, etc.

It looked like they had a good one – a great one, even.  Even CBC says so.

I have a column about them, and their convention, in today’s Hill Times.  I will have it up on The War Room tomorrow.

In the meantime, allow me to dissent from the joyful chorus about this – the overwhelming vote of CPC delegates to accept equal marriage.

They had to pass a vote about that, you see, because their official policy book actually defined marriage as the union of a man and a woman.  To be precise, the party said marriage was, quote: “union between one man and one woman.”

That’s what it said, as recently as 2016 A.D.  Since 2004 A.D., however, marriage has actually been defined differently.  No less than our highest court said so, right here.  After a bunch of provincial Courts of Appeal radically embraced the proposition that that everyone is equal, the feds made a reference to the Supreme Court.  Among other things, the Supremes said:

The mere recognition of the equality rights of one group cannot, in itself, constitute a violation of the rights of another. The promotion of Charter rights and values enriches our society as a whole and the furtherance of those rights cannot undermine the very principles the Charter was meant to foster.

See? Equal means equal.  No one gets hurt.  Gay people are entitled to have free and frequent access to messy divorce actions and custody squabbles, and unrelenting misery, just like the rest of us.

The Conservative Party of Canada – who were the government for most of the years that followed 2004 – refused to go along with that, however.  They continued to say marriage was the union of one guy and one gal. That’s it.  They stubbornly, wilfully refused to accept the change that had been, er, mandated (pun intended) by several Courts of Appeal and one Supreme Court.

They refused to accept the law of the land.

Anyway, this past weekend, they finally did.  Great. I’m happy about that, I guess, but I would have been a lot happier if they had done so, say, a decade ago.  When it was, you know, constitutionalized.

You will forgive me, therefore, for declining to heap praise on the Conservative Party’s weekend decision to go along with the law and the Constitution.  I don’t think anyone should ever get awards for obeying good laws or respecting the Constitution.

Especially, you know, the people who are supposedly lawmakers.




Wingspan is about four inches. Anyone know what he is, besides the obvious moth part?

Apropos of nothing, this was our wedding song. That’s how we roll, man.

As Kory T. and me predicted, months and months ago. My wife lost the bet and owes us a fancy dinner.

Here’s another prediction: he isn’t going to win the presidency. Not even close. And SFH can tell you why!

recyclable k cups . dating website . What is .locky file?