The only #LavScam questions that matter
Tonight and since this story broke, these are the only questions that really matter:
1. What role did Gerald Butts play in Jody Wilson-Raybould’s demotion?
2. Why she was demoted?
Everything else is noise.
Tonight and since this story broke, these are the only questions that really matter:
1. What role did Gerald Butts play in Jody Wilson-Raybould’s demotion?
2. Why she was demoted?
Everything else is noise.
Lengthy statement below, at the end of which one can only ask:
“Then why resign?”
Climate change, and our inability to deal with it, has become a corollary to the essential impotence of states and individuals. What Mandela said about how an individual has the power to change all the world? Climate change suggests it isn’t true, if it ever was.
— Warren Kinsella (@kinsellawarren) February 18, 2019
#LavScam has captured most of the media attention, so not as many people noticed when the presiding judge in the Norman case stated in open court that there appeared to be collusion between PMO/PCO and the prosecution. See here.
If that’s true, Donato’s cartoon is pretty accurate.
And, if that’s true, we’re talking about multiple criminal acts – involving the same people.
One of our daughters spotted this on Facebook. She sent it along – and I at first didn’t believe it was real.
Apparently it is. The link it goes to is here.
Personally, this ad struck me as sexist and stupid. I mean, does the CAF run ads asking young men similar kinds of stuff?
What do you think? Dumb move or clever marketing?
We do these Highly-Scientific™ Polls for fun, generally. But you want to know something that is sad – that is maddening and pathetic and repellant, too?
All of the quotes found in the poll below are real. They are actual statements made by Justin Trudeau or his fart-ctachers. They said those things.
As I always remind you, gentle reader, that hoary old Watergate-era maxim is as true now as it was then: it’s never the break-in, it’s always the cover-up. And the cover-up of #LavScam is in full effect. You only have to have watched that abortion of justice, at this week’s “Justice” Committee, to see it on display, in real time.
But it isn’t working. The Trudeau Party – because they’re not the Liberal Party, to many of us – have dropped five percentage points in a week. Another Liberal MP retired yesterday, and another one the day before that. I am hearing from Grits, all over, and they are disgusted by the racist, sexist, almost-certainly-illegal way in which Trudeau’s party dealt with Jody. And they plan to donate no time or money to the 2019 election effort – or even vote for another party.
Anyway. Here’s the poll. It’s funny and sad. Funny, because Trudeau has overseen the worst crisis communications effort since Watergate.
Sad, because all of these things were actually said.
#LavScam effect, in effect. Here.
The Conservatives appear to be chipping away at the Liberals’ chances of securing another majority in October, with Andrew Scheer’s party leading with 37 per cent in overall support among those surveyed, compared to the Grits at 32 per cent, a Campaign Research poll suggests. New Democrats, meanwhile, are still trailing considerably behind the other two parties at 14 per cent.
And check out this, from the Star,
Trudeau admits Wilson-Raybould challenged him on SNC-Lavalin
OTTAWA—Prime Minister Justin Trudeau admits his former justice minister and attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould challenged her boss last fall to clarify if he was “directing” her to make a decision in the disputed bribery prosecution of SNC-Lavalin.
Trudeau refused Friday to say exactly what he told his former attorney general or whether he indicated his own preference to her.
“…Jody Wilson-Raybould asked me if I was directing her or going to direct her to take a particular decision and I of course said no, that it was her decision to make and I expected her to make it,” Trudeau told reporters Friday.
When asked if he had expressed a preference, and if it is possible Wilson-Raybould felt his comments as pressure, Trudeau declined a direct answer.