Harper on Trump
Harper on Trump:
• “I must admit to being shocked by some of the things he said. They’re just not so.”
• “When we talk about subsidizing Canadian defense, I don’t know what he’s talking about.”
• “I have a real problem with some of the things Donald Trump is saying…it doesn’t sound to me like the pronouncements of somebody who’s a friend, a partner and an ally, which is what I’ve always thought the United States is for our country.”
• “Whether or not we have Mr. Trudeau as our prime minister is our choice as Canadians. We don’t tell you who to elect as president of the United States. And so as much as I’m glad to see Mr. Trudeau leaving, this is not Mr. Trump’s decision.”
• “I know Donald Trump would like to believe that he’s pushed Mr. Trudeau out of office, but let me assure you it was a Canadian public opinion and ultimately Mr. Trudeau’s own party that pushed him out of office.”
His dilemma
Not every Canadian Conservative is a Trump fan. But every Canadian Trump fan is a Conservative.
That’s Poilievre’s dilemma, and it’s why he’s been quiet: how does he rebut Trump – as Stephen Harper did so well – without losing the MAGA North jerks who make up 25% of his base?
Hmmm.
I’m just a simple County lawyer, but I’m kind of wondering why the Heritage Department would be funding a self-governing First Nation with an annual budget of $30 million – when the government already has two ministries that are supposed to be dealing with First Nations instead: Indigenous Services Canada and Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada. Must be a coincidence.
In completely unrelated news, I will sleep really well tonight.
“Former federal heritage minister Pablo Rodriguez, who is running for the leadership of the Quebec Liberal Party, is facing questions about his decision to hold a meeting with an Ottawa lobbyist and friend about one of her clients that received funding from his department.
NDP ethics critic Matthew Green said Mr. Rodriguez should not have attended the meeting with Lisa Kirbie, founder and chief executive of the consultancy Blackbird Strategies, when he was heritage minister because it created the appearance of a conflict of interest.
The meeting in November, 2022, on behalf of Ms. Kirbie’s client, Kluane First Nation, was declared in the lobbying register by Ms. Kirbie…But Mr. Green said Mr. Rodriguez should have erred on the side of caution and recused himself from the meeting with Ms. Kirbie. Ministers should step aside from official meetings with friends, he said, as they could pose a potential conflict of interest under ethics rules.
“Meeting with a lobbyist who is a close friend and an active advocate for a client receiving government funds creates the appearance of a conflict of interest, whether the funding was in the pipeline or not. This is really problematic all around,” Mr. Green said.
“We have lots of questions to ask. There is no way he [Mr. Rodriguez] should have attended the meeting. You should not meet close friends who have a financial interest in your relationship whether you perceive it or not.”
“Minister Rodriguez’s resignation in order to run for the Quebec Liberal leadership while narrowly avoiding opposition accountability because of the prorogation, still leaves the stench of insider dealings for well-connected friends of the Liberal Party,” he added.
Conservative ethics critic Michael Barrett, responding to questions about Mr. Rodriguez, accused Liberals of “helping their Liberal insiders and friends while Canadians suffer.”
…The subject matters discussed at the Nov. 21 meeting, according to the lobbying register, were aboriginal affairs and arts and culture. Ms. Kirbie also registered a meeting the same day with two senior heritage department officials: Mala Khanna, associate deputy minister at Canadian Heritage, and Paul Pelletier, director general for Indigenous languages.”
KINSELLACAST 344: So long Justin, so long Canada? Lilley, Kheiriddin, Belanger, Mraz, Mulroney, Koch, Hollett, Wells plus HotWax, the Bug Club, Satin Cali, Oscar G and more
My latest: always fighting the last war
This is the only thing you should read today
by Jean Chretien
Today is my 91st birthday.
It’s an opportunity to celebrate with family and friends. To look back on the life I’ve had the privilege to lead. And to reflect on how much this country we all love so much has grown and changed over the course of the nine decades I’ve been on this Earth.
This year, I’ve also decided to give myself a birthday present. I’m going to do something in this article that I don’t do very often anymore, and sound off on a big issue affecting the state of the nation and profoundly bothering me and so many other Canadians: The totally unacceptable insults and unprecedented threats to our very sovereignty from U.S. president-elect Donald Trump.
I have two very clear and simple messages.
To Donald Trump, from one old guy to another: Give your head a shake! What could make you think that Canadians would ever give up the best country in the world – and make no mistake, that is what we are – to join the United States?
I can tell you Canadians prize our independence. We love our country. We have built something here that is the envy of the world – when it comes to compassion, understanding, tolerance and finding a way for people of different backgrounds and faiths to live together in harmony.
We’ve also built a strong social safety net – especially with public health care – that we are very proud of. It’s not perfect, but it’s based on the principle that the most vulnerable among us should be protected.
This may not be the “American Way” or “the Trump Way.” But it is the reality I have witnessed and lived my whole long life.
If you think that threatening and insulting us is going to win us over, you really don’t know a thing about us. You don’t know that when it came to fighting in two world wars for freedom, we signed up – both times – years before your country did. We fought and we sacrificed well beyond our numbers.
We also had the guts to say no to your country when it tried to drag us into a completely unjustified and destabilizing war in Iraq.
We built a nation across the most rugged, challenging geography imaginable. And we did it against the odds.
We may look easy-going. Mild-mannered. But make no mistake, we have spine and toughness.
And that leads me to my second message, to all our leaders, federal and provincial, as well as those who are aspiring to lead our country: Start showing that spine and toughness. That’s what Canadians want to see – what they need to see. It’s called leadership. You need to lead. Canadians are ready to follow.
I know the spirit is there. Ever since Mr. Trump’s attacks, every political party is speaking out in favour of Canada. In fact, it is to my great satisfaction that even the Bloc Québécois is defending Canada.
But you don’t win a hockey game by only playing defence. We all know that even when we satisfy one demand, Mr. Trump will come back with another, bigger demand. That’s not diplomacy; it’s blackmail.
We need another approach – one that will break this cycle.
Mr. Trump has accomplished one thing: He has unified Canadians more than we have been ever before! All leaders across our country have united in resolve to defend Canadian interests.
When I came into office as prime minister, Canada faced a national unity crisis. The threat of Quebec separation was very real. We took action to deal with this existential threat in a manner that made Canadians, including Quebeckers, stronger, more united and even prouder of Canadian values.
Now there is another existential threat. And we once again need to reduce our vulnerability. That is the challenge for this generation of political leaders.
And you won’t accomplish it by using the same old approaches. Just like we did 30 years ago, we need a Plan B for 2025.
Yes, telling the Americans we are their best friends and closest trading partner is good. So is lobbying hard in Washington and the state capitals, pointing out that tariffs will hurt the American economy too. So are retaliatory tariffs – when you are attacked, you have to defend yourself.
But we also have to play offence. Let’s tell Mr. Trump that we too have border issues with the United States. Canada has tough gun control legislation, but illegal guns are pouring in from the U.S. We need to tell him that we expect the United States to act to reduce the number of guns crossing into Canada.
We also want to protect the Arctic. But the United States refuses to recognize the Northwest Passage, insisting that it is an international waterway, even though it flows through the Canadian Arctic as Canadian waters. We need the United States to recognize the Northwest Passage as being Canadian waters.
We also need to reduce Canada’s vulnerability in the first place. We need to be stronger. There are more trade barriers between provinces than between Canada and the United States. Let’s launch a national project to get rid of those barriers! And let’s strengthen the ties that bind this vast nation together through projects such as real national energy grid.
We also have to understand that Mr. Trump isn’t just threatening us; he’s also targeting a growing list of other countries, as well as the European Union itself, and he is just getting started. Canada should quickly convene a meeting of the leaders of Denmark, Panama, Mexico, as well as with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, to formulate a plan for fighting back these threats.
Every time that Mr. Trump opens his mouth, he creates new allies for all of us. So let’s get organized! To fight back against a big, powerful bully, you need strength in numbers.
The whole point is not to wait in dread for Donald Trump’s next blow. It’s to build a country and an international community that can withstand those blows.
Canadians know me. They know I am an optimist. That I am practical. And that I always speak my mind. I made my share of mistakes over a long career, but I never for a moment doubted the decency of my fellow Canadians – or of my political opponents.
The current and future generations of political leaders should remember they are not each other’s enemies – they are opponents. Nobody ever loved the cut-and-thrust of politics more than me, but I always understood that each of us was trying to make a positive contribution to make our community or country a better place.
That spirit is more important now than ever, as we address this new challenge. Our leaders should keep that in mind.
I am 91 today and blessed with good health. I am ready at the ramparts to help defend the independence of our country as I have done all my life.
Vive le Canada!
Dear Christy letter
Dear Christy Clark:
Here is what you should’ve said.
• Yeah. I got a Tory membership to stop Poilievre. I think he’d be a disaster for Canada. Still do.
• The Tories may or may not have a copy of it. I don’t care either way. They never sent me one, which testifies to their incompetence.
• Someone is playing games. I don’t know who, and I don’t care about that either. But I can tell they’re scared. They should be. I love being underestimated.
Anyway. Woulda coulda shoulda. Too late now.
I haven’t talked to her in a decade. Thought she would’ve been ready for an obvious question like that.
But man oh man, that was a big self-own. May be fatal.
Sincerely,
Etc.
Bonne fete!
Happy birthday to the best Prime Minister Canada has ever had!